{"title":"阑尾混合性腺内分泌癌:右半结肠切除术比阑尾切除术有生存优势吗?","authors":"Yulong Hou, Zhenhua Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>the surgical treatment and prognostic characteristics of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) of the appendix are not yet available. In this study, we sought to figure out the choice of surgical approach (right hemicolectomy versus appendectomy), and explore the effect of chemotherapy on appendiceal MANEC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>patients with appendiceal MANEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2020) were stratified by gender, race, age group, tumor grade, and TNM stage. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses relating TNM stage, grade, and receipt of right hemicolectomy (abbreviated as colectomy) to overall and cancer-specific survival were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>455 patients with appendiceal MANEC were included, of whom 146(32 %) underwent appendectomy and 309(68 %) underwent colectomy. Patients who underwent colectomy had better cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.68, 95%CI (0.47–0.98), P = 0.041) and overall survival (HR = 0.67, 95%CI (0.48–0.93), P = 0.015) than those who underwent appendectomy alone. However, colectomy did not confer any survival advantage over appendectomy in subgroup analyses, including low-grade or high-grade tumors, T1-2N0M0 group, T3-4N0M0 group, node-positive non-metastatic tumors, and metastatic tumors. On multivariate analysis, lack of chemotherapy and high-stage (node-positive or metastatic) were associated with poorer overall survival; high-grade (grade 3–4) and high-stage were primary predictors of cancer-specific mortality. Furthermore, there was no significant association between colectomy and better survival, either overall survival or cancer specific survival, when accounting for tumor stage and grade.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study found that colectomy did not provide a survival benefit compared to appendectomy alone. Moreover, tumor stage and grade were independent determinants of cancer specific survival; chemotherapy and tumor stage were independent determinants of overall survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 109356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas of the appendix: Is there a survival advantage to right hemicolectomy over appendectomy?\",\"authors\":\"Yulong Hou, Zhenhua Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>the surgical treatment and prognostic characteristics of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) of the appendix are not yet available. In this study, we sought to figure out the choice of surgical approach (right hemicolectomy versus appendectomy), and explore the effect of chemotherapy on appendiceal MANEC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>patients with appendiceal MANEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2020) were stratified by gender, race, age group, tumor grade, and TNM stage. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses relating TNM stage, grade, and receipt of right hemicolectomy (abbreviated as colectomy) to overall and cancer-specific survival were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>455 patients with appendiceal MANEC were included, of whom 146(32 %) underwent appendectomy and 309(68 %) underwent colectomy. Patients who underwent colectomy had better cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.68, 95%CI (0.47–0.98), P = 0.041) and overall survival (HR = 0.67, 95%CI (0.48–0.93), P = 0.015) than those who underwent appendectomy alone. However, colectomy did not confer any survival advantage over appendectomy in subgroup analyses, including low-grade or high-grade tumors, T1-2N0M0 group, T3-4N0M0 group, node-positive non-metastatic tumors, and metastatic tumors. On multivariate analysis, lack of chemotherapy and high-stage (node-positive or metastatic) were associated with poorer overall survival; high-grade (grade 3–4) and high-stage were primary predictors of cancer-specific mortality. Furthermore, there was no significant association between colectomy and better survival, either overall survival or cancer specific survival, when accounting for tumor stage and grade.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study found that colectomy did not provide a survival benefit compared to appendectomy alone. Moreover, tumor stage and grade were independent determinants of cancer specific survival; chemotherapy and tumor stage were independent determinants of overall survival.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 109356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324014240\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324014240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas of the appendix: Is there a survival advantage to right hemicolectomy over appendectomy?
Background
the surgical treatment and prognostic characteristics of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) of the appendix are not yet available. In this study, we sought to figure out the choice of surgical approach (right hemicolectomy versus appendectomy), and explore the effect of chemotherapy on appendiceal MANEC.
Methods
patients with appendiceal MANEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2020) were stratified by gender, race, age group, tumor grade, and TNM stage. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses relating TNM stage, grade, and receipt of right hemicolectomy (abbreviated as colectomy) to overall and cancer-specific survival were performed.
Results
455 patients with appendiceal MANEC were included, of whom 146(32 %) underwent appendectomy and 309(68 %) underwent colectomy. Patients who underwent colectomy had better cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.68, 95%CI (0.47–0.98), P = 0.041) and overall survival (HR = 0.67, 95%CI (0.48–0.93), P = 0.015) than those who underwent appendectomy alone. However, colectomy did not confer any survival advantage over appendectomy in subgroup analyses, including low-grade or high-grade tumors, T1-2N0M0 group, T3-4N0M0 group, node-positive non-metastatic tumors, and metastatic tumors. On multivariate analysis, lack of chemotherapy and high-stage (node-positive or metastatic) were associated with poorer overall survival; high-grade (grade 3–4) and high-stage were primary predictors of cancer-specific mortality. Furthermore, there was no significant association between colectomy and better survival, either overall survival or cancer specific survival, when accounting for tumor stage and grade.
Conclusions
Our study found that colectomy did not provide a survival benefit compared to appendectomy alone. Moreover, tumor stage and grade were independent determinants of cancer specific survival; chemotherapy and tumor stage were independent determinants of overall survival.
期刊介绍:
JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery.
The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.