Ming Yang, Jie Xu, Jing Xue, Yuesong Pan, Aichun Cheng, Feng Gao, Xia Meng, Zhongrong Miao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang
{"title":"根据 hsCRP 水平和 CYP2C19 基因型确定缺血性脑卒中后双重抗血小板疗法的疗效","authors":"Ming Yang, Jie Xu, Jing Xue, Yuesong Pan, Aichun Cheng, Feng Gao, Xia Meng, Zhongrong Miao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and CYP2C19 genotypes are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (LoFA) carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels using the CHANCE trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with both of CYP2C19 major alleles information (*2, *3, and *17) and hsCRP measurements were enrolled from the prespecified subgroup. CYP2C19 LoFA carriers were defined as patients with either*2 or *3 allele. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2801 patients, 1646 (58.8%) were LoFA carriers, and 922 (32.9%) had elevated hsCRP. In patients with non-elevated hsCRP, there was a significant interaction effect between CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status and dual/single antiplatelet regimens for prevention of recurrent stroke and combined vascular events (p =0.048, 0.048, respectively), but, not in patients with elevated hsCRP (p =0.502, 0.472, respectively). Only among patients with non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA, dual antiplatelets significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin alone (hazard ratio= 0.44 [0.26-0.74], p=0.003). No significant differences in bleeding were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA may predict a better response to dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing stroke recurrence and composite vascular events for patients with minor stroke and high-risk TIA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979589.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet therapy after Ischemic Stroke According to hsCRP Levels and CYP2C19 Genotype.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Yang, Jie Xu, Jing Xue, Yuesong Pan, Aichun Cheng, Feng Gao, Xia Meng, Zhongrong Miao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and CYP2C19 genotypes are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (LoFA) carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels using the CHANCE trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with both of CYP2C19 major alleles information (*2, *3, and *17) and hsCRP measurements were enrolled from the prespecified subgroup. CYP2C19 LoFA carriers were defined as patients with either*2 or *3 allele. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2801 patients, 1646 (58.8%) were LoFA carriers, and 922 (32.9%) had elevated hsCRP. In patients with non-elevated hsCRP, there was a significant interaction effect between CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status and dual/single antiplatelet regimens for prevention of recurrent stroke and combined vascular events (p =0.048, 0.048, respectively), but, not in patients with elevated hsCRP (p =0.502, 0.472, respectively). Only among patients with non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA, dual antiplatelets significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin alone (hazard ratio= 0.44 [0.26-0.74], p=0.003). No significant differences in bleeding were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA may predict a better response to dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing stroke recurrence and composite vascular events for patients with minor stroke and high-risk TIA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979589.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet therapy after Ischemic Stroke According to hsCRP Levels and CYP2C19 Genotype.
Background: Both high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and CYP2C19 genotypes are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (LoFA) carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels using the CHANCE trial.
Methods: Subjects with both of CYP2C19 major alleles information (*2, *3, and *17) and hsCRP measurements were enrolled from the prespecified subgroup. CYP2C19 LoFA carriers were defined as patients with either*2 or *3 allele. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke within 90 days.
Results: Among 2801 patients, 1646 (58.8%) were LoFA carriers, and 922 (32.9%) had elevated hsCRP. In patients with non-elevated hsCRP, there was a significant interaction effect between CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status and dual/single antiplatelet regimens for prevention of recurrent stroke and combined vascular events (p =0.048, 0.048, respectively), but, not in patients with elevated hsCRP (p =0.502, 0.472, respectively). Only among patients with non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA, dual antiplatelets significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin alone (hazard ratio= 0.44 [0.26-0.74], p=0.003). No significant differences in bleeding were found.
Conclusions: Non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA may predict a better response to dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing stroke recurrence and composite vascular events for patients with minor stroke and high-risk TIA.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.