评审标准(JCIs)的应用与行政控制实践在提高医疗服务质量方面的互动效应:对也门医院的研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11894-0
Ammar Ali Alraimi, Murad Mohammed Al-Nashmi
{"title":"评审标准(JCIs)的应用与行政控制实践在提高医疗服务质量方面的互动效应:对也门医院的研究。","authors":"Ammar Ali Alraimi, Murad Mohammed Al-Nashmi","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11894-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to examine the interactive effect of applying JCI accreditation standards and administrative control in improving the quality of health services in Yemeni hospitals. By examining the synergistic relationship between these two components, this study sought to shed light on how hospitals can improve their performance and achieve sustainable advancements in healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a quantitative research design and collected data from Yemeni hospitals. The sample size was determined via the Krejcie and Morgan table, which provides a recommended sample size on the basis of the population. A total of 310 healthcare professionals were selected through a random sampling technique. Hypotheses were formulated to examine the impact of JCI accreditation standards and administrative control on healthcare quality. Statistical analyses were also conducted to test these hypotheses and determine the interaction effect between the two variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results confirmed that applying JCI accreditation standards has a statistically significant positive effect on improving the quality of health services in hospitals. Additionally, the practice of administrative control had a statistically significant effect on healthcare quality. Furthermore, there was an interactive effect between the application of JCI accreditation standards and administrative control, indicating that their combined implementation led to even greater improvements in healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform healthcare policymakers, administrators, and practitioners about the importance of integrating accreditation standards with robust administrative control measures. The findings emphasize the need for hospitals to prioritize both the implementation of accreditation standards and the establishment of effective administrative control systems to ensure the delivery of high-quality healthcare services. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the interactive impact of these factors and providing insights into their synergistic relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interactive effect of the application of accreditation standards (JCIs) and the practice of administrative control in improving the quality of health services: a study on Yemeni hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Ammar Ali Alraimi, Murad Mohammed Al-Nashmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11894-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to examine the interactive effect of applying JCI accreditation standards and administrative control in improving the quality of health services in Yemeni hospitals. By examining the synergistic relationship between these two components, this study sought to shed light on how hospitals can improve their performance and achieve sustainable advancements in healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a quantitative research design and collected data from Yemeni hospitals. The sample size was determined via the Krejcie and Morgan table, which provides a recommended sample size on the basis of the population. A total of 310 healthcare professionals were selected through a random sampling technique. Hypotheses were formulated to examine the impact of JCI accreditation standards and administrative control on healthcare quality. Statistical analyses were also conducted to test these hypotheses and determine the interaction effect between the two variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results confirmed that applying JCI accreditation standards has a statistically significant positive effect on improving the quality of health services in hospitals. Additionally, the practice of administrative control had a statistically significant effect on healthcare quality. Furthermore, there was an interactive effect between the application of JCI accreditation standards and administrative control, indicating that their combined implementation led to even greater improvements in healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform healthcare policymakers, administrators, and practitioners about the importance of integrating accreditation standards with robust administrative control measures. The findings emphasize the need for hospitals to prioritize both the implementation of accreditation standards and the establishment of effective administrative control systems to ensure the delivery of high-quality healthcare services. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the interactive impact of these factors and providing insights into their synergistic relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11894-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11894-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在探讨 JCI 评审标准和行政控制在提高也门医院医疗服务质量方面的交互作用。通过研究这两个部分之间的协同关系,本研究试图揭示医院如何才能提高其绩效并实现医疗质量的可持续发展:本研究采用定量研究设计,从也门医院收集数据。样本量是根据克雷西和摩根表确定的,该表提供了基于人口的建议样本量。通过随机抽样技术,共选取了 310 名医护人员。研究人员提出了假设,以探讨 JCI 评审标准和行政控制对医疗质量的影响。还进行了统计分析,以检验这些假设并确定两个变量之间的交互效应:结果证实,在统计学上,JCI 评审标准的应用对提高医院的医疗服务质量具有显著的积极影响。此外,行政控制实践对医疗质量也有统计学意义上的显著影响。此外,JCI评审标准的应用与行政控制之间存在互动效应,这表明两者的结合实施会进一步提高医疗质量:本研究的意义在于,它有可能让医疗决策者、管理者和从业人员了解将评审标准与强有力的行政控制措施相结合的重要性。研究结果强调,医院需要优先实施评审标准和建立有效的行政控制系统,以确保提供高质量的医疗服务。本研究强调了这些因素的交互影响,并深入探讨了它们之间的协同关系,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The interactive effect of the application of accreditation standards (JCIs) and the practice of administrative control in improving the quality of health services: a study on Yemeni hospitals.

Background: This study aimed to examine the interactive effect of applying JCI accreditation standards and administrative control in improving the quality of health services in Yemeni hospitals. By examining the synergistic relationship between these two components, this study sought to shed light on how hospitals can improve their performance and achieve sustainable advancements in healthcare quality.

Methods: This study utilized a quantitative research design and collected data from Yemeni hospitals. The sample size was determined via the Krejcie and Morgan table, which provides a recommended sample size on the basis of the population. A total of 310 healthcare professionals were selected through a random sampling technique. Hypotheses were formulated to examine the impact of JCI accreditation standards and administrative control on healthcare quality. Statistical analyses were also conducted to test these hypotheses and determine the interaction effect between the two variables.

Results: The results confirmed that applying JCI accreditation standards has a statistically significant positive effect on improving the quality of health services in hospitals. Additionally, the practice of administrative control had a statistically significant effect on healthcare quality. Furthermore, there was an interactive effect between the application of JCI accreditation standards and administrative control, indicating that their combined implementation led to even greater improvements in healthcare quality.

Conclusion: The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform healthcare policymakers, administrators, and practitioners about the importance of integrating accreditation standards with robust administrative control measures. The findings emphasize the need for hospitals to prioritize both the implementation of accreditation standards and the establishment of effective administrative control systems to ensure the delivery of high-quality healthcare services. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the interactive impact of these factors and providing insights into their synergistic relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the experiences of resident doctors in child and adolescent psychiatry with virtual reality-based simulation training: a qualitative study. Distribution and predictors of haemophilia-related costs in the United Kingdom: analysis of the CHESS I and CHESS II burden of illness studies. Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care. Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in Sichuan Province, China. How to assess doctor managers' managerial attitude: results from an e-Delphi process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1