{"title":"同期化放疗联合杜伐单抗巩固治疗后复发的不可切除局部晚期非小细胞肺癌后续治疗的疗效:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Yuichiro Nishibori , Hirotsugu Kenmotsu , Kenju Ando , Ayumi Tonsho , Suguru Matsuda , Meiko Morita , Motoki Sekikawa , Kosei Doshita , Noboru Morikawa , Keita Miura , Hiroaki Kodama , Michitoshi Yabe , Yuko Iida , Nobuaki Mamesaya , Haruki Kobayashi , Ryo Ko , Kazushige Wakuda , Akira Ono , Tateaki Naito , Haruyasu Murakami , Toshiaki Takahashi","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The current standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy. Although the trial revealed the survival benefit of adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to the population, the optimal treatment strategy and efficacy of subsequent treatment after relapse remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively collected data from patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who completed platinum-based CCRT as first-line treatment. Patients who received molecular-targeted therapy for driver gene alterations or did not receive durvalumab as consolidation therapy following the approval were excluded. We assessed differences in regimen and efficacy of subsequent treatment in patients who underwent durvalumab consolidation therapy (D group) and those who did not (CR group).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 62 eligible patients, 32 were assigned to the D group and 30 to the CR group. Patients in the CR group were more frequently treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen than those in the D group (57 % vs. 13 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001). The median overall survival from initiation of subsequent treatment was shorter in the D group than in the CR group (13.0 months vs. 26.7 months, hazard ratio 2.60; 95 % confidence interval: 1.28–2.56, <em>p</em> = 0.008).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who relapsed after durvalumab consolidation therapy received an ICI-containing regimen less frequently, and the efficacy of the subsequent treatment was limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100849"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of subsequent treatment for unresectable locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer after relapse of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab consolidation therapy: A single-center retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Yuichiro Nishibori , Hirotsugu Kenmotsu , Kenju Ando , Ayumi Tonsho , Suguru Matsuda , Meiko Morita , Motoki Sekikawa , Kosei Doshita , Noboru Morikawa , Keita Miura , Hiroaki Kodama , Michitoshi Yabe , Yuko Iida , Nobuaki Mamesaya , Haruki Kobayashi , Ryo Ko , Kazushige Wakuda , Akira Ono , Tateaki Naito , Haruyasu Murakami , Toshiaki Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The current standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy. Although the trial revealed the survival benefit of adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to the population, the optimal treatment strategy and efficacy of subsequent treatment after relapse remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively collected data from patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who completed platinum-based CCRT as first-line treatment. Patients who received molecular-targeted therapy for driver gene alterations or did not receive durvalumab as consolidation therapy following the approval were excluded. We assessed differences in regimen and efficacy of subsequent treatment in patients who underwent durvalumab consolidation therapy (D group) and those who did not (CR group).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 62 eligible patients, 32 were assigned to the D group and 30 to the CR group. Patients in the CR group were more frequently treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen than those in the D group (57 % vs. 13 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001). The median overall survival from initiation of subsequent treatment was shorter in the D group than in the CR group (13.0 months vs. 26.7 months, hazard ratio 2.60; 95 % confidence interval: 1.28–2.56, <em>p</em> = 0.008).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who relapsed after durvalumab consolidation therapy received an ICI-containing regimen less frequently, and the efficacy of the subsequent treatment was limited.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
治疗目标目前局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(LA-NSCLC)的标准治疗方法是同期化放疗(CCRT),然后进行durvalumab巩固治疗。尽管该试验揭示了在人群中添加免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的生存获益,但最佳治疗策略和复发后后续治疗的疗效仍不清楚:我们回顾性地收集了完成铂类CCRT一线治疗的不可切除LA-NSCLC患者的数据。排除了因驱动基因改变而接受分子靶向治疗的患者,也排除了在获得批准后未接受durvalumab作为巩固治疗的患者。我们评估了接受德伐卢单抗巩固治疗的患者(D组)与未接受德伐卢单抗巩固治疗的患者(CR组)在治疗方案和后续疗效方面的差异:在62名符合条件的患者中,32人被分配到D组,30人被分配到CR组。CR组患者接受含免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)方案治疗的比例高于D组(57%对13%,P<0.001)。D组患者自开始后续治疗起的中位总生存期短于CR组(13.0个月 vs. 26.7个月,危险比2.60;95%置信区间:1.28-2.56,p = 0.008):结论:经德伐卢单抗巩固治疗后复发的不可切除LA-NSCLC患者接受含ICI治疗的频率较低,且后续治疗的疗效有限。
Efficacy of subsequent treatment for unresectable locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer after relapse of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab consolidation therapy: A single-center retrospective study
Objectives
The current standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy. Although the trial revealed the survival benefit of adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to the population, the optimal treatment strategy and efficacy of subsequent treatment after relapse remain unclear.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively collected data from patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who completed platinum-based CCRT as first-line treatment. Patients who received molecular-targeted therapy for driver gene alterations or did not receive durvalumab as consolidation therapy following the approval were excluded. We assessed differences in regimen and efficacy of subsequent treatment in patients who underwent durvalumab consolidation therapy (D group) and those who did not (CR group).
Results
Among the 62 eligible patients, 32 were assigned to the D group and 30 to the CR group. Patients in the CR group were more frequently treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen than those in the D group (57 % vs. 13 %, p < 0.001). The median overall survival from initiation of subsequent treatment was shorter in the D group than in the CR group (13.0 months vs. 26.7 months, hazard ratio 2.60; 95 % confidence interval: 1.28–2.56, p = 0.008).
Conclusions
Patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who relapsed after durvalumab consolidation therapy received an ICI-containing regimen less frequently, and the efficacy of the subsequent treatment was limited.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.