Ellen Hein Nordvig, Gull-Mai Bergliot Grønbæk, Zahra Khalid Al-Uboody, Jakob Lykke, Jakob Hagen Vasehus Schou, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌患者在诱导化疗和化疗放疗或单独化疗放疗后进行 R1 切除术的长期疗效。","authors":"Ellen Hein Nordvig, Gull-Mai Bergliot Grønbæk, Zahra Khalid Al-Uboody, Jakob Lykke, Jakob Hagen Vasehus Schou, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, long-term outcomes have not been investigated for patients with incomplete (R1) resection separately. This study investigates overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with R1 resection after preoperative treatment with ICT and CRT or CRT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the NORD database 689 patients with LARC who received treatment between 2006 and 2017 were screened for inclusion. All patients with R1 resection were included. ICT consisted of at least 1 cycle of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and was followed by radiotherapy concomitant with capecitabine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 46 patients with R1 resection, 27 (59%) received both ICT and CRT, and 19 (41%) patients received CRT. The 5-year OS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 37% (95% CI, 15%-59%) (CRT) (P = .25) and 5-year DFS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 32% (95% CI, 11%-53%) (CRT) (P = .22). The local recurrence rates showed a small nonstatistical significant difference in local control in the ICT group: 15% compared to 26% in the CRT group (P = .22). Distant recurrence rates were similar: 41% (ICT + CRT) versus 47% (CRT) (P = .48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in OS, DFS or local and distant recurrence rates between patients who received ICT + CRT versus patients who received CRT only.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following R1 Resection After Either Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Hein Nordvig, Gull-Mai Bergliot Grønbæk, Zahra Khalid Al-Uboody, Jakob Lykke, Jakob Hagen Vasehus Schou, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, long-term outcomes have not been investigated for patients with incomplete (R1) resection separately. This study investigates overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with R1 resection after preoperative treatment with ICT and CRT or CRT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the NORD database 689 patients with LARC who received treatment between 2006 and 2017 were screened for inclusion. All patients with R1 resection were included. ICT consisted of at least 1 cycle of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and was followed by radiotherapy concomitant with capecitabine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 46 patients with R1 resection, 27 (59%) received both ICT and CRT, and 19 (41%) patients received CRT. The 5-year OS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 37% (95% CI, 15%-59%) (CRT) (P = .25) and 5-year DFS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 32% (95% CI, 11%-53%) (CRT) (P = .22). The local recurrence rates showed a small nonstatistical significant difference in local control in the ICT group: 15% compared to 26% in the CRT group (P = .22). Distant recurrence rates were similar: 41% (ICT + CRT) versus 47% (CRT) (P = .48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in OS, DFS or local and distant recurrence rates between patients who received ICT + CRT versus patients who received CRT only.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following R1 Resection After Either Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy Alone.
Introduction: Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, long-term outcomes have not been investigated for patients with incomplete (R1) resection separately. This study investigates overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with R1 resection after preoperative treatment with ICT and CRT or CRT.
Patients and methods: From the NORD database 689 patients with LARC who received treatment between 2006 and 2017 were screened for inclusion. All patients with R1 resection were included. ICT consisted of at least 1 cycle of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and was followed by radiotherapy concomitant with capecitabine.
Results: Among 46 patients with R1 resection, 27 (59%) received both ICT and CRT, and 19 (41%) patients received CRT. The 5-year OS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 37% (95% CI, 15%-59%) (CRT) (P = .25) and 5-year DFS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 32% (95% CI, 11%-53%) (CRT) (P = .22). The local recurrence rates showed a small nonstatistical significant difference in local control in the ICT group: 15% compared to 26% in the CRT group (P = .22). Distant recurrence rates were similar: 41% (ICT + CRT) versus 47% (CRT) (P = .48).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in OS, DFS or local and distant recurrence rates between patients who received ICT + CRT versus patients who received CRT only.