性别差异对化疗药物剂量选择和优化的重要性。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1159/000542461
Claire Seydoux, Myriam Briki, Anna D Wagner, Eva Choong, Monia Guidi, Sandro Carrara, Yann Thoma, Françoise Livio, François R Girardin, Catia Marzolini, Thierry Buclin, Laurent A Decosterd
{"title":"性别差异对化疗药物剂量选择和优化的重要性。","authors":"Claire Seydoux, Myriam Briki, Anna D Wagner, Eva Choong, Monia Guidi, Sandro Carrara, Yann Thoma, Françoise Livio, François R Girardin, Catia Marzolini, Thierry Buclin, Laurent A Decosterd","doi":"10.1159/000542461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Despite major advances in cancer treatment in the past years, there is a need to optimize chemotherapeutic drugs dosing strategies to reduce toxicities, suboptimal responses, and the risk of relapse. Most cancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic index with substantial pharmacokinetics variability. Yet, current dosing approaches do not fully account for the complex pathophysiological characteristics of the patients. In this regard, the effect of sex on anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs disposition is still underexplored. In this article, we review sex differences in chemotherapeutic drug pharmacokinetics, we suggest a novel approach that integrates sex into the traditional a priori body-surface-area (BSA) dosing selection model and finally, we provide an overview of the potential benefits of a broader use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology. Summary To date, anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs dosing is most often determined by BSA, a method widely used for of its ease-of-practice, despite criticism for not accounting for individual factors, notably sex. Anatomical, physiological, and biological differences between males and females can affect pharmacokinetics, including drug metabolism and clearance. At equivalent doses, females tend to display higher circulating exposure and more organ toxicities, which has been formally demonstrated at present for about 20% of chemotherapeutic drugs. An alternative could be the Sex-Adjusted-BSA (SA-BSA), incorporating a 10% increase in dosing for males and a 10% decrease for females, though this approach still lacks formal clinical validation. Another strategy to reduce treatment-related toxicity and potentially enhance clinical outcomes could be a more widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), for which a benefit has been demonstrated for 5-fluorouracil, busulfan, methotrexate or thiopurines.</p>","PeriodicalId":10047,"journal":{"name":"Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of sex-dependent differences for dosing selection and optimization of chemotherapeutic drugs.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Seydoux, Myriam Briki, Anna D Wagner, Eva Choong, Monia Guidi, Sandro Carrara, Yann Thoma, Françoise Livio, François R Girardin, Catia Marzolini, Thierry Buclin, Laurent A Decosterd\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Despite major advances in cancer treatment in the past years, there is a need to optimize chemotherapeutic drugs dosing strategies to reduce toxicities, suboptimal responses, and the risk of relapse. Most cancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic index with substantial pharmacokinetics variability. Yet, current dosing approaches do not fully account for the complex pathophysiological characteristics of the patients. In this regard, the effect of sex on anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs disposition is still underexplored. In this article, we review sex differences in chemotherapeutic drug pharmacokinetics, we suggest a novel approach that integrates sex into the traditional a priori body-surface-area (BSA) dosing selection model and finally, we provide an overview of the potential benefits of a broader use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology. Summary To date, anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs dosing is most often determined by BSA, a method widely used for of its ease-of-practice, despite criticism for not accounting for individual factors, notably sex. Anatomical, physiological, and biological differences between males and females can affect pharmacokinetics, including drug metabolism and clearance. At equivalent doses, females tend to display higher circulating exposure and more organ toxicities, which has been formally demonstrated at present for about 20% of chemotherapeutic drugs. An alternative could be the Sex-Adjusted-BSA (SA-BSA), incorporating a 10% increase in dosing for males and a 10% decrease for females, though this approach still lacks formal clinical validation. Another strategy to reduce treatment-related toxicity and potentially enhance clinical outcomes could be a more widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), for which a benefit has been demonstrated for 5-fluorouracil, busulfan, methotrexate or thiopurines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 尽管过去几年癌症治疗取得了重大进展,但仍需要优化化疗药物剂量策略,以减少毒性、次优反应和复发风险。大多数抗癌药物的治疗指数较窄,药代动力学变化较大。然而,目前的给药方法并没有充分考虑到患者复杂的病理生理特点。在这方面,性别对抗癌化疗药物处置的影响仍未得到充分探讨。在本文中,我们回顾了化疗药物药代动力学中的性别差异,提出了一种将性别纳入传统先验体表面积(BSA)剂量选择模型的新方法,最后概述了在肿瘤学中更广泛使用治疗药物监测(TDM)的潜在益处。摘要迄今为止,抗癌化疗药物的剂量通常由 BSA 决定,这种方法因其简便易行而被广泛使用,尽管有人批评它没有考虑个体因素,尤其是性别因素。男性和女性在解剖、生理和生物方面的差异会影响药代动力学,包括药物代谢和清除。在同等剂量下,女性的循环暴露量往往更高,器官毒性也更大,目前约有 20% 的化疗药物已正式证实了这一点。另一种替代方法是性别调整后BSA(SA-BSA),即男性剂量增加10%,女性剂量减少10%,但这种方法仍缺乏正式的临床验证。减少治疗相关毒性并提高临床疗效的另一种策略是更广泛地使用治疗药物监测(TDM),5-氟尿嘧啶、丁螺环素、甲氨蝶呤或硫嘌呤类药物的使用效果已得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Importance of sex-dependent differences for dosing selection and optimization of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Background Despite major advances in cancer treatment in the past years, there is a need to optimize chemotherapeutic drugs dosing strategies to reduce toxicities, suboptimal responses, and the risk of relapse. Most cancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic index with substantial pharmacokinetics variability. Yet, current dosing approaches do not fully account for the complex pathophysiological characteristics of the patients. In this regard, the effect of sex on anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs disposition is still underexplored. In this article, we review sex differences in chemotherapeutic drug pharmacokinetics, we suggest a novel approach that integrates sex into the traditional a priori body-surface-area (BSA) dosing selection model and finally, we provide an overview of the potential benefits of a broader use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology. Summary To date, anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs dosing is most often determined by BSA, a method widely used for of its ease-of-practice, despite criticism for not accounting for individual factors, notably sex. Anatomical, physiological, and biological differences between males and females can affect pharmacokinetics, including drug metabolism and clearance. At equivalent doses, females tend to display higher circulating exposure and more organ toxicities, which has been formally demonstrated at present for about 20% of chemotherapeutic drugs. An alternative could be the Sex-Adjusted-BSA (SA-BSA), incorporating a 10% increase in dosing for males and a 10% decrease for females, though this approach still lacks formal clinical validation. Another strategy to reduce treatment-related toxicity and potentially enhance clinical outcomes could be a more widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), for which a benefit has been demonstrated for 5-fluorouracil, busulfan, methotrexate or thiopurines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original research articles and state-of-the-art reviews on all aspects of antimicrobial and antitumor chemotherapy. The results of experimental and clinical investigations into the microbiological and pharmacologic properties of antibacterial, antiviral and antitumor compounds are major topics of publication. Papers selected for the journal offer data concerning the efficacy, toxicology, and interactions of new drugs in single or combined applications. Studies designed to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of similar preparations and comparing their efficacy are also included. Special emphasis is given to the development of drug-resistance, an increasing problem worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Phase I clinical study of a multi-kinase inhibitor TG02 capsule for the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas with failed temozolomide treatment in Chinese patients. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the duodenum: a case report and literature review. Predicting reprisal of solid cancer treatment and 60-month survival after Medical Intensive Care. A single-centre cohort study. Importance of sex-dependent differences for dosing selection and optimization of chemotherapeutic drugs. Gaza's First Polio Case in 25 Years: Is Health Infrastructure Collapse Threatening Resilience?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1