评估低排放试点政策在促进污染减排和碳减排方面的效用:利用多时双差分析进行实证调查。

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123196
Zhen Chen, Ying Shi, Rijia Ding
{"title":"评估低排放试点政策在促进污染减排和碳减排方面的效用:利用多时双差分析进行实证调查。","authors":"Zhen Chen, Ying Shi, Rijia Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collaborative governance for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation can effectively resist the pressure brought about by ecological and environmental changes while reducing policy costs. To explore the \"win-win\" path of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation,\" based on panel data from 286 cities in China from 2000 to 2021, this study regards the low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCP) as a quasi-natural experiment and explores its impact on urban carbon emissions and pm<sub>2.5</sub> concentration. Multiple testing methods, including multi-temporal double difference, spatial autocorrelation, local cold and hot spot analysis, kernel density analysis, standard deviation ellipse, spatial Durbin model, and PSM-DID, were used to verify the credibility and scientificity of the research results. The results showed that (1) LCCP had a direct effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions, reducing co<sub>2</sub> emissions by 3% and pm<sub>2.5</sub> by 2.9%, with a synergistic effect of 20.2%; (2) the synergistic effect of LCCP on pollution and carbon reduction was indirectly achieved through green finance, green technological innovation, and green transportation, with impacts of 3.6%, 5.5%, and 2.4% in eastern, central, and non-resource based cities, respectively; and (3) the spillover effect coefficient of LCCP on carbon emission reduction in surrounding cities was -0.040 and that on pm<sub>2.5</sub> concentration was -1.232, which are significant at the 10% and 1% levels, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the utility of low-emission pilot policies for facilitating pollution reduction and carbon mitigation: An empirical investigation using multi-temporal double difference analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Chen, Ying Shi, Rijia Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Collaborative governance for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation can effectively resist the pressure brought about by ecological and environmental changes while reducing policy costs. To explore the \\\"win-win\\\" path of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation,\\\" based on panel data from 286 cities in China from 2000 to 2021, this study regards the low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCP) as a quasi-natural experiment and explores its impact on urban carbon emissions and pm<sub>2.5</sub> concentration. Multiple testing methods, including multi-temporal double difference, spatial autocorrelation, local cold and hot spot analysis, kernel density analysis, standard deviation ellipse, spatial Durbin model, and PSM-DID, were used to verify the credibility and scientificity of the research results. The results showed that (1) LCCP had a direct effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions, reducing co<sub>2</sub> emissions by 3% and pm<sub>2.5</sub> by 2.9%, with a synergistic effect of 20.2%; (2) the synergistic effect of LCCP on pollution and carbon reduction was indirectly achieved through green finance, green technological innovation, and green transportation, with impacts of 3.6%, 5.5%, and 2.4% in eastern, central, and non-resource based cities, respectively; and (3) the spillover effect coefficient of LCCP on carbon emission reduction in surrounding cities was -0.040 and that on pm<sub>2.5</sub> concentration was -1.232, which are significant at the 10% and 1% levels, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

污染减排与碳减排的协同治理既能有效抵御生态环境变化带来的压力,又能降低政策成本。为探索污染减排与碳减排的 "双赢 "路径,本研究基于 2000 年至 2021 年中国 286 个城市的面板数据,将低碳城市试点政策(LCCP)视为准自然实验,探讨其对城市碳排放和 pm2.5 浓度的影响。采用多时双差、空间自相关、局地冷热点分析、核密度分析、标准偏差椭圆、空间杜宾模型、PSM-DID等多种检验方法,验证研究结果的可信度和科学性。结果表明:(1)LCCP 对减少污染和碳排放有直接影响,减少了 3% 的 co2 排放和 2.9% 的 pm2.5,协同效应为 20.2%;(2)LCCP 对减少污染和碳排放的协同效应是通过绿色金融、绿色技术创新和绿色交通间接实现的,影响分别为 3.6%、5.5%和2.4%;(3)LCCP对周边城市碳减排的溢出效应系数为-0.040,对pm2.5浓度的溢出效应系数为-1.232,分别在10%和1%水平上显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the utility of low-emission pilot policies for facilitating pollution reduction and carbon mitigation: An empirical investigation using multi-temporal double difference analysis.

Collaborative governance for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation can effectively resist the pressure brought about by ecological and environmental changes while reducing policy costs. To explore the "win-win" path of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation," based on panel data from 286 cities in China from 2000 to 2021, this study regards the low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCP) as a quasi-natural experiment and explores its impact on urban carbon emissions and pm2.5 concentration. Multiple testing methods, including multi-temporal double difference, spatial autocorrelation, local cold and hot spot analysis, kernel density analysis, standard deviation ellipse, spatial Durbin model, and PSM-DID, were used to verify the credibility and scientificity of the research results. The results showed that (1) LCCP had a direct effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions, reducing co2 emissions by 3% and pm2.5 by 2.9%, with a synergistic effect of 20.2%; (2) the synergistic effect of LCCP on pollution and carbon reduction was indirectly achieved through green finance, green technological innovation, and green transportation, with impacts of 3.6%, 5.5%, and 2.4% in eastern, central, and non-resource based cities, respectively; and (3) the spillover effect coefficient of LCCP on carbon emission reduction in surrounding cities was -0.040 and that on pm2.5 concentration was -1.232, which are significant at the 10% and 1% levels, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Advanced nitrate removal in sulfur autotrophic denitrification biofilter under dissolved oxygen shock and low temperature enhanced by boron oxide and magnesium oxide: Hydrogen sulfide accumulation and regulation. Analyzing the role of environmental policy innovations and natural resource management in driving circular economy forward: Evidence from BRICS economies. Does corporate ESG performance promote export resilience? New insights from risk resistance and resilience. Assessing the utility of low-emission pilot policies for facilitating pollution reduction and carbon mitigation: An empirical investigation using multi-temporal double difference analysis. Can urban digital intelligence transformation promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1