在重症护理机构实施姑息关怀的可行性试验结果

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0264
Joan G Carpenter, Amy Jackson, Nancy Hodgson, Shijun Zhu, Merve Grulu, Laura C Hanson, Mary Ersek
{"title":"在重症护理机构实施姑息关怀的可行性试验结果","authors":"Joan G Carpenter, Amy Jackson, Nancy Hodgson, Shijun Zhu, Merve Grulu, Laura C Hanson, Mary Ersek","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Seriously ill older adults are admitted for post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for curative, rehabilitative treatments, yet experience high rates of re-hospitalization, and death. The primary palliative care in post-acute care (PPC-PAC) intervention is an evidence-based approach designed to help people with serious illness align treatment plans with goals of care, optimize quality of life, and improve satisfaction with their care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To conduct a preliminary study and evaluate the feasibility of implementing the PPC-PAC intervention in the post-acute care SNF setting. <b><i>Design</i></b>: Two-group, multisite feasibility pilot pragmatic clinical trial with a non-equivalent design. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Primary outcome measures-eligibility, enrollment, and data collection rates; consultation satisfaction; and fidelity. Effectiveness outcome measure-quality of life using the Palliative Outcomes Scale version 2. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Close to 70% of those who were eligible and approached by the study team (45/65) enrolled in the trial throughout 12 SNFs in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States. Thirty-five were enrolled from intervention sites; 10 were enrolled from control sites (usual care). Most participants (80%) expressed general satisfaction with PPC-PAC, and 90% of clinicians implemented the PPC-PAC intervention as intended. At 21 days follow-up, there were no significant differences in effectiveness outcomes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Implementation of the PPC-PAC intervention proved to be feasible and acceptable among older adults and clinicians. Future research should focus on testing the effectiveness of PPC-PAC and explore strategies for optimal intervention implementation and SNF staff engagement in the post-acute care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of a Feasibility Pilot Pragmatic Trial Implementing Palliative Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities.\",\"authors\":\"Joan G Carpenter, Amy Jackson, Nancy Hodgson, Shijun Zhu, Merve Grulu, Laura C Hanson, Mary Ersek\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Seriously ill older adults are admitted for post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for curative, rehabilitative treatments, yet experience high rates of re-hospitalization, and death. The primary palliative care in post-acute care (PPC-PAC) intervention is an evidence-based approach designed to help people with serious illness align treatment plans with goals of care, optimize quality of life, and improve satisfaction with their care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To conduct a preliminary study and evaluate the feasibility of implementing the PPC-PAC intervention in the post-acute care SNF setting. <b><i>Design</i></b>: Two-group, multisite feasibility pilot pragmatic clinical trial with a non-equivalent design. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Primary outcome measures-eligibility, enrollment, and data collection rates; consultation satisfaction; and fidelity. Effectiveness outcome measure-quality of life using the Palliative Outcomes Scale version 2. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Close to 70% of those who were eligible and approached by the study team (45/65) enrolled in the trial throughout 12 SNFs in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States. Thirty-five were enrolled from intervention sites; 10 were enrolled from control sites (usual care). Most participants (80%) expressed general satisfaction with PPC-PAC, and 90% of clinicians implemented the PPC-PAC intervention as intended. At 21 days follow-up, there were no significant differences in effectiveness outcomes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Implementation of the PPC-PAC intervention proved to be feasible and acceptable among older adults and clinicians. Future research should focus on testing the effectiveness of PPC-PAC and explore strategies for optimal intervention implementation and SNF staff engagement in the post-acute care setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0264\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:身患重病的老年人需要入住专业护理机构(SNF)接受治疗性和康复性的后期护理,但他们的再次住院率和死亡率却很高。急性期后护理中的初级姑息治疗(PPC-PAC)干预是一种基于证据的方法,旨在帮助重病患者根据护理目标调整治疗计划、优化生活质量并提高对护理的满意度。目标:开展一项初步研究,评估 PPC-PAC 干预的效果:开展一项初步研究,并评估在急性期后护理 SNF 环境中实施 PPC-PAC 干预的可行性。设计:两组、多地点可行性试点实用临床试验,采用非等效设计。测量:主要结果测量--合格率、注册率和数据收集率;咨询满意度和忠实度。有效性结果测量--使用姑息治疗结果量表第 2 版测量生活质量。结果:在美国东北部和大西洋中部的 12 家 SNF 中,有近 70% 的符合条件且与研究小组接触过的人(45/65)参加了试验。其中 35 人来自干预地点;10 人来自对照地点(常规护理)。大多数参与者(80%)对 PPC-PAC 表示基本满意,90% 的临床医生按照预期实施了 PPC-PAC 干预措施。在 21 天的随访中,疗效结果没有显著差异。结论:事实证明,PPC-PAC 干预措施的实施是可行的,并为老年人和临床医生所接受。未来的研究应侧重于测试 PPC-PAC 的有效性,并探索在急性期后护理环境中优化干预实施和 SNF 员工参与的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results of a Feasibility Pilot Pragmatic Trial Implementing Palliative Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Background: Seriously ill older adults are admitted for post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for curative, rehabilitative treatments, yet experience high rates of re-hospitalization, and death. The primary palliative care in post-acute care (PPC-PAC) intervention is an evidence-based approach designed to help people with serious illness align treatment plans with goals of care, optimize quality of life, and improve satisfaction with their care. Objectives: To conduct a preliminary study and evaluate the feasibility of implementing the PPC-PAC intervention in the post-acute care SNF setting. Design: Two-group, multisite feasibility pilot pragmatic clinical trial with a non-equivalent design. Measurements: Primary outcome measures-eligibility, enrollment, and data collection rates; consultation satisfaction; and fidelity. Effectiveness outcome measure-quality of life using the Palliative Outcomes Scale version 2. Results: Close to 70% of those who were eligible and approached by the study team (45/65) enrolled in the trial throughout 12 SNFs in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States. Thirty-five were enrolled from intervention sites; 10 were enrolled from control sites (usual care). Most participants (80%) expressed general satisfaction with PPC-PAC, and 90% of clinicians implemented the PPC-PAC intervention as intended. At 21 days follow-up, there were no significant differences in effectiveness outcomes. Conclusion: Implementation of the PPC-PAC intervention proved to be feasible and acceptable among older adults and clinicians. Future research should focus on testing the effectiveness of PPC-PAC and explore strategies for optimal intervention implementation and SNF staff engagement in the post-acute care setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes Toward Medical Assistance in Dying Among Swedish Palliative Care Professionals. Palliative Care and Intensivists' Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care. Patterns of Specialty Palliative Consultation for Patients Admitted to Surgical Services. Letter to the Editor: "No-Shows" and Missed Opportunities: Reasons for Missed In-Person and Telehealth Appointments in an Ambulatory Palliative Care Program. What Matters to Older Native Hawaiians?: A Qualitative Study of Care Preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1