住院儿科癌症患者的症状筛查

IF 8.2 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL ACS Sensors Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4727
L. Lee Dupuis, Donna L. Johnston, David Dix, Sarah McKillop, Sadie Cook, Nicole Crellin-Parsons, Ketan Kulkarni, Serina Patel, Magimairajan lssai Vanan, Paul Gibson, Dilip Soman, Susan Kuczynski, George A. Tomlinson, Lillian Sung
{"title":"住院儿科癌症患者的症状筛查","authors":"L. Lee Dupuis, Donna L. Johnston, David Dix, Sarah McKillop, Sadie Cook, Nicole Crellin-Parsons, Ketan Kulkarni, Serina Patel, Magimairajan lssai Vanan, Paul Gibson, Dilip Soman, Susan Kuczynski, George A. Tomlinson, Lillian Sung","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportancePediatric patients with cancer experience severely bothersome symptoms during treatment. It was hypothesized that symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team would reduce symptom burden in pediatric patients with cancer.ObjectiveTo determine if daily symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team was associated with lower total symptom burden as measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) compared to usual care among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial enrolled participants from July 2018 to September 2023 from 8 Canadian tertiary care centers that diagnose and treat pediatric patients with cancer. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with cancer expected to be in a hospital or clinic daily for at least 5 consecutive days were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 176) vs control (n = 169) groups. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2023.InterventionIntervention participants completed the SSPedi once daily for 5 days. Printed symptom reports were provided daily to the health care team, and email alerts were distributed for severely bothersome symptoms. Control participants received usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score on day 5. Secondary outcomes were individual SSPedi symptoms, pain, quality of life, symptom documentation, and intervention provision. The primary analysis compared the day 5 total SSPedi scores between randomized groups using a multiple linear regression model. For the secondary analysis comparing individual SSPedi symptom scores, the odds ratio for the intervention was estimated using a proportional odds model. Pain and quality of life were analyzed using the same approach as the primary outcome. Fisher exact test was used to compare symptom documentation, any intervention, and symptom-specific intervention between groups.ResultsA total of 345 participants were enrolled; median (range) participant age was 13.8 (8.0-18.8) years, and 150 participants (43.5%) were female. Day 5 SSPedi score was significantly better with symptom screening compared to usual care (adjusted mean difference, −2.5; 95% CI, −3.8 to −1.2). Symptom screening reduced the odds of higher individual symptom scores; 8 of 15 symptom reductions were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in pain or quality of life scores between groups. Five symptoms were documented or treated significantly more often with symptom screening than usual care.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days, symptom screening with SSPedi improved total symptom scores compared to usual care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03593525\">NCT03593525</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":24,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sensors","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptom Screening for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Cancer\",\"authors\":\"L. Lee Dupuis, Donna L. Johnston, David Dix, Sarah McKillop, Sadie Cook, Nicole Crellin-Parsons, Ketan Kulkarni, Serina Patel, Magimairajan lssai Vanan, Paul Gibson, Dilip Soman, Susan Kuczynski, George A. Tomlinson, Lillian Sung\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportancePediatric patients with cancer experience severely bothersome symptoms during treatment. It was hypothesized that symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team would reduce symptom burden in pediatric patients with cancer.ObjectiveTo determine if daily symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team was associated with lower total symptom burden as measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) compared to usual care among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial enrolled participants from July 2018 to September 2023 from 8 Canadian tertiary care centers that diagnose and treat pediatric patients with cancer. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with cancer expected to be in a hospital or clinic daily for at least 5 consecutive days were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 176) vs control (n = 169) groups. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2023.InterventionIntervention participants completed the SSPedi once daily for 5 days. Printed symptom reports were provided daily to the health care team, and email alerts were distributed for severely bothersome symptoms. Control participants received usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score on day 5. Secondary outcomes were individual SSPedi symptoms, pain, quality of life, symptom documentation, and intervention provision. The primary analysis compared the day 5 total SSPedi scores between randomized groups using a multiple linear regression model. For the secondary analysis comparing individual SSPedi symptom scores, the odds ratio for the intervention was estimated using a proportional odds model. Pain and quality of life were analyzed using the same approach as the primary outcome. Fisher exact test was used to compare symptom documentation, any intervention, and symptom-specific intervention between groups.ResultsA total of 345 participants were enrolled; median (range) participant age was 13.8 (8.0-18.8) years, and 150 participants (43.5%) were female. Day 5 SSPedi score was significantly better with symptom screening compared to usual care (adjusted mean difference, −2.5; 95% CI, −3.8 to −1.2). Symptom screening reduced the odds of higher individual symptom scores; 8 of 15 symptom reductions were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in pain or quality of life scores between groups. Five symptoms were documented or treated significantly more often with symptom screening than usual care.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days, symptom screening with SSPedi improved total symptom scores compared to usual care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\" ext-link-type=\\\"uri\\\" xlink:href=\\\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03593525\\\">NCT03593525</jats:ext-link>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Sensors\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4727\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性儿童癌症患者在治疗期间会出现严重的症状。研究假设,症状筛查并向医护团队提供症状报告将减轻儿科癌症患者的症状负担。目标确定与常规护理相比,在入院或每天在诊所就诊至少5天的儿科癌症患者中,每日进行症状筛查并向医护团队提供症状报告是否与儿科症状筛查工具(SSPedi)测量的总症状负担降低相关。设计、设置和参与者这项随机临床试验于2018年7月至2023年9月在加拿大8家诊断和治疗儿科癌症患者的三级医疗中心招募参与者。年龄在 8 到 18 岁之间、预计每天至少连续住院或门诊 5 天的癌症患者均符合纳入条件。参与者被随机分为干预组(n = 176)和对照组(n = 169)。数据分析时间为 2023 年 11 月至 2023 年 12 月。干预干预参与者在 5 天内每天完成一次 SSPedi。每天向医护团队提供打印的症状报告,并对严重困扰的症状发出电子邮件提醒。主要结果和测量指标主要结果是第 5 天自我报告的 SSPedi 总分。次要结果为个体 SSPedi 症状、疼痛、生活质量、症状记录和干预措施提供情况。主要分析采用多元线性回归模型比较随机分组之间的第 5 天 SSPedi 总分。在比较单个 SSPedi 症状得分的次要分析中,使用比例几率模型估算干预的几率比例。疼痛和生活质量的分析方法与主要结果相同。费舍尔精确检验用于比较各组之间的症状记录、任何干预措施和针对特定症状的干预措施。与常规护理相比,症状筛查的第5天SSPedi得分明显更高(调整后的平均差异为-2.5;95% CI为-3.8至-1.2)。症状筛查降低了单个症状得分较高的几率;15 个症状中有 8 个症状的降低具有统计学意义。组间疼痛或生活质量评分无明显差异。结论和相关性在这项随机临床试验中,与常规治疗相比,在入院或每天在诊所就诊至少 5 天的儿科癌症患者中,使用 SSPedi 进行症状筛查可改善症状总分:NCT03593525
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Symptom Screening for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Cancer
ImportancePediatric patients with cancer experience severely bothersome symptoms during treatment. It was hypothesized that symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team would reduce symptom burden in pediatric patients with cancer.ObjectiveTo determine if daily symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team was associated with lower total symptom burden as measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) compared to usual care among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial enrolled participants from July 2018 to September 2023 from 8 Canadian tertiary care centers that diagnose and treat pediatric patients with cancer. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with cancer expected to be in a hospital or clinic daily for at least 5 consecutive days were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 176) vs control (n = 169) groups. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2023.InterventionIntervention participants completed the SSPedi once daily for 5 days. Printed symptom reports were provided daily to the health care team, and email alerts were distributed for severely bothersome symptoms. Control participants received usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score on day 5. Secondary outcomes were individual SSPedi symptoms, pain, quality of life, symptom documentation, and intervention provision. The primary analysis compared the day 5 total SSPedi scores between randomized groups using a multiple linear regression model. For the secondary analysis comparing individual SSPedi symptom scores, the odds ratio for the intervention was estimated using a proportional odds model. Pain and quality of life were analyzed using the same approach as the primary outcome. Fisher exact test was used to compare symptom documentation, any intervention, and symptom-specific intervention between groups.ResultsA total of 345 participants were enrolled; median (range) participant age was 13.8 (8.0-18.8) years, and 150 participants (43.5%) were female. Day 5 SSPedi score was significantly better with symptom screening compared to usual care (adjusted mean difference, −2.5; 95% CI, −3.8 to −1.2). Symptom screening reduced the odds of higher individual symptom scores; 8 of 15 symptom reductions were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in pain or quality of life scores between groups. Five symptoms were documented or treated significantly more often with symptom screening than usual care.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days, symptom screening with SSPedi improved total symptom scores compared to usual care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03593525
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Sensors
ACS Sensors Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
372
期刊介绍: ACS Sensors is a peer-reviewed research journal that focuses on the dissemination of new and original knowledge in the field of sensor science, particularly those that selectively sense chemical or biological species or processes. The journal covers a broad range of topics, including but not limited to biosensors, chemical sensors, gas sensors, intracellular sensors, single molecule sensors, cell chips, and microfluidic devices. It aims to publish articles that address conceptual advances in sensing technology applicable to various types of analytes or application papers that report on the use of existing sensing concepts in new ways or for new analytes.
期刊最新文献
Target-Induced On-Protein Clustering of Metal Peptide Enables Low Overpotential Water Splitting for Early Detection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Self-Interference Digital Optofluidic Genotyping for Integrated and Automated Label-Free Pathogen Detection SABRE-SHEATH Hyperpolarization of [1,5-13C2]Z-OMPD for Noninvasive pH Sensing. The Cross-Sensitivity of Chemiresistive Gas Sensors: Nature, Methods, and Peculiarities: A Systematic Review. Magnetism-Functionalized Lanthanide MOF-on-MOF with Plasmonic Differential Signal Amplification for Ultrasensitive Fluorescence Immunoassays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1