Victoria Sieber, Thilo Rusche, Shan Yang, Bram Stieltjes, Urs Fischer, Stefano Trebeschi, Philippe Cattin, Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Johanna M Lieb, Peter B Sporns
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者脑部核磁共振成像的自动评估大大缩短了阅读时间。","authors":"Victoria Sieber, Thilo Rusche, Shan Yang, Bram Stieltjes, Urs Fischer, Stefano Trebeschi, Philippe Cattin, Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Johanna M Lieb, Peter B Sporns","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. We evaluate whether assessment of new, expanding, and contrast-enhancing MS lesions can be done more time-efficiently by radiologists with assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline and three follow-up (FU) MRIs of thirty-five consecutive patients diagnosed with MS were assessed by a radiologist manually, and with assistance of an AI-tool. Results were discussed with a consultant neuroradiologist and time metrics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reading time for the resident radiologist was 9.05 min (95CI: 6.85-11:25). With AI-assistance, the reading time was reduced by 2.83 min (95CI: 3.28-2.41, p < 0.001). The reading decreased steadily from baseline to FU3 for the resident radiologist (9.85 min baseline, 9.21 FU1, 8.64 FU2 and 8.44 FU3, p < 0.001). Assistance of AI further remarkably decreased reading times during follow-ups (3.29 min FU1, 3.92 FU2, 3.79 FU3, p < 0.001) but not at baseline (0.26 min, p = 0.96). The baseline reading time of the resident radiologist was 5.04 min (p < 0.001), with each lesion adding 0.14 min (p < 0.001). There was a substantial decrease in the baseline reading time from 5.04 min to 1.59 min (p = 0.23) with AI-assistance. Discussion of the reading results of the resident with the neuroradiology consultant (as usual in clinical routine) was exemplary done for FU-3 MRIs and added another 3 min (CI:2.27-3.76) to the reading time without AI-assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that AI-assisted reading of MRIs of patients with MS may be faster than evaluating these MRIs without AI-assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated assessment of brain MRIs in multiple sclerosis patients significantly reduces reading time.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Sieber, Thilo Rusche, Shan Yang, Bram Stieltjes, Urs Fischer, Stefano Trebeschi, Philippe Cattin, Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Johanna M Lieb, Peter B Sporns\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. We evaluate whether assessment of new, expanding, and contrast-enhancing MS lesions can be done more time-efficiently by radiologists with assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline and three follow-up (FU) MRIs of thirty-five consecutive patients diagnosed with MS were assessed by a radiologist manually, and with assistance of an AI-tool. Results were discussed with a consultant neuroradiologist and time metrics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reading time for the resident radiologist was 9.05 min (95CI: 6.85-11:25). With AI-assistance, the reading time was reduced by 2.83 min (95CI: 3.28-2.41, p < 0.001). The reading decreased steadily from baseline to FU3 for the resident radiologist (9.85 min baseline, 9.21 FU1, 8.64 FU2 and 8.44 FU3, p < 0.001). Assistance of AI further remarkably decreased reading times during follow-ups (3.29 min FU1, 3.92 FU2, 3.79 FU3, p < 0.001) but not at baseline (0.26 min, p = 0.96). The baseline reading time of the resident radiologist was 5.04 min (p < 0.001), with each lesion adding 0.14 min (p < 0.001). There was a substantial decrease in the baseline reading time from 5.04 min to 1.59 min (p = 0.23) with AI-assistance. Discussion of the reading results of the resident with the neuroradiology consultant (as usual in clinical routine) was exemplary done for FU-3 MRIs and added another 3 min (CI:2.27-3.76) to the reading time without AI-assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that AI-assisted reading of MRIs of patients with MS may be faster than evaluating these MRIs without AI-assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03497-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated assessment of brain MRIs in multiple sclerosis patients significantly reduces reading time.
Introduction: Assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. We evaluate whether assessment of new, expanding, and contrast-enhancing MS lesions can be done more time-efficiently by radiologists with assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).
Methods: Baseline and three follow-up (FU) MRIs of thirty-five consecutive patients diagnosed with MS were assessed by a radiologist manually, and with assistance of an AI-tool. Results were discussed with a consultant neuroradiologist and time metrics were evaluated.
Results: The mean reading time for the resident radiologist was 9.05 min (95CI: 6.85-11:25). With AI-assistance, the reading time was reduced by 2.83 min (95CI: 3.28-2.41, p < 0.001). The reading decreased steadily from baseline to FU3 for the resident radiologist (9.85 min baseline, 9.21 FU1, 8.64 FU2 and 8.44 FU3, p < 0.001). Assistance of AI further remarkably decreased reading times during follow-ups (3.29 min FU1, 3.92 FU2, 3.79 FU3, p < 0.001) but not at baseline (0.26 min, p = 0.96). The baseline reading time of the resident radiologist was 5.04 min (p < 0.001), with each lesion adding 0.14 min (p < 0.001). There was a substantial decrease in the baseline reading time from 5.04 min to 1.59 min (p = 0.23) with AI-assistance. Discussion of the reading results of the resident with the neuroradiology consultant (as usual in clinical routine) was exemplary done for FU-3 MRIs and added another 3 min (CI:2.27-3.76) to the reading time without AI-assistance.
Conclusion: We found that AI-assisted reading of MRIs of patients with MS may be faster than evaluating these MRIs without AI-assistance.