Errate：一项针对 290 例可切除良性和恶性胃肿瘤患者的回顾性研究，旨在比较使用弹簧圈夹（S-O 夹）和不使用内牵引法进行内镜下切除术的术后效果。

IF 3.1 4区医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.12659/MSM.947217

Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada

{"title":"Errate：一项针对 290 例可切除良性和恶性胃肿瘤患者的回顾性研究，旨在比较使用弹簧圈夹（S-O 夹）和不使用内牵引法进行内镜下切除术的术后效果。","authors":"Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada","doi":"10.12659/MSM.947217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors have identified an error in Table 5 concerning the dissection speed. It is currently listed as follows: S-O group 14.5±9.5 and Control group 25.1±18.9. However, this is incorrect. The correct values should be reversed: S-O group 25.1±18.9 and Control group 14.5±9.5.References:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip). Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e947217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Errate: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip).\",\"authors\":\"Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.947217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors have identified an error in Table 5 concerning the dissection speed. It is currently listed as follows: S-O group 14.5±9.5 and Control group 25.1±18.9. However, this is incorrect. The correct values should be reversed: S-O group 25.1±18.9 and Control group 14.5±9.5.References:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip). Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e947217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.947217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.947217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

作者在表 5 中发现了一处关于解剖速度的错误。目前表列如下S-O 组为 14.5±9.5，对照组为 25.1±18.9。然而，这是不正确的。正确的数值应为：S-O 组 25.1±18.9，对照组 14.5±9.5。参考文献：Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada：290 例可切除良性和恶性胃肿瘤患者的回顾性研究：比较使用弹簧圈夹（S-O 夹）和不使用内牵引法进行内镜下切除术的术后效果。Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341.DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Errate: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip).

The authors have identified an error in Table 5 concerning the dissection speed. It is currently listed as follows: S-O group 14.5±9.5 and Control group 25.1±18.9. However, this is incorrect. The correct values should be reversed: S-O group 25.1±18.9 and Control group 14.5±9.5.References:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip). Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

3.20%

发文量

514

审稿时长

3.0 months

期刊介绍： Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.