局部晚期直肠癌患者在诱导化疗和化疗放疗或单独化疗放疗后进行 R1 切除术的长期疗效。

Ellen Hein Nordvig, Gull-Mai Bergliot Grønbæk, Zahra Khalid Al-Uboody, Jakob Lykke, Jakob Hagen Vasehus Schou, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌患者在诱导化疗和化疗放疗或单独化疗放疗后进行 R1 切除术的长期疗效。","authors":"Ellen Hein Nordvig, Gull-Mai Bergliot Grønbæk, Zahra Khalid Al-Uboody, Jakob Lykke, Jakob Hagen Vasehus Schou, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, long-term outcomes have not been investigated for patients with incomplete (R1) resection separately. This study investigates overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with R1 resection after preoperative treatment with ICT and CRT or CRT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the NORD database 689 patients with LARC who received treatment between 2006 and 2017 were screened for inclusion. All patients with R1 resection were included. ICT consisted of at least 1 cycle of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and was followed by radiotherapy concomitant with capecitabine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 46 patients with R1 resection, 27 (59%) received both ICT and CRT, and 19 (41%) patients received CRT. The 5-year OS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 37% (95% CI, 15%-59%) (CRT) (P = .25) and 5-year DFS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 32% (95% CI, 11%-53%) (CRT) (P = .22). The local recurrence rates showed a small nonstatistical significant difference in local control in the ICT group: 15% compared to 26% in the CRT group (P = .22). Distant recurrence rates were similar: 41% (ICT + CRT) versus 47% (CRT) (P = .48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in OS, DFS or local and distant recurrence rates between patients who received ICT + CRT versus patients who received CRT only.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following R1 Resection After Either Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Hein Nordvig, Gull-Mai Bergliot Grønbæk, Zahra Khalid Al-Uboody, Jakob Lykke, Jakob Hagen Vasehus Schou, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, long-term outcomes have not been investigated for patients with incomplete (R1) resection separately. This study investigates overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with R1 resection after preoperative treatment with ICT and CRT or CRT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the NORD database 689 patients with LARC who received treatment between 2006 and 2017 were screened for inclusion. All patients with R1 resection were included. ICT consisted of at least 1 cycle of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and was followed by radiotherapy concomitant with capecitabine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 46 patients with R1 resection, 27 (59%) received both ICT and CRT, and 19 (41%) patients received CRT. The 5-year OS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 37% (95% CI, 15%-59%) (CRT) (P = .25) and 5-year DFS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 32% (95% CI, 11%-53%) (CRT) (P = .22). The local recurrence rates showed a small nonstatistical significant difference in local control in the ICT group: 15% compared to 26% in the CRT group (P = .22). Distant recurrence rates were similar: 41% (ICT + CRT) versus 47% (CRT) (P = .48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in OS, DFS or local and distant recurrence rates between patients who received ICT + CRT versus patients who received CRT only.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:采用诱导化疗(ICT)和化放疗(CRT)的全新辅助治疗(TNT)改善了局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者的长期疗效。然而,尚未对不完全(R1)切除患者的长期疗效进行单独研究。本研究调查了R1切除患者术前接受ICT和CRT或CRT治疗后的总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)以及局部和远处复发率:从NORD数据库中筛选出689名在2006年至2017年间接受治疗的LARC患者。所有R1切除的患者均纳入其中。ICT包括至少一个周期的卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(CAPOX),之后在使用卡培他滨的同时进行放疗:在46例R1切除术患者中,27例(59%)同时接受了ICT和CRT治疗,19例(41%)接受了CRT治疗。5年OS为44%(95% CI,26%-63%)(ICT + CRT)对37%(95% CI,15%-59%)(CRT)(P = .25),5年DFS为44%(95% CI,26%-63%)(ICT + CRT)对32%(95% CI,11%-53%)(CRT)(P = .22)。局部复发率显示,ICT 组在局部控制方面存在微小的非统计学显著差异:15% 而 CRT 组为 26% (P = .22)。远处复发率相似:41%(ICT + CRT)对47%(CRT)(P = .48):结论:接受ICT + CRT治疗的患者与仅接受CRT治疗的患者在OS、DFS或局部和远处复发率方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following R1 Resection After Either Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy Alone.

Introduction: Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, long-term outcomes have not been investigated for patients with incomplete (R1) resection separately. This study investigates overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with R1 resection after preoperative treatment with ICT and CRT or CRT.

Patients and methods: From the NORD database 689 patients with LARC who received treatment between 2006 and 2017 were screened for inclusion. All patients with R1 resection were included. ICT consisted of at least 1 cycle of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and was followed by radiotherapy concomitant with capecitabine.

Results: Among 46 patients with R1 resection, 27 (59%) received both ICT and CRT, and 19 (41%) patients received CRT. The 5-year OS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 37% (95% CI, 15%-59%) (CRT) (P = .25) and 5-year DFS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 32% (95% CI, 11%-53%) (CRT) (P = .22). The local recurrence rates showed a small nonstatistical significant difference in local control in the ICT group: 15% compared to 26% in the CRT group (P = .22). Distant recurrence rates were similar: 41% (ICT + CRT) versus 47% (CRT) (P = .48).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in OS, DFS or local and distant recurrence rates between patients who received ICT + CRT versus patients who received CRT only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MDTB) in the Management of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Aflibercept-Based and Bevacizumab-Based Second Line Regimens in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score Weighted-Analysis from a Multicenter Cohort. Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Significantly Enhances Disease-Free Survival in Stage II-III Rectal Cancer. SATB2 Expression Affects Chemotherapy Metabolism and Immune Checkpoint Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer. Organ Preservation After Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1