基于模拟的临床事件汇报培训可提高领导绩效。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003264
Arianne Cuff L Baker, Michael C Monuteaux, Paul C Mullan, Joshua Nagler, Kate Dorney
{"title":"基于模拟的临床事件汇报培训可提高领导绩效。","authors":"Arianne Cuff L Baker, Michael C Monuteaux, Paul C Mullan, Joshua Nagler, Kate Dorney","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical event debriefing (CED) improves healthcare team performance and patient outcomes. Most pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians do not receive formal training in leading CED. Our objectives were to develop a CED curriculum and evaluate its effect on performance, knowledge, comfort, and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single group pre-post-retention study. We developed a hybrid curriculum with simulation, an interactive module, and individual feedback. We invited faculty and fellows from the PEM division of our hospital to participate. During an in-person training day, participants led standardized clinical simulation scenarios followed by simulated CED with immediate feedback on their leadership performance. They watched an interactive module between scenarios. Participants returned for a retention assessment 2-6 months later with a third simulation and debrief. Participants completed surveys measuring attitudes, experiences, and knowledge. Participants also evaluated the curriculum.The primary outcome was CED leadership performance using a novel 21-item tool that we developed, the Debrief Leadership Tool for Assessment (DELTA). A blinded, trained rater measured performance with DELTA. Secondary outcomes included changes in knowledge and comfort and changes in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants enrolled and completed all parts of the curriculum and assessments. Debrief leadership performance improved by a mean of 3.7 points on DELTA pre-training to post-training (95% confidence interval = 2.7, 4.6, P < 0.01) and by 1.4 points from pre-training to retention (95% confidence interval = 0.1, 2.8, P = 0.03). Knowledge and comfort also significantly improved from pre-training to post-training and were sustained at retention. Most (67%) participants changed their clinical practice of CED after completing the curriculum. All participants would recommend the training to other PEM physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A hybrid simulation-based curriculum in leading CED for PEM physicians was associated with improvement in CED leadership performance, knowledge, and comfort. PEM physicians incorporated training into their clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-Based Training in Clinical Event Debriefing Improves Leadership Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Arianne Cuff L Baker, Michael C Monuteaux, Paul C Mullan, Joshua Nagler, Kate Dorney\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical event debriefing (CED) improves healthcare team performance and patient outcomes. Most pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians do not receive formal training in leading CED. Our objectives were to develop a CED curriculum and evaluate its effect on performance, knowledge, comfort, and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single group pre-post-retention study. We developed a hybrid curriculum with simulation, an interactive module, and individual feedback. We invited faculty and fellows from the PEM division of our hospital to participate. During an in-person training day, participants led standardized clinical simulation scenarios followed by simulated CED with immediate feedback on their leadership performance. They watched an interactive module between scenarios. Participants returned for a retention assessment 2-6 months later with a third simulation and debrief. Participants completed surveys measuring attitudes, experiences, and knowledge. Participants also evaluated the curriculum.The primary outcome was CED leadership performance using a novel 21-item tool that we developed, the Debrief Leadership Tool for Assessment (DELTA). A blinded, trained rater measured performance with DELTA. Secondary outcomes included changes in knowledge and comfort and changes in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants enrolled and completed all parts of the curriculum and assessments. Debrief leadership performance improved by a mean of 3.7 points on DELTA pre-training to post-training (95% confidence interval = 2.7, 4.6, P < 0.01) and by 1.4 points from pre-training to retention (95% confidence interval = 0.1, 2.8, P = 0.03). Knowledge and comfort also significantly improved from pre-training to post-training and were sustained at retention. Most (67%) participants changed their clinical practice of CED after completing the curriculum. All participants would recommend the training to other PEM physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A hybrid simulation-based curriculum in leading CED for PEM physicians was associated with improvement in CED leadership performance, knowledge, and comfort. PEM physicians incorporated training into their clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003264\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床事件汇报(CED)可提高医疗团队的绩效和患者的治疗效果。大多数儿科急诊医学(PEM)医生都没有接受过引导 CED 的正规培训。我们的目标是开发一套 CED 课程,并评估其对绩效、知识、舒适度和临床实践的影响:这是一项单组前-后-保留研究。我们开发了一种混合课程,包括模拟、互动模块和个人反馈。我们邀请了本医院 PEM 部门的教师和研究员参加。在为期一天的面授培训中,学员们先领导标准化临床模拟情景,然后进行模拟 CED,并对他们的领导表现进行即时反馈。在情景模拟之间,他们还观看了互动模块。2-6 个月后,参与者再次参加培训,进行第三次模拟和汇报。参与者完成了对态度、经验和知识的调查。主要结果是使用我们开发的 21 个项目的新工具--汇报领导力评估工具 (DELTA),对 CED 领导力表现进行评估。由一名经过培训的盲人评分员使用 DELTA 测评表现。次要结果包括知识和舒适度的变化以及临床实践的变化:结果:27 名参与者参加并完成了课程和评估的所有部分。从培训前到培训后,DELTA的汇报领导能力平均提高了3.7分(95%置信区间=2.7, 4.6, P < 0.01),从培训前到保留期间平均提高了1.4分(95%置信区间=0.1, 2.8, P = 0.03)。从培训前到培训后,知识水平和舒适度也有了明显提高,并在保留培训资格时得以保持。大多数学员(67%)在完成课程后改变了他们的 CED 临床实践。所有参与者都会向其他急诊科医生推荐该培训:结论:针对急诊科医生的CED领导力混合模拟课程与CED领导力表现、知识和舒适度的提高有关。PEM 医生将培训融入了他们的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulation-Based Training in Clinical Event Debriefing Improves Leadership Performance.

Objectives: Clinical event debriefing (CED) improves healthcare team performance and patient outcomes. Most pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians do not receive formal training in leading CED. Our objectives were to develop a CED curriculum and evaluate its effect on performance, knowledge, comfort, and clinical practice.

Methods: This was a single group pre-post-retention study. We developed a hybrid curriculum with simulation, an interactive module, and individual feedback. We invited faculty and fellows from the PEM division of our hospital to participate. During an in-person training day, participants led standardized clinical simulation scenarios followed by simulated CED with immediate feedback on their leadership performance. They watched an interactive module between scenarios. Participants returned for a retention assessment 2-6 months later with a third simulation and debrief. Participants completed surveys measuring attitudes, experiences, and knowledge. Participants also evaluated the curriculum.The primary outcome was CED leadership performance using a novel 21-item tool that we developed, the Debrief Leadership Tool for Assessment (DELTA). A blinded, trained rater measured performance with DELTA. Secondary outcomes included changes in knowledge and comfort and changes in clinical practice.

Results: Twenty-seven participants enrolled and completed all parts of the curriculum and assessments. Debrief leadership performance improved by a mean of 3.7 points on DELTA pre-training to post-training (95% confidence interval = 2.7, 4.6, P < 0.01) and by 1.4 points from pre-training to retention (95% confidence interval = 0.1, 2.8, P = 0.03). Knowledge and comfort also significantly improved from pre-training to post-training and were sustained at retention. Most (67%) participants changed their clinical practice of CED after completing the curriculum. All participants would recommend the training to other PEM physicians.

Conclusions: A hybrid simulation-based curriculum in leading CED for PEM physicians was associated with improvement in CED leadership performance, knowledge, and comfort. PEM physicians incorporated training into their clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1