Alice Burchett, Saeed Siri, Jun Li, Xin Lu, Meenal Datta
{"title":"新型三维巨噬细胞球体模型揭示免疫机械应力与机械免疫反应的相互调控关系","authors":"Alice Burchett, Saeed Siri, Jun Li, Xin Lu, Meenal Datta","doi":"10.1007/s12195-024-00824-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In many diseases, an overabundance of macrophages contributes to adverse outcomes. While numerous studies have compared macrophage phenotype after mechanical stimulation or with varying local stiffness, it is unclear if and how macrophages directly contribute to mechanical forces in their microenvironment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Raw 264.7 murine macrophages were embedded in a confining agarose gel, and proliferated to form spheroids over days/weeks. Gels were synthesized at various concentrations to tune stiffness and were shown to support cell viability and spheroid growth. These cell-agarose constructs were treated with media supplements to promote macrophage polarization. Spheroid geometries were used to computationally model the strain generated in the agarose by macrophage spheroid growth. Agarose-embedded macrophages were analyzed for viability, spheroid size, stress generation, and gene expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Macrophages form spheroids and generate growth-induced mechanical forces (i.e., solid stress) within confining agarose gels, which can be maintained for at least 16 days in culture. Increasing agarose concentration increases gel stiffness, restricts spheroid expansion, limits gel deformation, and causes a decrease in Ki67 expression. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation increases spheroid growth, though this effect is reversed with the addition of IFNγ. The mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and TRPV4 have reduced expression with increased stiffness, externally applied compression, LPS stimulation, and M1-like polarization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macrophages alone both respond to and generate solid stress. Understanding how macrophage generation of growth-induced solid stress responds to different environmental conditions will help to inform treatment strategies for the plethora of diseases that involve macrophage accumulation and inflammation.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-024-00824-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":9687,"journal":{"name":"Cellular and molecular bioengineering","volume":"17 5","pages":"329-344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel 3-D Macrophage Spheroid Model Reveals Reciprocal Regulation of Immunomechanical Stress and Mechano-Immunological Response.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Burchett, Saeed Siri, Jun Li, Xin Lu, Meenal Datta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12195-024-00824-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In many diseases, an overabundance of macrophages contributes to adverse outcomes. While numerous studies have compared macrophage phenotype after mechanical stimulation or with varying local stiffness, it is unclear if and how macrophages directly contribute to mechanical forces in their microenvironment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Raw 264.7 murine macrophages were embedded in a confining agarose gel, and proliferated to form spheroids over days/weeks. Gels were synthesized at various concentrations to tune stiffness and were shown to support cell viability and spheroid growth. These cell-agarose constructs were treated with media supplements to promote macrophage polarization. Spheroid geometries were used to computationally model the strain generated in the agarose by macrophage spheroid growth. Agarose-embedded macrophages were analyzed for viability, spheroid size, stress generation, and gene expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Macrophages form spheroids and generate growth-induced mechanical forces (i.e., solid stress) within confining agarose gels, which can be maintained for at least 16 days in culture. Increasing agarose concentration increases gel stiffness, restricts spheroid expansion, limits gel deformation, and causes a decrease in Ki67 expression. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation increases spheroid growth, though this effect is reversed with the addition of IFNγ. The mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and TRPV4 have reduced expression with increased stiffness, externally applied compression, LPS stimulation, and M1-like polarization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macrophages alone both respond to and generate solid stress. Understanding how macrophage generation of growth-induced solid stress responds to different environmental conditions will help to inform treatment strategies for the plethora of diseases that involve macrophage accumulation and inflammation.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-024-00824-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellular and molecular bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"329-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellular and molecular bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-024-00824-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular and molecular bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-024-00824-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel 3-D Macrophage Spheroid Model Reveals Reciprocal Regulation of Immunomechanical Stress and Mechano-Immunological Response.
Purpose: In many diseases, an overabundance of macrophages contributes to adverse outcomes. While numerous studies have compared macrophage phenotype after mechanical stimulation or with varying local stiffness, it is unclear if and how macrophages directly contribute to mechanical forces in their microenvironment.
Methods: Raw 264.7 murine macrophages were embedded in a confining agarose gel, and proliferated to form spheroids over days/weeks. Gels were synthesized at various concentrations to tune stiffness and were shown to support cell viability and spheroid growth. These cell-agarose constructs were treated with media supplements to promote macrophage polarization. Spheroid geometries were used to computationally model the strain generated in the agarose by macrophage spheroid growth. Agarose-embedded macrophages were analyzed for viability, spheroid size, stress generation, and gene expression.
Results: Macrophages form spheroids and generate growth-induced mechanical forces (i.e., solid stress) within confining agarose gels, which can be maintained for at least 16 days in culture. Increasing agarose concentration increases gel stiffness, restricts spheroid expansion, limits gel deformation, and causes a decrease in Ki67 expression. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation increases spheroid growth, though this effect is reversed with the addition of IFNγ. The mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and TRPV4 have reduced expression with increased stiffness, externally applied compression, LPS stimulation, and M1-like polarization.
Conclusions: Macrophages alone both respond to and generate solid stress. Understanding how macrophage generation of growth-induced solid stress responds to different environmental conditions will help to inform treatment strategies for the plethora of diseases that involve macrophage accumulation and inflammation.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-024-00824-z.
期刊介绍:
The field of cellular and molecular bioengineering seeks to understand, so that we may ultimately control, the mechanical, chemical, and electrical processes of the cell. A key challenge in improving human health is to understand how cellular behavior arises from molecular-level interactions. CMBE, an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishes original research and review papers in the following seven general areas:
Molecular: DNA-protein/RNA-protein interactions, protein folding and function, protein-protein and receptor-ligand interactions, lipids, polysaccharides, molecular motors, and the biophysics of macromolecules that function as therapeutics or engineered matrices, for example.
Cellular: Studies of how cells sense physicochemical events surrounding and within cells, and how cells transduce these events into biological responses. Specific cell processes of interest include cell growth, differentiation, migration, signal transduction, protein secretion and transport, gene expression and regulation, and cell-matrix interactions.
Mechanobiology: The mechanical properties of cells and biomolecules, cellular/molecular force generation and adhesion, the response of cells to their mechanical microenvironment, and mechanotransduction in response to various physical forces such as fluid shear stress.
Nanomedicine: The engineering of nanoparticles for advanced drug delivery and molecular imaging applications, with particular focus on the interaction of such particles with living cells. Also, the application of nanostructured materials to control the behavior of cells and biomolecules.