胎粪染色羊水厚度对孕产妇感染性发病率的影响:临床和微生物学综合分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07808-4
Raneen Abu Shqara, Lior Lowenstein, Maya Frank Wolf
{"title":"胎粪染色羊水厚度对孕产妇感染性发病率的影响:临床和微生物学综合分析。","authors":"Raneen Abu Shqara, Lior Lowenstein, Maya Frank Wolf","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07808-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the thickness of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) and maternal infectious morbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 15,950 term singleton pregnancies at a tertiary hospital (2020-2024). Women were categorized into four groups based on the presence and thickness of MSAF: clear, light, intermediate, and thick. The co-primary outcomes were clinical chorioamnionitis and puerperal endometritis, defined as a composite maternal infectious morbidity. In women with intrapartum fever (IPF), chorioamniotic swabs were obtained and compared according MSAF thickness. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of a composite maternal infections and adverse neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the cohort, 13,745 had clear amniotic fluid, and 2,205 had MSAF (561 light, 1,426 intermediate, 218 thick). The incidence of maternal infections increased with MSAF thickness, with thick MSAF showing the highest rates of clinical chorioamnionitis (4.1%, p < 0.001) and endometritis (1.4%, p = 0.039). In IPF cases, thicker MSAF was associated with a higher prevalence of positive swab cultures, particularly of Enterobacteriaceae (61.9%). Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remained consistent across all MSAF groups. Multivariate analysis showed that MSAF levels were associated with increased maternal infectious morbidity (p < 0.001). Additional risk factors for maternal infections included nulliparity (p < 0.001), catheter balloon insertion (p = 0.004), prolonged ROM (p < 0.001), and cesarean delivery (p < 0.001). In contrast, only intermediate (p < 0.001) and thick MSAF (p < 0.001) correlated with adverse neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater severity of MSAF is associated with increased maternal infectious morbidity, especially infections related to Enterobacteriaceae. Studies about preventive measures in cases of thick MSAF are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of meconium-stained amniotic fluid thickness on maternal infectious morbidity: a comprehensive clinical and microbiological analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Raneen Abu Shqara, Lior Lowenstein, Maya Frank Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07808-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the thickness of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) and maternal infectious morbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 15,950 term singleton pregnancies at a tertiary hospital (2020-2024). Women were categorized into four groups based on the presence and thickness of MSAF: clear, light, intermediate, and thick. The co-primary outcomes were clinical chorioamnionitis and puerperal endometritis, defined as a composite maternal infectious morbidity. In women with intrapartum fever (IPF), chorioamniotic swabs were obtained and compared according MSAF thickness. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of a composite maternal infections and adverse neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the cohort, 13,745 had clear amniotic fluid, and 2,205 had MSAF (561 light, 1,426 intermediate, 218 thick). The incidence of maternal infections increased with MSAF thickness, with thick MSAF showing the highest rates of clinical chorioamnionitis (4.1%, p < 0.001) and endometritis (1.4%, p = 0.039). In IPF cases, thicker MSAF was associated with a higher prevalence of positive swab cultures, particularly of Enterobacteriaceae (61.9%). Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remained consistent across all MSAF groups. Multivariate analysis showed that MSAF levels were associated with increased maternal infectious morbidity (p < 0.001). Additional risk factors for maternal infections included nulliparity (p < 0.001), catheter balloon insertion (p = 0.004), prolonged ROM (p < 0.001), and cesarean delivery (p < 0.001). In contrast, only intermediate (p < 0.001) and thick MSAF (p < 0.001) correlated with adverse neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater severity of MSAF is associated with increased maternal infectious morbidity, especially infections related to Enterobacteriaceae. Studies about preventive measures in cases of thick MSAF are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07808-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07808-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨胎粪染色羊水(MSAF)厚度与孕产妇感染性发病率之间的相关性:方法:对一家三甲医院的 15950 例足月单胎妊娠(2020-2024 年)进行回顾性研究。根据 MSAF 的存在和厚度将孕妇分为四组:透明组、轻度组、中度组和重度组。共同主要结果是临床绒毛膜羊膜炎和产褥期子宫内膜炎,定义为孕产妇感染性疾病的综合发病率。在产褥热(IPF)产妇中,采集绒毛膜羊膜拭子并根据 MSAF 厚度进行比较。多变量分析确定了产妇综合感染和新生儿不良结局的预测因素:13,745 名产妇的羊水是透明的,2,205 名产妇的羊水为 MSAF(轻度 561 例、中度 1,426 例、重度 218 例)。产妇感染的发生率随 MSAF 厚度的增加而增加,厚 MSAF 显示临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的发生率最高(4.1%,p 结论:MSAF 的严重程度越高,产妇感染的发生率就越高:MSAF 的严重程度与孕产妇感染发病率的增加有关,尤其是与肠杆菌科细菌有关的感染。有必要对厚重的 MSAF 病例进行预防措施研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of meconium-stained amniotic fluid thickness on maternal infectious morbidity: a comprehensive clinical and microbiological analysis.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the thickness of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) and maternal infectious morbidity.

Methods: A retrospective study of 15,950 term singleton pregnancies at a tertiary hospital (2020-2024). Women were categorized into four groups based on the presence and thickness of MSAF: clear, light, intermediate, and thick. The co-primary outcomes were clinical chorioamnionitis and puerperal endometritis, defined as a composite maternal infectious morbidity. In women with intrapartum fever (IPF), chorioamniotic swabs were obtained and compared according MSAF thickness. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of a composite maternal infections and adverse neonatal outcomes.

Results: Of the cohort, 13,745 had clear amniotic fluid, and 2,205 had MSAF (561 light, 1,426 intermediate, 218 thick). The incidence of maternal infections increased with MSAF thickness, with thick MSAF showing the highest rates of clinical chorioamnionitis (4.1%, p < 0.001) and endometritis (1.4%, p = 0.039). In IPF cases, thicker MSAF was associated with a higher prevalence of positive swab cultures, particularly of Enterobacteriaceae (61.9%). Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remained consistent across all MSAF groups. Multivariate analysis showed that MSAF levels were associated with increased maternal infectious morbidity (p < 0.001). Additional risk factors for maternal infections included nulliparity (p < 0.001), catheter balloon insertion (p = 0.004), prolonged ROM (p < 0.001), and cesarean delivery (p < 0.001). In contrast, only intermediate (p < 0.001) and thick MSAF (p < 0.001) correlated with adverse neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: Greater severity of MSAF is associated with increased maternal infectious morbidity, especially infections related to Enterobacteriaceae. Studies about preventive measures in cases of thick MSAF are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory study on the enhancement of O-RADS application effectiveness for novice ultrasonographers via deep learning. Supportive care and information needs in relation to quality of life among patients with breast cancer and gynaecological cancer during the time of treatment. Evaluation of uterocervical angle in intrauterine device displacement cases. Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean sections: insights from a 15 year experience at a tertiary care center and a systematic review with meta-analysis. When pulmonary arterial hypertension and pregnancy meet: a multidisciplinary clinical experts review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1