美国人对远程医疗的看法:是否存在种族/族裔差异?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0471
Jennifer E Akpo, Samuel T Opoku, Bettye A Apenteng, William A Mase
{"title":"美国人对远程医疗的看法:是否存在种族/族裔差异?","authors":"Jennifer E Akpo, Samuel T Opoku, Bettye A Apenteng, William A Mase","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Telehealth, a beneficial and safe option for in-person medical patient visits, has the potential to significantly improve patient health outcomes. While its use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is limited research on the perception of telehealth compared with in-person care among different racial and ethnic groups in the United States. We aimed to investigate the relationship between race/ethnicity and the perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care. <b>Methods</b>: The study used the Health Information Nation Trends Survey Cycle 6, a nationally representative survey conducted between March and November 2022, as its primary data source. The analytic sample included 2,384 participants of age 18 years and older. The primary outcome, perceived telehealth equivalency, was measured as the self-reported perception that telehealth is equivalent to in-person care. Logistic regression examined the association between race/ethnicity and perceived telehealth equivalency, adjusting for several potential confounding factors. <b>Results</b>: The findings indicated that being non-Hispanic Black or African American, relative to non-Hispanic White, was significantly associated with the perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-3.57, <i>p</i> = 0.016). High school graduates (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.02-3.25, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and those insured (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.29-6.91, <i>p </i>= 0.01) were significantly more likely to report a perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care. The different modalities, such as video or audio, were not significantly associated with perceived telehealth equivalency. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that understanding demographic and contextual factors may help enhance telehealth acceptance and utilization and inform efforts to increase equitable access to health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Telehealth in the United States: Are There Racial/Ethnic Differences?\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer E Akpo, Samuel T Opoku, Bettye A Apenteng, William A Mase\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2024.0471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Telehealth, a beneficial and safe option for in-person medical patient visits, has the potential to significantly improve patient health outcomes. While its use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is limited research on the perception of telehealth compared with in-person care among different racial and ethnic groups in the United States. We aimed to investigate the relationship between race/ethnicity and the perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care. <b>Methods</b>: The study used the Health Information Nation Trends Survey Cycle 6, a nationally representative survey conducted between March and November 2022, as its primary data source. The analytic sample included 2,384 participants of age 18 years and older. The primary outcome, perceived telehealth equivalency, was measured as the self-reported perception that telehealth is equivalent to in-person care. Logistic regression examined the association between race/ethnicity and perceived telehealth equivalency, adjusting for several potential confounding factors. <b>Results</b>: The findings indicated that being non-Hispanic Black or African American, relative to non-Hispanic White, was significantly associated with the perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-3.57, <i>p</i> = 0.016). High school graduates (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.02-3.25, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and those insured (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.29-6.91, <i>p </i>= 0.01) were significantly more likely to report a perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care. The different modalities, such as video or audio, were not significantly associated with perceived telehealth equivalency. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that understanding demographic and contextual factors may help enhance telehealth acceptance and utilization and inform efforts to increase equitable access to health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0471\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言远程医疗是患者亲自就诊的一种既有益又安全的选择,有可能显著改善患者的健康状况。虽然在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗的使用有所增加,但有关美国不同种族和民族群体对远程医疗与亲诊相比的看法的研究却很有限。我们的目的是调查种族/民族与远程医疗与面对面医疗相似的看法之间的关系。研究方法本研究以 2022 年 3 月至 11 月期间进行的具有全国代表性的 "健康信息国家趋势调查第 6 周期 "为主要数据来源。分析样本包括 2384 名 18 岁及以上的参与者。主要结果 "远程医疗等效感知 "以自我报告的 "远程医疗等同于面对面医疗 "的感知来衡量。逻辑回归检验了种族/民族与感知的远程保健等效性之间的关联,并对几个潜在的干扰因素进行了调整。结果:研究结果表明,相对于非西班牙裔白人而言,非西班牙裔黑人或非裔美国人与认为远程医疗与亲身医疗类似的看法有显著关联(几率比 [OR] = 2.02,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.14-3.57,p = 0.016)。高中毕业生(OR = 1.82,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.02-3.25,p = 0.04)和有保险者(OR = 2.98,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.29-6.91,p = 0.01)更有可能认为远程医疗与面对面医疗类似。不同的模式,如视频或音频,与远程医疗的等同感并无明显关联。结论:这些研究结果表明,了解人口和环境因素可能有助于提高远程医疗的接受度和利用率,并为提高医疗服务的公平性提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of Telehealth in the United States: Are There Racial/Ethnic Differences?

Introduction: Telehealth, a beneficial and safe option for in-person medical patient visits, has the potential to significantly improve patient health outcomes. While its use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is limited research on the perception of telehealth compared with in-person care among different racial and ethnic groups in the United States. We aimed to investigate the relationship between race/ethnicity and the perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care. Methods: The study used the Health Information Nation Trends Survey Cycle 6, a nationally representative survey conducted between March and November 2022, as its primary data source. The analytic sample included 2,384 participants of age 18 years and older. The primary outcome, perceived telehealth equivalency, was measured as the self-reported perception that telehealth is equivalent to in-person care. Logistic regression examined the association between race/ethnicity and perceived telehealth equivalency, adjusting for several potential confounding factors. Results: The findings indicated that being non-Hispanic Black or African American, relative to non-Hispanic White, was significantly associated with the perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-3.57, p = 0.016). High school graduates (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.02-3.25, p = 0.04) and those insured (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.29-6.91, p = 0.01) were significantly more likely to report a perception that telehealth is similar to in-person care. The different modalities, such as video or audio, were not significantly associated with perceived telehealth equivalency. Conclusions: These findings suggest that understanding demographic and contextual factors may help enhance telehealth acceptance and utilization and inform efforts to increase equitable access to health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Telehealth in the United States: Are There Racial/Ethnic Differences? Disparities in Telehealth Offer and Use among U.S. Adults: 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth Services in Primary Care. Examination of Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Experience During COVID-19 in MNGHA, Saudi Arabia. Practical Experience with the Use of Electronic Headache Diaries and Video Consultations in Migraine Care from a Longitudinal Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1