中风后痴呆症患者是否接受高强度他汀类药物治疗?一项基于人群的队列研究。

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70165
Leonie Picton, Johnson George, J. Simon Bell, Jenni Ilomäki
{"title":"中风后痴呆症患者是否接受高强度他汀类药物治疗?一项基于人群的队列研究。","authors":"Leonie Picton,&nbsp;Johnson George,&nbsp;J. Simon Bell,&nbsp;Jenni Ilomäki","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This Australian population-based study investigated statin intensity after hospitalization for ischemic stroke in a matched cohort of people living with and without dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified all patients aged ≥ 30 years hospitalized in the state of Victoria, Australia, for ischemic stroke from July 1, 2013 to April 30, 2018 from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Data set. People with dementia were matched 1:4 for sex, 5-year age group and index date ± 90 days with people without dementia. Records of statin dispensing within 60 days postdischarge were extracted from prescription claims data. The intensity of the first postdischarge statin dispensing was determined. Odds ratios for high versus low-moderate intensity and no statin dispensing were estimated using multinomial logistic regression adjusted for factors including age, sex, and comorbidity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The cohorts comprised 11,105 people (dementia: <i>N</i> = 2221; without dementia: <i>N</i> = 8884 and 52% were female. Compared to people without dementia, people with dementia had 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%–44%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus a low-moderate intensity statin and 54% (95% CI: 48%–59%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin. Compared to men, women with and without dementia had 16% (95% CI: 5%–25%) lower odds of receiving a high- versus low-moderate intensity statin and 28% (95% CI: 19%–35%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>People living with dementia are less likely to receive high-intensity statins post-discharge compared to people without dementia. There is a gender gap in receipt of guideline-recommended high-intensity statin therapy for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Guidelines recommend all people with reasonable life expectancy receive a high-intensity statin after stroke to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events. More research is needed to understand why people living with dementia might not receive guideline recommended care, and how statin use and statin intensity impact the health outcomes of people living with dementia and stroke.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are People Living With Dementia Receiving High Intensity Statin Therapy After Stroke? A Population-Based Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Leonie Picton,&nbsp;Johnson George,&nbsp;J. Simon Bell,&nbsp;Jenni Ilomäki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This Australian population-based study investigated statin intensity after hospitalization for ischemic stroke in a matched cohort of people living with and without dementia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified all patients aged ≥ 30 years hospitalized in the state of Victoria, Australia, for ischemic stroke from July 1, 2013 to April 30, 2018 from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Data set. People with dementia were matched 1:4 for sex, 5-year age group and index date ± 90 days with people without dementia. Records of statin dispensing within 60 days postdischarge were extracted from prescription claims data. The intensity of the first postdischarge statin dispensing was determined. Odds ratios for high versus low-moderate intensity and no statin dispensing were estimated using multinomial logistic regression adjusted for factors including age, sex, and comorbidity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The cohorts comprised 11,105 people (dementia: <i>N</i> = 2221; without dementia: <i>N</i> = 8884 and 52% were female. Compared to people without dementia, people with dementia had 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%–44%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus a low-moderate intensity statin and 54% (95% CI: 48%–59%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin. Compared to men, women with and without dementia had 16% (95% CI: 5%–25%) lower odds of receiving a high- versus low-moderate intensity statin and 28% (95% CI: 19%–35%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>People living with dementia are less likely to receive high-intensity statins post-discharge compared to people without dementia. There is a gender gap in receipt of guideline-recommended high-intensity statin therapy for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Guidelines recommend all people with reasonable life expectancy receive a high-intensity statin after stroke to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events. More research is needed to understand why people living with dementia might not receive guideline recommended care, and how statin use and statin intensity impact the health outcomes of people living with dementia and stroke.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540808/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的这项基于澳大利亚人口的研究调查了有痴呆症和无痴呆症的匹配队列中因缺血性中风住院后他汀类药物的强度:我们从维多利亚州入院病例数据集中识别了 2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日期间在澳大利亚维多利亚州因缺血性中风住院的所有年龄≥30 岁的患者。患有痴呆症的患者与未患有痴呆症的患者在性别、5岁年龄组和发病日期±90天方面进行了1:4配对。从处方索赔数据中提取出出院后 60 天内他汀类药物的配药记录。确定了出院后首次发放他汀类药物的强度。使用多项式逻辑回归法估算了高强度与中低强度以及未配发他汀类药物的比值比,并对年龄、性别和合并症等因素进行了调整:队列由 11105 人组成(痴呆症患者:N = 2221;无痴呆症患者:N = 2221):N = 2221;无痴呆症:N = 8884,52%为女性。与非痴呆症患者相比,痴呆症患者接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的几率比接受中低等强度他汀类药物治疗的几率低35%(95%置信区间[CI]:24%-44%),接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的几率比不接受他汀类药物治疗的几率低54%(95%置信区间:48%-59%)。与男性相比,患有和未患有痴呆症的女性接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的几率比中低度他汀类药物治疗的几率低16%(95% CI:5%-25%),接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的几率比不接受他汀类药物治疗的几率低28%(95% CI:19%-35%):结论:与非痴呆症患者相比,痴呆症患者出院后接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的可能性较低。在接受指南推荐的高强度他汀类药物治疗以进行缺血性卒中二级预防方面存在性别差异:指南建议所有有合理预期寿命的患者在中风后接受高强度他汀类药物治疗,以降低中风复发和其他不良心血管事件的风险。需要开展更多研究,以了解痴呆患者为何可能得不到指南推荐的治疗,以及他汀类药物的使用和强度如何影响痴呆患者和中风患者的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are People Living With Dementia Receiving High Intensity Statin Therapy After Stroke? A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background and Aims

This Australian population-based study investigated statin intensity after hospitalization for ischemic stroke in a matched cohort of people living with and without dementia.

Methods

We identified all patients aged ≥ 30 years hospitalized in the state of Victoria, Australia, for ischemic stroke from July 1, 2013 to April 30, 2018 from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Data set. People with dementia were matched 1:4 for sex, 5-year age group and index date ± 90 days with people without dementia. Records of statin dispensing within 60 days postdischarge were extracted from prescription claims data. The intensity of the first postdischarge statin dispensing was determined. Odds ratios for high versus low-moderate intensity and no statin dispensing were estimated using multinomial logistic regression adjusted for factors including age, sex, and comorbidity.

Results

The cohorts comprised 11,105 people (dementia: N = 2221; without dementia: N = 8884 and 52% were female. Compared to people without dementia, people with dementia had 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%–44%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus a low-moderate intensity statin and 54% (95% CI: 48%–59%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin. Compared to men, women with and without dementia had 16% (95% CI: 5%–25%) lower odds of receiving a high- versus low-moderate intensity statin and 28% (95% CI: 19%–35%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin.

Conclusions

People living with dementia are less likely to receive high-intensity statins post-discharge compared to people without dementia. There is a gender gap in receipt of guideline-recommended high-intensity statin therapy for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke.

Clinical Implications

Guidelines recommend all people with reasonable life expectancy receive a high-intensity statin after stroke to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events. More research is needed to understand why people living with dementia might not receive guideline recommended care, and how statin use and statin intensity impact the health outcomes of people living with dementia and stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Associated Factors Among Persons With Disabilities in Ghana's Ashanti Region RE: Proteomic Exploration of Potential Blood Biomarkers in Haemophilic Arthropathy Challenges Associated With Re-Emergence of Lassa Fever in Nigeria: An Exploratory Study of Epidemiology, Phylogenomics, and Recommendations Toward Its Eradication Association Between Spinal Manipulation, Butalbital Prescription, and Medication Overuse Headache in Adults With Tension-Type Headache: Retrospective Cohort Study Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Pathogens in Patients With Esophageal Cancer From 2013 to 2022: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1