通过生物质气化生产蓝色氢气的可持续性评估:热能、太阳能和风能的比较分析。

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Bioresource Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131798
Yousaf Ayub, Jianzhao Zhou, Tao Shi, Sara Toniolo, Jingzheng Ren
{"title":"通过生物质气化生产蓝色氢气的可持续性评估:热能、太阳能和风能的比较分析。","authors":"Yousaf Ayub, Jianzhao Zhou, Tao Shi, Sara Toniolo, Jingzheng Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated three blue hydrogen production processes - solar-grid powered, wind-powered, and thermal power grid (TPG) - considering the context of Hong Kong, SAR, China. A process sustainability analysis was performed based on energy, economic, and environmental (3E) factors. The energy efficiency analysis indicates that the TPG system is the most energy-efficient with 64% efficiency, followed by the wind power system at 63% and the hybrid solar-grid powered system at 60%. The economic analysis results indicate that the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCH) is 2.165 $/kg for the TPG system, 2.132 $/kg for the hybrid solar-grid powered system, and 2.060 $/kg for the wind power system. The environmental assessment suggests that wind powered are eco-friendly with a unit point total (µPt) of 1.11, compared to the solar-grid 1.50 µPt and TPG system's 1.70 µPt. Therefore, 3E analysis proposes wind powered process is more sustainable for blue H<sub>2</sub> production.</p>","PeriodicalId":258,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology","volume":" ","pages":"131798"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability assessment of blue hydrogen production through biomass gasification: A comparative analysis of thermal, solar, and wind energy sources.\",\"authors\":\"Yousaf Ayub, Jianzhao Zhou, Tao Shi, Sara Toniolo, Jingzheng Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated three blue hydrogen production processes - solar-grid powered, wind-powered, and thermal power grid (TPG) - considering the context of Hong Kong, SAR, China. A process sustainability analysis was performed based on energy, economic, and environmental (3E) factors. The energy efficiency analysis indicates that the TPG system is the most energy-efficient with 64% efficiency, followed by the wind power system at 63% and the hybrid solar-grid powered system at 60%. The economic analysis results indicate that the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCH) is 2.165 $/kg for the TPG system, 2.132 $/kg for the hybrid solar-grid powered system, and 2.060 $/kg for the wind power system. The environmental assessment suggests that wind powered are eco-friendly with a unit point total (µPt) of 1.11, compared to the solar-grid 1.50 µPt and TPG system's 1.70 µPt. Therefore, 3E analysis proposes wind powered process is more sustainable for blue H<sub>2</sub> production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioresource Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"131798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioresource Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131798\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131798","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以中国香港特别行政区为背景,评估了三种蓝色氢气生产工艺--太阳能电网、风能和热电网(TPG)。根据能源、经济和环境(3E)因素对工艺的可持续性进行了分析。能效分析表明,热电网系统的能效最高,达到 64%,其次是风力发电系统的 63%和太阳能-电网混合供电系统的 60%。经济分析结果表明,TPG 系统的氢气平准化成本(LCH)为 2.165 美元/千克,混合太阳能-电网供电系统为 2.132 美元/千克,风力发电系统为 2.060 美元/千克。环境评估表明,风力发电系统的单位总点 (µPt) 为 1.11,比太阳能电网系统的 1.50 µPt 和 TPG 系统的 1.70 µPt 更为环保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability assessment of blue hydrogen production through biomass gasification: A comparative analysis of thermal, solar, and wind energy sources.

This study evaluated three blue hydrogen production processes - solar-grid powered, wind-powered, and thermal power grid (TPG) - considering the context of Hong Kong, SAR, China. A process sustainability analysis was performed based on energy, economic, and environmental (3E) factors. The energy efficiency analysis indicates that the TPG system is the most energy-efficient with 64% efficiency, followed by the wind power system at 63% and the hybrid solar-grid powered system at 60%. The economic analysis results indicate that the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCH) is 2.165 $/kg for the TPG system, 2.132 $/kg for the hybrid solar-grid powered system, and 2.060 $/kg for the wind power system. The environmental assessment suggests that wind powered are eco-friendly with a unit point total (µPt) of 1.11, compared to the solar-grid 1.50 µPt and TPG system's 1.70 µPt. Therefore, 3E analysis proposes wind powered process is more sustainable for blue H2 production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioresource Technology
Bioresource Technology 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
19.30%
发文量
2013
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Bioresource Technology publishes original articles, review articles, case studies, and short communications covering the fundamentals, applications, and management of bioresource technology. The journal seeks to advance and disseminate knowledge across various areas related to biomass, biological waste treatment, bioenergy, biotransformations, bioresource systems analysis, and associated conversion or production technologies. Topics include: • Biofuels: liquid and gaseous biofuels production, modeling and economics • Bioprocesses and bioproducts: biocatalysis and fermentations • Biomass and feedstocks utilization: bioconversion of agro-industrial residues • Environmental protection: biological waste treatment • Thermochemical conversion of biomass: combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, catalysis.
期刊最新文献
Biodiesel production, calcium recovery, and adsorbent synthesis using dairy sludge. Improved biohydrogen production using Ni/ZrxCeyO2 loaded on foam reactor through steam gasification of sewage sludge. Selective phthalate removal by molecularly imprinted biomass carbon modified electro-Fenton cathode. Pretreated sugarcane bagasse matches performance of synthetic media for lipid production with Yarrowia lipolytica. Comprehensive effects of biochar-assisted nitrogen and phosphorus bioremediation on hydrocarbon removal and microecological improvement in petroleum-contaminated soil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1