在六个癌症中心实施基于患者报告结果的电子症状管理计划的策略。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11536-5
Michael Hassett, Samira Dias, Christine Cronin, Deborah Schrag, Nadine McCleary, Jaclyn Simpson, Tiana Poirier-Shelton, Jessica Bian, James Reich, Don Dizon, Megan Begnoche, Hannah Hazard Jenkins, Laura Tasker, Sandra Wong, Loretta Pearson, Roshan Paudel, Raymond U Osarogiagbon
{"title":"在六个癌症中心实施基于患者报告结果的电子症状管理计划的策略。","authors":"Michael Hassett, Samira Dias, Christine Cronin, Deborah Schrag, Nadine McCleary, Jaclyn Simpson, Tiana Poirier-Shelton, Jessica Bian, James Reich, Don Dizon, Megan Begnoche, Hannah Hazard Jenkins, Laura Tasker, Sandra Wong, Loretta Pearson, Roshan Paudel, Raymond U Osarogiagbon","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11536-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management improves cancer patients' outcomes. However, implementation of ePROs is challenging, requiring technical resources for integration into clinical systems, substantial buy-in from clinicians and patients, novel workflows to support between-visit symptom management, and institutional investment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SIMPRO Research Consortium developed eSyM, an electronic health record-integrated, ePRO-based symptom management program for medical oncology and surgery patients and deployed it at six cancer centers between August 2019 and April 2022 in a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized stepped-wedge study. Sites documented implementation strategies monthly using REDCap, itemized them using the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) list and mapped their target barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inform eSyM program enhancement, facilitate inter-consortium knowledge sharing and guide future deployment efforts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We documented 226 implementation strategies: 35 'foundational' strategies were applied consortium-wide by the coordinating center and 191 other strategies were developed by individual sites. We consolidated these 191 site-developed strategies into 64 unique strategies (i.e., removed duplicates) and classified the remainder as either 'universal', consistently used by multiple sites (N = 29), or 'adaptive', used only by individual sites (N = 35). Universal strategies were perceived as having the highest impact; they addressed eSyM clinical preparation, training, engagement of patients/clinicians, and program evaluation. Across all documented SIMPRO strategies, 44 of the 73 ERIC strategies were addressed and all 5 CFIR barriers were addressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methodical collection of theory-based implementation strategies fostered the identification of universal, high-impact strategies that facilitated adoption of a novel care-delivery intervention by patients, clinicians, and institutions. Attention to the high-impact strategies identified in this project could support implementation of ePROs as a component of routine cancer care at other institutions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03850912. February 22, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03850912?term=hassett&draw=2&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for implementing an electronic patient-reported outcomes-based symptom management program across six cancer centers.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Hassett, Samira Dias, Christine Cronin, Deborah Schrag, Nadine McCleary, Jaclyn Simpson, Tiana Poirier-Shelton, Jessica Bian, James Reich, Don Dizon, Megan Begnoche, Hannah Hazard Jenkins, Laura Tasker, Sandra Wong, Loretta Pearson, Roshan Paudel, Raymond U Osarogiagbon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11536-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management improves cancer patients' outcomes. However, implementation of ePROs is challenging, requiring technical resources for integration into clinical systems, substantial buy-in from clinicians and patients, novel workflows to support between-visit symptom management, and institutional investment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SIMPRO Research Consortium developed eSyM, an electronic health record-integrated, ePRO-based symptom management program for medical oncology and surgery patients and deployed it at six cancer centers between August 2019 and April 2022 in a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized stepped-wedge study. Sites documented implementation strategies monthly using REDCap, itemized them using the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) list and mapped their target barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inform eSyM program enhancement, facilitate inter-consortium knowledge sharing and guide future deployment efforts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We documented 226 implementation strategies: 35 'foundational' strategies were applied consortium-wide by the coordinating center and 191 other strategies were developed by individual sites. We consolidated these 191 site-developed strategies into 64 unique strategies (i.e., removed duplicates) and classified the remainder as either 'universal', consistently used by multiple sites (N = 29), or 'adaptive', used only by individual sites (N = 35). Universal strategies were perceived as having the highest impact; they addressed eSyM clinical preparation, training, engagement of patients/clinicians, and program evaluation. Across all documented SIMPRO strategies, 44 of the 73 ERIC strategies were addressed and all 5 CFIR barriers were addressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methodical collection of theory-based implementation strategies fostered the identification of universal, high-impact strategies that facilitated adoption of a novel care-delivery intervention by patients, clinicians, and institutions. Attention to the high-impact strategies identified in this project could support implementation of ePROs as a component of routine cancer care at other institutions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03850912. February 22, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03850912?term=hassett&draw=2&rank=1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11536-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11536-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于患者电子报告结果(ePRO)的症状管理可改善癌症患者的预后。然而,ePRO 的实施具有挑战性,需要整合到临床系统中的技术资源、临床医生和患者的大力支持、支持就诊间症状管理的新型工作流程以及机构投资:SIMPRO研究联盟为肿瘤内科和外科患者开发了基于电子病历的症状管理项目eSyM,并于2019年8月至2022年4月期间在六家癌症中心进行了部署,这是一项II型混合有效性实施群组随机阶梯式研究。各研究机构每月使用 REDCap 记录实施策略,使用实施变革专家建议(ERIC)列表将其逐项列出,并使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)绘制其目标障碍图,以便为 eSyM 计划的改进提供信息,促进研究机构间的知识共享并指导未来的部署工作:结果:我们记录了 226 项实施策略:结果:我们记录了 226 项实施策略:35 项 "基础 "策略由协调中心在整个联盟范围内实施,另外 191 项策略由各个项目点制定。我们将这 191 个站点制定的策略合并为 64 个独特策略(即删除重复策略),并将其余策略分为 "通用 "策略(多个站点一致使用)(N = 29)或 "适应性 "策略(仅个别站点使用)(N = 35)。通用策略被认为影响最大;这些策略涉及 eSyM 临床准备、培训、患者/临床医生参与和项目评估。在所有记录在案的 SIMPRO 策略中,73 项 ERIC 策略中有 44 项得到了解决,所有 5 项 CFIR 障碍都得到了解决:结论:对以理论为基础的实施策略进行有条不紊的收集,有助于确定普遍、高效的策略,从而促进患者、临床医生和医疗机构采用新型护理干预措施。关注本项目中发现的高效策略可支持其他机构将 ePROs 作为常规癌症护理的一部分加以实施:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT03850912。2019年2月22日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03850912?term=hassett&draw=2&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies for implementing an electronic patient-reported outcomes-based symptom management program across six cancer centers.

Background: Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management improves cancer patients' outcomes. However, implementation of ePROs is challenging, requiring technical resources for integration into clinical systems, substantial buy-in from clinicians and patients, novel workflows to support between-visit symptom management, and institutional investment.

Methods: The SIMPRO Research Consortium developed eSyM, an electronic health record-integrated, ePRO-based symptom management program for medical oncology and surgery patients and deployed it at six cancer centers between August 2019 and April 2022 in a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized stepped-wedge study. Sites documented implementation strategies monthly using REDCap, itemized them using the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) list and mapped their target barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inform eSyM program enhancement, facilitate inter-consortium knowledge sharing and guide future deployment efforts.

Results: We documented 226 implementation strategies: 35 'foundational' strategies were applied consortium-wide by the coordinating center and 191 other strategies were developed by individual sites. We consolidated these 191 site-developed strategies into 64 unique strategies (i.e., removed duplicates) and classified the remainder as either 'universal', consistently used by multiple sites (N = 29), or 'adaptive', used only by individual sites (N = 35). Universal strategies were perceived as having the highest impact; they addressed eSyM clinical preparation, training, engagement of patients/clinicians, and program evaluation. Across all documented SIMPRO strategies, 44 of the 73 ERIC strategies were addressed and all 5 CFIR barriers were addressed.

Conclusion: Methodical collection of theory-based implementation strategies fostered the identification of universal, high-impact strategies that facilitated adoption of a novel care-delivery intervention by patients, clinicians, and institutions. Attention to the high-impact strategies identified in this project could support implementation of ePROs as a component of routine cancer care at other institutions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03850912. February 22, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03850912?term=hassett&draw=2&rank=1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the experiences of resident doctors in child and adolescent psychiatry with virtual reality-based simulation training: a qualitative study. Distribution and predictors of haemophilia-related costs in the United Kingdom: analysis of the CHESS I and CHESS II burden of illness studies. Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care. Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in Sichuan Province, China. How to assess doctor managers' managerial attitude: results from an e-Delphi process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1