让我们齐心协力,通过医学院的考试":关于医学生对团队合作、竞争与协作态度的定性研究。

IF 2.8 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY FEBS Open Bio Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1002/2211-5463.13915
Helen R Watson, Paul Millin, James Close, Robert Jeffery, Holly Stephenson, Daniel Zahra
{"title":"让我们齐心协力,通过医学院的考试\":关于医学生对团队合作、竞争与协作态度的定性研究。","authors":"Helen R Watson, Paul Millin, James Close, Robert Jeffery, Holly Stephenson, Daniel Zahra","doi":"10.1002/2211-5463.13915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teamwork is vital to all types of work, and graduates of higher education programmes must be prepared to contribute to a wide variety of professional teams. This is especially true in healthcare, where graduates will work in multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) under considerable pressure. This study is a follow-up to a previous study, where we described how competition between students is a barrier to constructive teamwork. Since then, we have made considerable enhancements to our transferable skills curriculum, moved away from norm referencing, and there have been national changes to the way that graduate Foundation training places are allocated. Here we present findings from a qualitative study of students from all six stages of our medical degree programme (5 years plus predegree foundation year). We explored whether there had been changes in how students perceived the importance of teamwork, their own teamwork development and how they collaborated with their peers. Following analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews, five themes emerged: (a) competition between students; (b) importance of teamwork; (c) what makes effective teamwork; (d) preparing for work in MDTs; and (e) recommendations for teamwork education. Competition between students was perceived as both positive and negative, but there has been a shift since our last study towards collaboration, with students now more willing to help each other succeed. Students also show more insight into their teamwork development, and were able to discuss what aspects of the programme, and higher education more broadly, were most valuable in helping them develop.</p>","PeriodicalId":12187,"journal":{"name":"FEBS Open Bio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Let's work together to pass medical school': a qualitative study of medical student attitudes to teamwork, competition and collaboration.\",\"authors\":\"Helen R Watson, Paul Millin, James Close, Robert Jeffery, Holly Stephenson, Daniel Zahra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2211-5463.13915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Teamwork is vital to all types of work, and graduates of higher education programmes must be prepared to contribute to a wide variety of professional teams. This is especially true in healthcare, where graduates will work in multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) under considerable pressure. This study is a follow-up to a previous study, where we described how competition between students is a barrier to constructive teamwork. Since then, we have made considerable enhancements to our transferable skills curriculum, moved away from norm referencing, and there have been national changes to the way that graduate Foundation training places are allocated. Here we present findings from a qualitative study of students from all six stages of our medical degree programme (5 years plus predegree foundation year). We explored whether there had been changes in how students perceived the importance of teamwork, their own teamwork development and how they collaborated with their peers. Following analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews, five themes emerged: (a) competition between students; (b) importance of teamwork; (c) what makes effective teamwork; (d) preparing for work in MDTs; and (e) recommendations for teamwork education. Competition between students was perceived as both positive and negative, but there has been a shift since our last study towards collaboration, with students now more willing to help each other succeed. Students also show more insight into their teamwork development, and were able to discuss what aspects of the programme, and higher education more broadly, were most valuable in helping them develop.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEBS Open Bio\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEBS Open Bio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEBS Open Bio","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

团队合作对所有类型的工作都至关重要,高等教育课程的毕业生必须做好为各种专业团队做出贡献的准备。这一点在医疗保健领域尤为突出,因为毕业生将在压力巨大的多学科团队(MDT)中工作。本研究是上一项研究的后续研究,在上一项研究中,我们描述了学生之间的竞争是如何阻碍建设性团队合作的。从那时起,我们对可迁移技能课程进行了大量改进,摒弃了标准参考,并对研究生预科培训名额的分配方式进行了全国性改革。在此,我们将介绍对医学学位课程所有六个阶段(五年制加学位预科)的学生进行定性研究的结果。我们探讨了学生对团队合作重要性的认识、他们自身的团队合作发展以及他们与同学的合作方式是否发生了变化。在对深入的半结构式访谈进行分析后,得出了五个主题:(a) 学生之间的竞争;(b) 团队合作的重要性;(c) 什么是有效的团队合作;(d) 为在 MDT 工作做准备;以及 (e) 对团队合作教育的建议。学生之间的竞争既被认为是积极的,也被认为是消极的,但自上次研究以来,学生之间的竞争已转向合作,学生们现在更愿意帮助彼此取得成功。学生们还对自己的团队合作发展表现出了更多的洞察力,并能够讨论该课程以及更广泛的高等教育中哪些方面对他们的发展最有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Let's work together to pass medical school': a qualitative study of medical student attitudes to teamwork, competition and collaboration.

Teamwork is vital to all types of work, and graduates of higher education programmes must be prepared to contribute to a wide variety of professional teams. This is especially true in healthcare, where graduates will work in multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) under considerable pressure. This study is a follow-up to a previous study, where we described how competition between students is a barrier to constructive teamwork. Since then, we have made considerable enhancements to our transferable skills curriculum, moved away from norm referencing, and there have been national changes to the way that graduate Foundation training places are allocated. Here we present findings from a qualitative study of students from all six stages of our medical degree programme (5 years plus predegree foundation year). We explored whether there had been changes in how students perceived the importance of teamwork, their own teamwork development and how they collaborated with their peers. Following analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews, five themes emerged: (a) competition between students; (b) importance of teamwork; (c) what makes effective teamwork; (d) preparing for work in MDTs; and (e) recommendations for teamwork education. Competition between students was perceived as both positive and negative, but there has been a shift since our last study towards collaboration, with students now more willing to help each other succeed. Students also show more insight into their teamwork development, and were able to discuss what aspects of the programme, and higher education more broadly, were most valuable in helping them develop.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FEBS Open Bio
FEBS Open Bio BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
173
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: FEBS Open Bio is an online-only open access journal for the rapid publication of research articles in molecular and cellular life sciences in both health and disease. The journal''s peer review process focuses on the technical soundness of papers, leaving the assessment of their impact and importance to the scientific community. FEBS Open Bio is owned by the Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS), a not-for-profit organization, and is published on behalf of FEBS by FEBS Press and Wiley. Any income from the journal will be used to support scientists through fellowships, courses, travel grants, prizes and other FEBS initiatives.
期刊最新文献
Real-world genomic landscape of colon and rectal cancer. An open chat between Prof Asifa Akhtar and Klaudia Jaczynska. Young, female and scientist: exploring barriers, challenges and opportunities. Comparative activity of dimethyl fumarate derivative IDMF in three models relevant to multiple sclerosis and psoriasis. FAM136A depletion induces mitochondrial stress and reduces mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1