Pasquale Tripodi, Rosa D'Alessandro, Annalisa Cocozza, Gabriele Campanelli
{"title":"剖析栽培番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)种质资源的遗传多样性:通过毛细管电泳和高分辨率熔融对 ddRADseq 基因分型和微卫星分析进行比较。","authors":"Pasquale Tripodi, Rosa D'Alessandro, Annalisa Cocozza, Gabriele Campanelli","doi":"10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the genetic diversity of crops is of fundamental importance for the efficient use and improvement of germplasm resources. Different molecular genotyping systems have been implemented for population structure and phylogenetic relationships analyses, among which, microsatellites (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers have been the most widely used. This study reports the efficacy of SNPs detected via double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) and SSRs analyzed via capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high-resolution melting (HRM) in tomato. In total, 21,020 high-quality SNPs, 20 CE-SSRs, and 17 HRM-SSR markers were assayed in a panel of 72 accessions that included a diversified set of landraces, long-shelf-life cultivars and heirlooms with different origins and fruit typology. The results showed how the population structure analysis was consistent using the three genotyping methods, although SNPs were more efficient in distinguishing cultivar types and in measuring the degree of accessions' similarity. Compared to CE-SSR, the analysis of microsatellites via HRM yielded a slightly higher number of alleles (98 vs<i>.</i> 96). HRM-SSR demonstrated a distinction between European and non-European germplasm, better resolving the collection's diversity and being more consistent with SNP data. Phylogenetic trees drawn with independent marker data, detected specific groups of accessions showing robust clusters, highlighting how heirlooms were less heterogeneous than landraces. In addition, the fixation index (<i>F</i> <sub><i>ST</i></sub> ) revealed a high genetic differentiation between heirlooms and long-shelf-life cultivars, with SNP and SSR-HRM data emphasizing the distinction between cherry and plum types and CE-SSR data between cherry and oxheart types. In all instances, a greater molecular variance was found within the different considered biological statuses, provenances, and typologies rather than among them. This work presents the first attempt to compare the three tomato genotyping techniques in tomato. Findings highlighted how the markers used are complementary for genetic diversity analysis, with SNPs providing better insight and HRM-SSR as a viable alternative to capillary electrophoresis to dissect the genetic structure.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":7067,"journal":{"name":"3 Biotech","volume":"14 12","pages":"296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissecting the genetic diversity of cultivated tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>) germplasm resources: a comparison of ddRADseq genotyping and microsatellite analysis via capillary electrophoresis and high-resolution melting.\",\"authors\":\"Pasquale Tripodi, Rosa D'Alessandro, Annalisa Cocozza, Gabriele Campanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the genetic diversity of crops is of fundamental importance for the efficient use and improvement of germplasm resources. Different molecular genotyping systems have been implemented for population structure and phylogenetic relationships analyses, among which, microsatellites (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers have been the most widely used. This study reports the efficacy of SNPs detected via double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) and SSRs analyzed via capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high-resolution melting (HRM) in tomato. In total, 21,020 high-quality SNPs, 20 CE-SSRs, and 17 HRM-SSR markers were assayed in a panel of 72 accessions that included a diversified set of landraces, long-shelf-life cultivars and heirlooms with different origins and fruit typology. The results showed how the population structure analysis was consistent using the three genotyping methods, although SNPs were more efficient in distinguishing cultivar types and in measuring the degree of accessions' similarity. Compared to CE-SSR, the analysis of microsatellites via HRM yielded a slightly higher number of alleles (98 vs<i>.</i> 96). HRM-SSR demonstrated a distinction between European and non-European germplasm, better resolving the collection's diversity and being more consistent with SNP data. Phylogenetic trees drawn with independent marker data, detected specific groups of accessions showing robust clusters, highlighting how heirlooms were less heterogeneous than landraces. In addition, the fixation index (<i>F</i> <sub><i>ST</i></sub> ) revealed a high genetic differentiation between heirlooms and long-shelf-life cultivars, with SNP and SSR-HRM data emphasizing the distinction between cherry and plum types and CE-SSR data between cherry and oxheart types. In all instances, a greater molecular variance was found within the different considered biological statuses, provenances, and typologies rather than among them. This work presents the first attempt to compare the three tomato genotyping techniques in tomato. Findings highlighted how the markers used are complementary for genetic diversity analysis, with SNPs providing better insight and HRM-SSR as a viable alternative to capillary electrophoresis to dissect the genetic structure.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3 Biotech\",\"volume\":\"14 12\",\"pages\":\"296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3 Biotech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3 Biotech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
了解作物的遗传多样性对于有效利用和改良种质资源至关重要。目前已有不同的分子基因分型系统用于种群结构和系统发育关系分析,其中微卫星(SSR)和单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)标记应用最为广泛。本研究报告了番茄中通过双酶切限制性位点相关 DNA 测序(ddRADseq)检测的 SNPs 以及通过毛细管电泳(CE)和高分辨率熔融(HRM)分析的 SSRs 的功效。在一个由 72 个品种组成的小组中,共检测了 21,020 个高质量 SNPs、20 个 CE-SSR 和 17 个 HRM-SSR 标记,这些品种包括不同来源和果实类型的多样化陆生品种、长货架期栽培品种和传家品种。结果表明,尽管 SNP 在区分栽培品种类型和衡量加入品系的相似程度方面更有效,但使用这三种基因分型方法进行的种群结构分析是一致的。与 CE-SSR 相比,通过 HRM 分析微卫星得到的等位基因数量略高(98 对 96)。HRM-SSR 显示了欧洲种质与非欧洲种质之间的区别,更好地解析了收集的多样性,并与 SNP 数据更加一致。利用独立标记数据绘制的系统发育树检测到了特定的入选种群,显示出强大的聚类,突出了传家宝的异质性低于陆生品系。此外,固定指数(F ST)显示了传家宝和长货架期栽培品种之间的高度遗传分化,SNP 和 SSR-HRM 数据强调了樱桃和李子类型之间的区别,而 CE-SSR 数据则强调了樱桃和牛心类型之间的区别。在所有情况下,不同生物状态、产地和类型之间的分子差异更大。这项研究首次尝试对三种番茄基因分型技术进行比较。研究结果凸显了所使用的标记在遗传多样性分析中的互补性,SNPs 提供了更好的洞察力,HRM-SSR 是毛细管电泳剖析遗传结构的可行替代方法:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0。
Dissecting the genetic diversity of cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) germplasm resources: a comparison of ddRADseq genotyping and microsatellite analysis via capillary electrophoresis and high-resolution melting.
Understanding the genetic diversity of crops is of fundamental importance for the efficient use and improvement of germplasm resources. Different molecular genotyping systems have been implemented for population structure and phylogenetic relationships analyses, among which, microsatellites (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers have been the most widely used. This study reports the efficacy of SNPs detected via double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) and SSRs analyzed via capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high-resolution melting (HRM) in tomato. In total, 21,020 high-quality SNPs, 20 CE-SSRs, and 17 HRM-SSR markers were assayed in a panel of 72 accessions that included a diversified set of landraces, long-shelf-life cultivars and heirlooms with different origins and fruit typology. The results showed how the population structure analysis was consistent using the three genotyping methods, although SNPs were more efficient in distinguishing cultivar types and in measuring the degree of accessions' similarity. Compared to CE-SSR, the analysis of microsatellites via HRM yielded a slightly higher number of alleles (98 vs. 96). HRM-SSR demonstrated a distinction between European and non-European germplasm, better resolving the collection's diversity and being more consistent with SNP data. Phylogenetic trees drawn with independent marker data, detected specific groups of accessions showing robust clusters, highlighting how heirlooms were less heterogeneous than landraces. In addition, the fixation index (FST ) revealed a high genetic differentiation between heirlooms and long-shelf-life cultivars, with SNP and SSR-HRM data emphasizing the distinction between cherry and plum types and CE-SSR data between cherry and oxheart types. In all instances, a greater molecular variance was found within the different considered biological statuses, provenances, and typologies rather than among them. This work presents the first attempt to compare the three tomato genotyping techniques in tomato. Findings highlighted how the markers used are complementary for genetic diversity analysis, with SNPs providing better insight and HRM-SSR as a viable alternative to capillary electrophoresis to dissect the genetic structure.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-024-04141-0.
3 BiotechAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
314
期刊介绍:
3 Biotech publishes the results of the latest research related to the study and application of biotechnology to:
- Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Agriculture
- The Environment
The focus on these three technology sectors recognizes that complete Biotechnology applications often require a combination of techniques. 3 Biotech not only presents the latest developments in biotechnology but also addresses the problems and benefits of integrating a variety of techniques for a particular application. 3 Biotech will appeal to scientists and engineers in both academia and industry focused on the safe and efficient application of Biotechnology to Medicine, Agriculture and the Environment.