Fei Sun , Libing Xu , Jianmin Han , Hai Xu , Xinchang Li , Zeng Lin
{"title":"氧化锆牙科植入物的连接结构对生物力学特性的影响。","authors":"Fei Sun , Libing Xu , Jianmin Han , Hai Xu , Xinchang Li , Zeng Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The connection structure of zirconia dental implants significantly influences their biomechanical behavior and plays a crucial role in the overall service performance of the implant system. This study aims to compare the stress distribution of zirconia implants featuring various internal connection structures under different working conditions. Four distinct types of connection structures were designed for zirconia dental implants: triangular, quadrilateral, hexagonal, and hexalobular plus connections. Additionally, the finite element method was employed to analyze these structures under three working conditions: a static load test model, a bone level model, and a torsion model. Results indicated that in the static load test model, the hexagonal structure experienced the highest stress value at 1284.9 MPa due to its thin neck wall, whereas the hexalobular plus connected implant exhibited the lowest stress value at 1252.9 MPa. In the bone level model, the triangular connection structure demonstrated poor stress distribution for cortical bone and cancellous bone at 69.606 MPa and 7.8191 MPa, respectively. Conversely, the hexalobular plus connection yielded superior stress results for cortical bone and cancellous bone, with values of 66.24 MPa and 5.1327 MPa, respectively. In the torsion model, the hexalobular plus-connected implant exhibits the highest stress value at 237.6 MPa, while maintaining the smallest force transmission angle. Therefore, given that the abutment necessitates a greater range of installation angles and improved torque transmission, the hexalobular plus connection structure may represent the optimal choice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 106800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the connection structure of zirconia dental implants on biomechanical properties\",\"authors\":\"Fei Sun , Libing Xu , Jianmin Han , Hai Xu , Xinchang Li , Zeng Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The connection structure of zirconia dental implants significantly influences their biomechanical behavior and plays a crucial role in the overall service performance of the implant system. This study aims to compare the stress distribution of zirconia implants featuring various internal connection structures under different working conditions. Four distinct types of connection structures were designed for zirconia dental implants: triangular, quadrilateral, hexagonal, and hexalobular plus connections. Additionally, the finite element method was employed to analyze these structures under three working conditions: a static load test model, a bone level model, and a torsion model. Results indicated that in the static load test model, the hexagonal structure experienced the highest stress value at 1284.9 MPa due to its thin neck wall, whereas the hexalobular plus connected implant exhibited the lowest stress value at 1252.9 MPa. In the bone level model, the triangular connection structure demonstrated poor stress distribution for cortical bone and cancellous bone at 69.606 MPa and 7.8191 MPa, respectively. Conversely, the hexalobular plus connection yielded superior stress results for cortical bone and cancellous bone, with values of 66.24 MPa and 5.1327 MPa, respectively. In the torsion model, the hexalobular plus-connected implant exhibits the highest stress value at 237.6 MPa, while maintaining the smallest force transmission angle. Therefore, given that the abutment necessitates a greater range of installation angles and improved torque transmission, the hexalobular plus connection structure may represent the optimal choice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124004326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124004326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of the connection structure of zirconia dental implants on biomechanical properties
The connection structure of zirconia dental implants significantly influences their biomechanical behavior and plays a crucial role in the overall service performance of the implant system. This study aims to compare the stress distribution of zirconia implants featuring various internal connection structures under different working conditions. Four distinct types of connection structures were designed for zirconia dental implants: triangular, quadrilateral, hexagonal, and hexalobular plus connections. Additionally, the finite element method was employed to analyze these structures under three working conditions: a static load test model, a bone level model, and a torsion model. Results indicated that in the static load test model, the hexagonal structure experienced the highest stress value at 1284.9 MPa due to its thin neck wall, whereas the hexalobular plus connected implant exhibited the lowest stress value at 1252.9 MPa. In the bone level model, the triangular connection structure demonstrated poor stress distribution for cortical bone and cancellous bone at 69.606 MPa and 7.8191 MPa, respectively. Conversely, the hexalobular plus connection yielded superior stress results for cortical bone and cancellous bone, with values of 66.24 MPa and 5.1327 MPa, respectively. In the torsion model, the hexalobular plus-connected implant exhibits the highest stress value at 237.6 MPa, while maintaining the smallest force transmission angle. Therefore, given that the abutment necessitates a greater range of installation angles and improved torque transmission, the hexalobular plus connection structure may represent the optimal choice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.