{"title":"葡萄糖酸氯己定双重清洗法预防新生儿重症监护室手术患者手术部位感染的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Jin Ah Kwon, Min Jeng Cho","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Ah Kwon, Min Jeng Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients.
Purpose: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.
Methods: A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.
Results: The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.
Conclusion: CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).