Andrew Cassar, Gabriella Montanaro, Bettina Booker, Mark A Sammut, Alexander Manche, Joseph F Galea
{"title":"主动脉瓣置换术患者围手术期阵发性心房颤动后的脑血管事件。","authors":"Andrew Cassar, Gabriella Montanaro, Bettina Booker, Mark A Sammut, Alexander Manche, Joseph F Galea","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06551-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common after aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the long-term risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events (CVA) associated with POAF in this scenario is not known. The study objective was to look at the long-term risk of stroke in patients undergoing AVR with POAF compared to those with no POAF, particularly in patients having a bioprosthetic valve and not discharged on anticoagulation. We also looked at the risk of peri-operative stroke and long-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 831 patients undergoing AVR were followed up for a median of 6.5 years. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CVA after discharge, comparing those with to those without POAF, after excluding patients with a past history of atrial fibrillation (AF). They were divided into two cohorts, those having bioprosthetic valves (without oral anticoagulation), and those with a mechanical valve (with oral anticoagulation). Other outcomes studied were the incidence of early perioperative CVA comparing patients with a history of AF to those with no history, and long-term mortality in the different cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no increased risk of long-term stroke in patients with POAF when compared to those without POAF, neither in bioprosthetic valves (adjusted HR 1.14; CI 95% 0.46-2.83, P=0.78)-nor in mechanical valves (adjusted HR 1.41; CI 95% 0.55-3.65, P=0.48). Patients with a history of AF had an increased risk of perioperative stroke (OR 1.5; CI 95% 1.3-13.8, P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR who develop POAF are not at an increased risk of stroke despite not being on any oral anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebrovascular events after perioperative paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Cassar, Gabriella Montanaro, Bettina Booker, Mark A Sammut, Alexander Manche, Joseph F Galea\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06551-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common after aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the long-term risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events (CVA) associated with POAF in this scenario is not known. The study objective was to look at the long-term risk of stroke in patients undergoing AVR with POAF compared to those with no POAF, particularly in patients having a bioprosthetic valve and not discharged on anticoagulation. We also looked at the risk of peri-operative stroke and long-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 831 patients undergoing AVR were followed up for a median of 6.5 years. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CVA after discharge, comparing those with to those without POAF, after excluding patients with a past history of atrial fibrillation (AF). They were divided into two cohorts, those having bioprosthetic valves (without oral anticoagulation), and those with a mechanical valve (with oral anticoagulation). Other outcomes studied were the incidence of early perioperative CVA comparing patients with a history of AF to those with no history, and long-term mortality in the different cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no increased risk of long-term stroke in patients with POAF when compared to those without POAF, neither in bioprosthetic valves (adjusted HR 1.14; CI 95% 0.46-2.83, P=0.78)-nor in mechanical valves (adjusted HR 1.41; CI 95% 0.55-3.65, P=0.48). Patients with a history of AF had an increased risk of perioperative stroke (OR 1.5; CI 95% 1.3-13.8, P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR who develop POAF are not at an increased risk of stroke despite not being on any oral anticoagulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06551-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06551-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cerebrovascular events after perioperative paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common after aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the long-term risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events (CVA) associated with POAF in this scenario is not known. The study objective was to look at the long-term risk of stroke in patients undergoing AVR with POAF compared to those with no POAF, particularly in patients having a bioprosthetic valve and not discharged on anticoagulation. We also looked at the risk of peri-operative stroke and long-term mortality.
Methods: A retrospective study of 831 patients undergoing AVR were followed up for a median of 6.5 years. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CVA after discharge, comparing those with to those without POAF, after excluding patients with a past history of atrial fibrillation (AF). They were divided into two cohorts, those having bioprosthetic valves (without oral anticoagulation), and those with a mechanical valve (with oral anticoagulation). Other outcomes studied were the incidence of early perioperative CVA comparing patients with a history of AF to those with no history, and long-term mortality in the different cohorts.
Results: There was no increased risk of long-term stroke in patients with POAF when compared to those without POAF, neither in bioprosthetic valves (adjusted HR 1.14; CI 95% 0.46-2.83, P=0.78)-nor in mechanical valves (adjusted HR 1.41; CI 95% 0.55-3.65, P=0.48). Patients with a history of AF had an increased risk of perioperative stroke (OR 1.5; CI 95% 1.3-13.8, P=0.01).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR who develop POAF are not at an increased risk of stroke despite not being on any oral anticoagulation.