基于 3D 射线跟踪技术的 INTOMO 运算器,用于 GNSS 多源层析成像

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01915-5
Adam Cegla, Gregor Moeller, Pawel Hordyniec, Witold Rohm
{"title":"基于 3D 射线跟踪技术的 INTOMO 运算器,用于 GNSS 多源层析成像","authors":"Adam Cegla, Gregor Moeller, Pawel Hordyniec, Witold Rohm","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01915-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current GNSS meteorology literature focuses on ground-based and space-based GNSS observations separately, without exploring potential synergies. In this study, we propose combining the two data sources using GNSS tomography to overcome current limitations in (1) horizontal resolution of GNSS space-based, (2) low vertical resolution of GNSS ground-based tropospheric retrievals when the number of GNSS ground-based observations is limited and (3) instability of the tomography system due to a lack of observations traversing the atmosphere horizontally. Our study on the combination of GNSS ground-based and space-based presents an innovative way for data integration based on uncertainty estimation. The developed integrated tomography operator, based on 3D ray tracing principles, is tested on 30 days of simulated data with 101 ground stations and over 240 radio occultation events, using three different station layouts. The a priori data introduced into the tomography processing is from a deterministic model, while ray tracing uses the ERA5 reanalysis wet refractivity field to obtain input data for individual test cases. The results are verified by comparing tomography output to ERA5 reanalysis. We observed a decrease in tomography RMSE between 2% and 16% in the case of an integrated solution, depending on GNSS station layout and the number and geometry of radio occultation ray paths. We show that a single RO event during one processing epoch can shift the wet refractivity estimates by 2 to 5 ppm closer to the correct solution compared to ground-based-only GNSS tomography.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"245 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTOMO operator for GNSS multi-source tomography based on 3D ray tracing technique\",\"authors\":\"Adam Cegla, Gregor Moeller, Pawel Hordyniec, Witold Rohm\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-024-01915-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current GNSS meteorology literature focuses on ground-based and space-based GNSS observations separately, without exploring potential synergies. In this study, we propose combining the two data sources using GNSS tomography to overcome current limitations in (1) horizontal resolution of GNSS space-based, (2) low vertical resolution of GNSS ground-based tropospheric retrievals when the number of GNSS ground-based observations is limited and (3) instability of the tomography system due to a lack of observations traversing the atmosphere horizontally. Our study on the combination of GNSS ground-based and space-based presents an innovative way for data integration based on uncertainty estimation. The developed integrated tomography operator, based on 3D ray tracing principles, is tested on 30 days of simulated data with 101 ground stations and over 240 radio occultation events, using three different station layouts. The a priori data introduced into the tomography processing is from a deterministic model, while ray tracing uses the ERA5 reanalysis wet refractivity field to obtain input data for individual test cases. The results are verified by comparing tomography output to ERA5 reanalysis. We observed a decrease in tomography RMSE between 2% and 16% in the case of an integrated solution, depending on GNSS station layout and the number and geometry of radio occultation ray paths. We show that a single RO event during one processing epoch can shift the wet refractivity estimates by 2 to 5 ppm closer to the correct solution compared to ground-based-only GNSS tomography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"245 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01915-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01915-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的全球导航卫星系统气象学文献侧重于分别进行地基和天基全球导航卫星系统观测,而没有探讨潜在的协同作用。在本研究中,我们建议利用全球导航卫星系统层析技术将这两种数据源结合起来,以克服目前在以下方面的局限性:(1)全球导航卫星系统天基的水平分辨率;(2)当全球导航卫星系统地基观测数据数量有限时,全球导航卫星系统地基对流层检索的垂直分辨率较低;(3)由于缺乏横穿大气层的观测数据,层析系统不稳定。我们对全球导航卫星系统地基和天基相结合的研究提出了一种基于不确定性估计的创新数据整合方法。根据三维射线追踪原理开发的综合层析成像算子在 30 天的模拟数据中进行了测试,这些数据包括 101 个地面站和 240 多个无线电掩星事件,使用了三种不同的站点布局。引入层析成像处理的先验数据来自一个确定性模型,而射线追踪则使用ERA5再分析湿折射率场来获取单个测试用例的输入数据。通过将层析成像输出结果与ERA5再分析结果进行比较,对结果进行了验证。我们观察到,根据全球导航卫星系统台站布局以及无线电掩星射线路径的数量和几何形状,在采用综合解决方案的情况下,层析 RMSE 降低了 2% 到 16%。我们表明,与仅基于地面的全球导航卫星系统层析成像相比,在一个处理历元期间发生的单个射电掩星事件可使湿折射率估计值偏移 2 到 5 ppm,更接近正确的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INTOMO operator for GNSS multi-source tomography based on 3D ray tracing technique

The current GNSS meteorology literature focuses on ground-based and space-based GNSS observations separately, without exploring potential synergies. In this study, we propose combining the two data sources using GNSS tomography to overcome current limitations in (1) horizontal resolution of GNSS space-based, (2) low vertical resolution of GNSS ground-based tropospheric retrievals when the number of GNSS ground-based observations is limited and (3) instability of the tomography system due to a lack of observations traversing the atmosphere horizontally. Our study on the combination of GNSS ground-based and space-based presents an innovative way for data integration based on uncertainty estimation. The developed integrated tomography operator, based on 3D ray tracing principles, is tested on 30 days of simulated data with 101 ground stations and over 240 radio occultation events, using three different station layouts. The a priori data introduced into the tomography processing is from a deterministic model, while ray tracing uses the ERA5 reanalysis wet refractivity field to obtain input data for individual test cases. The results are verified by comparing tomography output to ERA5 reanalysis. We observed a decrease in tomography RMSE between 2% and 16% in the case of an integrated solution, depending on GNSS station layout and the number and geometry of radio occultation ray paths. We show that a single RO event during one processing epoch can shift the wet refractivity estimates by 2 to 5 ppm closer to the correct solution compared to ground-based-only GNSS tomography.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Modified Bayesian method for simultaneously imaging fault geometry and slip distribution with reduced uncertainty, applied to 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging Spherical radial basis functions model: approximating an integral functional of an isotropic Gaussian random field Capture of coseismic velocity waveform using GNSS raw Doppler and carrier phase data for enhancing shaking intensity estimation Derivation of the Sagnac (Earth-rotation) correction and analysis of its accuracy for GNSS applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1