在加纳南部进行的一项横断面研究中,Typhidot RDT 在伤寒诊断中的诊断性能和抗生素耐药性特征。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES BMC Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s12879-024-10160-2
Emmanuel Kweku Sam, Johnson Alagbo, Avis Asamoah, Felix Ansah, Kwesi Zandoh Tandoh, Lucas N Amenga-Etego, Samuel Duodu
{"title":"在加纳南部进行的一项横断面研究中,Typhidot RDT 在伤寒诊断中的诊断性能和抗生素耐药性特征。","authors":"Emmanuel Kweku Sam, Johnson Alagbo, Avis Asamoah, Felix Ansah, Kwesi Zandoh Tandoh, Lucas N Amenga-Etego, Samuel Duodu","doi":"10.1186/s12879-024-10160-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Typhoid fever remains a significant public health problem contributing to significant misapplication of antibiotics in Ghana. However, there is little data on the accuracy of the commonly used serology based rapid diagnostic Typhidot test kit (Typhidot RDT) for confirming typhoid fever.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Typhidot RDT in seven clinical facilities across five regions in Southern Ghana. A total of 258 participants, clinically diagnosed with typhoid fever, were enrolled in this study. Blood and stool samples were obtained for culture, Typhidot and PCR assays. Disc diffusion antibiotic sensitivity was performed to determine the resistance pattern of Salmonella enterica isolates from positive blood and stool cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery of S. enterica isolates was higher from stool samples (14.7%) in comparison to blood samples (1.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of Typhidot compared to blood and stool cultures was 35% (19.94%-52.65%) and 45% (38.67%-51.45%), respectively. Compared to PCR, the Typhidot had a sensitivity and a specificity of 61% and 53%, respectively. Resistance phenotyping of isolates showed broad sensitivity to the front-line antibiotics used. Resistance to ampicillin (10%), cotrimoxazole (7%), azithromycin and ciprofloxacin (< 5%) was found in some isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest sub-optimal performance of the Typhidot RDT for diagnosis of typhoid in Ghana with a higher chance for misdiagnosis and misapplication of antibiotics. The high proportion of isolates recovered from stool culture is consistent with the pathophysiology of bacterial shedding during the acute phase of infection, which provides a window of opportunity to control typhoid transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"24 1","pages":"1262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of Typhidot RDT in diagnosis of typhoid fever and antibiotic resistance characterisation in a cross-sectional study in Southern Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Kweku Sam, Johnson Alagbo, Avis Asamoah, Felix Ansah, Kwesi Zandoh Tandoh, Lucas N Amenga-Etego, Samuel Duodu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-024-10160-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Typhoid fever remains a significant public health problem contributing to significant misapplication of antibiotics in Ghana. However, there is little data on the accuracy of the commonly used serology based rapid diagnostic Typhidot test kit (Typhidot RDT) for confirming typhoid fever.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Typhidot RDT in seven clinical facilities across five regions in Southern Ghana. A total of 258 participants, clinically diagnosed with typhoid fever, were enrolled in this study. Blood and stool samples were obtained for culture, Typhidot and PCR assays. Disc diffusion antibiotic sensitivity was performed to determine the resistance pattern of Salmonella enterica isolates from positive blood and stool cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery of S. enterica isolates was higher from stool samples (14.7%) in comparison to blood samples (1.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of Typhidot compared to blood and stool cultures was 35% (19.94%-52.65%) and 45% (38.67%-51.45%), respectively. Compared to PCR, the Typhidot had a sensitivity and a specificity of 61% and 53%, respectively. Resistance phenotyping of isolates showed broad sensitivity to the front-line antibiotics used. Resistance to ampicillin (10%), cotrimoxazole (7%), azithromycin and ciprofloxacin (< 5%) was found in some isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest sub-optimal performance of the Typhidot RDT for diagnosis of typhoid in Ghana with a higher chance for misdiagnosis and misapplication of antibiotics. The high proportion of isolates recovered from stool culture is consistent with the pathophysiology of bacterial shedding during the acute phase of infection, which provides a window of opportunity to control typhoid transmission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10160-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10160-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在加纳,伤寒仍是一个严重的公共卫生问题,导致大量抗生素被滥用。然而,关于常用的基于血清学的伤寒快速诊断试剂盒(Typhidot RDT)确诊伤寒的准确性数据却很少:我们在加纳南部五个地区的七个临床机构开展了一项研究,以评估typhidot RDT的诊断准确性。共有 258 名临床诊断为伤寒的患者参与了这项研究。研究人员采集了血液和粪便样本进行培养、Typhidot和PCR检测。为确定从阳性血液和粪便培养物中分离出的肠炎沙门氏菌的耐药性模式,进行了抗生素敏感性盘扩散试验:结果:与血液样本(1.6%)相比,粪便样本(14.7%)的肠炎沙门氏菌分离率更高。与血液和粪便培养物相比,typhidot 的敏感性和特异性分别为 35% (19.94%-52.65%) 和 45% (38.67%-51.45%)。与 PCR 相比,Typhidot 的敏感性和特异性分别为 61% 和 53%。分离菌株的耐药性表型分析表明,它们对所用的一线抗生素具有广泛的敏感性。对氨苄西林(10%)、复方新诺明(7%)、阿奇霉素和环丙沙星(结论:氨苄西林、复方新诺明、阿奇霉素和环丙沙星均有耐药性:这些发现表明,在加纳,Typhidot RDT 诊断伤寒的效果并不理想,误诊和误用抗生素的几率较高。从粪便培养中分离出的高比例分离物与感染急性期细菌脱落的病理生理学相一致,这为控制伤寒传播提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic performance of Typhidot RDT in diagnosis of typhoid fever and antibiotic resistance characterisation in a cross-sectional study in Southern Ghana.

Background: Typhoid fever remains a significant public health problem contributing to significant misapplication of antibiotics in Ghana. However, there is little data on the accuracy of the commonly used serology based rapid diagnostic Typhidot test kit (Typhidot RDT) for confirming typhoid fever.

Methods: We conducted a study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Typhidot RDT in seven clinical facilities across five regions in Southern Ghana. A total of 258 participants, clinically diagnosed with typhoid fever, were enrolled in this study. Blood and stool samples were obtained for culture, Typhidot and PCR assays. Disc diffusion antibiotic sensitivity was performed to determine the resistance pattern of Salmonella enterica isolates from positive blood and stool cultures.

Results: Recovery of S. enterica isolates was higher from stool samples (14.7%) in comparison to blood samples (1.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of Typhidot compared to blood and stool cultures was 35% (19.94%-52.65%) and 45% (38.67%-51.45%), respectively. Compared to PCR, the Typhidot had a sensitivity and a specificity of 61% and 53%, respectively. Resistance phenotyping of isolates showed broad sensitivity to the front-line antibiotics used. Resistance to ampicillin (10%), cotrimoxazole (7%), azithromycin and ciprofloxacin (< 5%) was found in some isolates.

Conclusions: These findings suggest sub-optimal performance of the Typhidot RDT for diagnosis of typhoid in Ghana with a higher chance for misdiagnosis and misapplication of antibiotics. The high proportion of isolates recovered from stool culture is consistent with the pathophysiology of bacterial shedding during the acute phase of infection, which provides a window of opportunity to control typhoid transmission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological characteristics and spatio-temporal clusters of human brucellosis in Inner Mongolia, 2010-2021. Epidemiological characteristics of five non-COVID respiratory viruses among 37,139 all-age patients during 2018 - 2023 in Weifang, China: a cross-sectional study. HIV phylogenetic clusters point to unmet hiv prevention, testing and treatment needs among men who have sex with men in kenya. Optimizing identification of Lyme disease diagnoses in commercial insurance claims data, United States, 2016-2019. Pre-market health systems barriers and enablers to infectious diseases point-of-care diagnostics in Australia: qualitative interviews with key informants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1