Sebastian Höhna, Sarah E Lower, Pablo Duchen, Ana Catalán
{"title":"尽管存在基因树估计误差,但分化时间估计的稳健性:萤火虫(鞘翅目:灯蛾科)案例研究","authors":"Sebastian Höhna, Sarah E Lower, Pablo Duchen, Ana Catalán","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syae065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genomic data has become ubiquitous in phylogenomic studies, including divergence time estimation, but provide new challenges. These challenges include, amongst others, biological gene tree discordance, methodological gene tree estimation error, and computational limitations on performing full Bayesian inference under complex models. In this study, we use a recently published firefly (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) anchored hybrid enrichment dataset (AHE; 436 loci for 88 Lampyridae species and 10 outgroup species) as a case study to explore gene tree estimation error and the robustness of divergence time estimation. First, we explored the amount of model violation using posterior predictive simulations because model violations are likely to bias phylogenetic inferences and produce gene tree estimation error. We specifically focused on missing data (either uniformly distributed or systematically) and the distribution of highly variable and conserved sites (either uniformly distributed or clustered). Our assessment of model adequacy showed that standard phylogenetic substitution models are not adequate for any of the 436 AHE loci. We tested if the model violations and alignment errors resulted indeed in gene tree estimation error by comparing the observed gene tree discordance to simulated gene tree discordance under the multispecies coalescent model. Thus, we show that the inferred gene tree discordance is not only due to biological mechanism but primarily due to inference errors. Lastly, we explored if divergence time estimation is robust despite the observed gene tree estimation error. We selected four subsets of the full AHE dataset, concatenated each subset and performed a Bayesian relaxed clock divergence estimation in RevBayes. The estimated divergence times overlapped for all nodes that are shared between the topologies. Thus, divergence time estimation is robust using any well selected data subset as long as the topology inference is robust.","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness of Divergence Time Estimation Despite Gene Tree Estimation Error: A Case Study of Fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Höhna, Sarah E Lower, Pablo Duchen, Ana Catalán\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sysbio/syae065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Genomic data has become ubiquitous in phylogenomic studies, including divergence time estimation, but provide new challenges. These challenges include, amongst others, biological gene tree discordance, methodological gene tree estimation error, and computational limitations on performing full Bayesian inference under complex models. In this study, we use a recently published firefly (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) anchored hybrid enrichment dataset (AHE; 436 loci for 88 Lampyridae species and 10 outgroup species) as a case study to explore gene tree estimation error and the robustness of divergence time estimation. First, we explored the amount of model violation using posterior predictive simulations because model violations are likely to bias phylogenetic inferences and produce gene tree estimation error. We specifically focused on missing data (either uniformly distributed or systematically) and the distribution of highly variable and conserved sites (either uniformly distributed or clustered). Our assessment of model adequacy showed that standard phylogenetic substitution models are not adequate for any of the 436 AHE loci. We tested if the model violations and alignment errors resulted indeed in gene tree estimation error by comparing the observed gene tree discordance to simulated gene tree discordance under the multispecies coalescent model. Thus, we show that the inferred gene tree discordance is not only due to biological mechanism but primarily due to inference errors. Lastly, we explored if divergence time estimation is robust despite the observed gene tree estimation error. We selected four subsets of the full AHE dataset, concatenated each subset and performed a Bayesian relaxed clock divergence estimation in RevBayes. The estimated divergence times overlapped for all nodes that are shared between the topologies. Thus, divergence time estimation is robust using any well selected data subset as long as the topology inference is robust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae065\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robustness of Divergence Time Estimation Despite Gene Tree Estimation Error: A Case Study of Fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)
Genomic data has become ubiquitous in phylogenomic studies, including divergence time estimation, but provide new challenges. These challenges include, amongst others, biological gene tree discordance, methodological gene tree estimation error, and computational limitations on performing full Bayesian inference under complex models. In this study, we use a recently published firefly (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) anchored hybrid enrichment dataset (AHE; 436 loci for 88 Lampyridae species and 10 outgroup species) as a case study to explore gene tree estimation error and the robustness of divergence time estimation. First, we explored the amount of model violation using posterior predictive simulations because model violations are likely to bias phylogenetic inferences and produce gene tree estimation error. We specifically focused on missing data (either uniformly distributed or systematically) and the distribution of highly variable and conserved sites (either uniformly distributed or clustered). Our assessment of model adequacy showed that standard phylogenetic substitution models are not adequate for any of the 436 AHE loci. We tested if the model violations and alignment errors resulted indeed in gene tree estimation error by comparing the observed gene tree discordance to simulated gene tree discordance under the multispecies coalescent model. Thus, we show that the inferred gene tree discordance is not only due to biological mechanism but primarily due to inference errors. Lastly, we explored if divergence time estimation is robust despite the observed gene tree estimation error. We selected four subsets of the full AHE dataset, concatenated each subset and performed a Bayesian relaxed clock divergence estimation in RevBayes. The estimated divergence times overlapped for all nodes that are shared between the topologies. Thus, divergence time estimation is robust using any well selected data subset as long as the topology inference is robust.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.