艾司他敏鼻腔喷雾剂对难治性抑郁症患者认知能力的影响:四项第三阶段研究的结果

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/ijnp/pyae046
Randall L Morrison, Jaskaran Singh, Ella Daly, Maggie Fedgchin, Rachel Ochs-Ross, Keith Karcher, Rosanne Lane, Kim Cooper, Gerard Sanacora, Paul Maruff, Wayne C Drevets
{"title":"艾司他敏鼻腔喷雾剂对难治性抑郁症患者认知能力的影响:四项第三阶段研究的结果","authors":"Randall L Morrison, Jaskaran Singh, Ella Daly, Maggie Fedgchin, Rachel Ochs-Ross, Keith Karcher, Rosanne Lane, Kim Cooper, Gerard Sanacora, Paul Maruff, Wayne C Drevets","doi":"10.1093/ijnp/pyae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While esketamine is effective in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), detailed information about the effect of esketamine on cognition is relatively scarce. This analysis assessed the effect of short-term (3 double-blind [DB] studies: DB1, DB2, and DB4) or long-term maintenance treatment (DB3) with esketamine nasal spray (ESK) compared with a placebo (PBO) combined with active-comparator, on cognition in patients with TRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (DB1/DB2/DB3: [18-64 years, n = 747]; DB4: [65 years or older, n = 137]) with TRD received ESK (DB1/DB2/DB3: 56/84 mg; DB4: 28/56/84 mg) or PBO+newly initiated oral antidepressant (OAD) as per treatment schedules. Cognitive assessments-Cogstate battery and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised-were administered at baseline, Day 28/early withdrawal, and follow-up visits in DB1/DB2/DB4 and at 12-week intervals in the DB3 maintenance phase. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze ESK effects on cognition with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals to express the nature and magnitude of treatment effects relative to active-comparator+PBO. Correlation between depression severity (Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale scores [MADRS]) and cognition was assessed at baseline and endpoint(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, mild-to-moderate impairment in psychomotor function, attention, and memory (working and episodic) were evident. For each DB1/DB2/DB4, group mean performance in Z-scores for ESK+OAD and OAD+PBO groups on all cognitive tests remained similar or slightly improved from baseline at endpoint (Day 28) and follow-up assessments. Similarly, in DB3 (maintenance phase), both groups generally showed improvement in cognitive performance at endpoint(s). Correlations between MADRS scores and performance on the cognitive test battery were small at baseline and endpoint(s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis did not identify evidence of negative effects on cognition following short-term or long-term maintenance treatment with ESK+OAD in patients with TRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Esketamine Nasal Spray on Cognition in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results From Four Phase 3 Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Randall L Morrison, Jaskaran Singh, Ella Daly, Maggie Fedgchin, Rachel Ochs-Ross, Keith Karcher, Rosanne Lane, Kim Cooper, Gerard Sanacora, Paul Maruff, Wayne C Drevets\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijnp/pyae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While esketamine is effective in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), detailed information about the effect of esketamine on cognition is relatively scarce. This analysis assessed the effect of short-term (3 double-blind [DB] studies: DB1, DB2, and DB4) or long-term maintenance treatment (DB3) with esketamine nasal spray (ESK) compared with a placebo (PBO) combined with active-comparator, on cognition in patients with TRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (DB1/DB2/DB3: [18-64 years, n = 747]; DB4: [65 years or older, n = 137]) with TRD received ESK (DB1/DB2/DB3: 56/84 mg; DB4: 28/56/84 mg) or PBO+newly initiated oral antidepressant (OAD) as per treatment schedules. Cognitive assessments-Cogstate battery and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised-were administered at baseline, Day 28/early withdrawal, and follow-up visits in DB1/DB2/DB4 and at 12-week intervals in the DB3 maintenance phase. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze ESK effects on cognition with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals to express the nature and magnitude of treatment effects relative to active-comparator+PBO. Correlation between depression severity (Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale scores [MADRS]) and cognition was assessed at baseline and endpoint(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, mild-to-moderate impairment in psychomotor function, attention, and memory (working and episodic) were evident. For each DB1/DB2/DB4, group mean performance in Z-scores for ESK+OAD and OAD+PBO groups on all cognitive tests remained similar or slightly improved from baseline at endpoint (Day 28) and follow-up assessments. Similarly, in DB3 (maintenance phase), both groups generally showed improvement in cognitive performance at endpoint(s). Correlations between MADRS scores and performance on the cognitive test battery were small at baseline and endpoint(s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis did not identify evidence of negative effects on cognition following short-term or long-term maintenance treatment with ESK+OAD in patients with TRD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyae046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyae046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然埃斯氯胺酮对治疗耐受性抑郁症(TRD)有效,但有关埃斯氯胺酮对认知影响的详细信息却相对较少。本分析评估了埃斯氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂(ESK)短期(三项双盲[DB]研究:DB1、DB2和DB4)或长期维持治疗(DB3)与活性比较剂+安慰剂(PBO)相比,对TRD患者认知能力的影响:TRD患者(DB1/DB2/DB3:[18-64岁,n=747];DB4:[≥65岁,n=137])按照治疗计划接受ESK(DB1/DB2/DB3:56/84mg;DB4:28/56/84mg)或PBO+新开始的口服抗抑郁药(OAD)。在DB1/DB2/DB4的基线、第28天/戒断早期和随访以及DB3维持阶段的12周间隔期内,进行认知评估--Cogstate电池和霍普金斯言语学习测试-修订版。描述性统计用于分析 ESK 对认知能力的影响,效应大小和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 用于表示相对于活性对比剂+PBO 治疗效果的性质/程度。评估了基线和终点时抑郁严重程度(MADRS评分)与认知能力之间的相关性:基线时,精神运动功能、注意力和记忆力(工作/表象)明显受到轻度至中度损害。在DB1/DB2/DB4中,ESK+OAD组和OAD+PBO组在所有认知测试中的z-分数平均成绩在终点(第28天)和随访评估中与基线相比保持相似/略有改善。同样,在 DB3(仅限于年龄≥65 岁的参与者)中,两组在终点时的认知表现都普遍有所改善。在基线和终点,MADRS评分与认知测试成绩之间的相关性较小:本分析未发现TRD患者接受ESK+OAD短期或长期维持治疗后对认知能力产生负面影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Esketamine Nasal Spray on Cognition in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results From Four Phase 3 Studies.

Background: While esketamine is effective in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), detailed information about the effect of esketamine on cognition is relatively scarce. This analysis assessed the effect of short-term (3 double-blind [DB] studies: DB1, DB2, and DB4) or long-term maintenance treatment (DB3) with esketamine nasal spray (ESK) compared with a placebo (PBO) combined with active-comparator, on cognition in patients with TRD.

Methods: Patients (DB1/DB2/DB3: [18-64 years, n = 747]; DB4: [65 years or older, n = 137]) with TRD received ESK (DB1/DB2/DB3: 56/84 mg; DB4: 28/56/84 mg) or PBO+newly initiated oral antidepressant (OAD) as per treatment schedules. Cognitive assessments-Cogstate battery and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised-were administered at baseline, Day 28/early withdrawal, and follow-up visits in DB1/DB2/DB4 and at 12-week intervals in the DB3 maintenance phase. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze ESK effects on cognition with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals to express the nature and magnitude of treatment effects relative to active-comparator+PBO. Correlation between depression severity (Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale scores [MADRS]) and cognition was assessed at baseline and endpoint(s).

Results: At baseline, mild-to-moderate impairment in psychomotor function, attention, and memory (working and episodic) were evident. For each DB1/DB2/DB4, group mean performance in Z-scores for ESK+OAD and OAD+PBO groups on all cognitive tests remained similar or slightly improved from baseline at endpoint (Day 28) and follow-up assessments. Similarly, in DB3 (maintenance phase), both groups generally showed improvement in cognitive performance at endpoint(s). Correlations between MADRS scores and performance on the cognitive test battery were small at baseline and endpoint(s).

Conclusions: This analysis did not identify evidence of negative effects on cognition following short-term or long-term maintenance treatment with ESK+OAD in patients with TRD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The central focus of the journal is on research that advances understanding of existing and new neuropsychopharmacological agents including their mode of action and clinical application or provides insights into the biological basis of psychiatric disorders and thereby advances their pharmacological treatment. Such research may derive from the full spectrum of biological and psychological fields of inquiry encompassing classical and novel techniques in neuropsychopharmacology as well as strategies such as neuroimaging, genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and neuropsychology.
期刊最新文献
Anhedonia is associated with a specific depression profile and poor antidepressant response. 17β-estradiol Ameliorates Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Aged Mice via miR-138-5p/SIRT1/HMGB1 Pathway. Risk of cognitive decline among patients with dengue virus infection: A systematic review. Epigenome-Wide DNA Methylation in Unipolar Depression: Predictive Biomarker of Antidepressant Treatment Response? Behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of cognitive control in humans and rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1