{"title":"妊娠期抗精神病药物和情绪稳定剂的安全性比较：先天性畸形和产前结果的系统综述和网络 Meta 分析》（A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Congenital Malformations and Prenatal Outcomes.","authors":"Enhui Wang, Yilin Liu, Yucheng Wang, Xinyu Han, Yifang Zhou, Lingli Zhang, Yanqing Tang","doi":"10.1007/s40263-024-01131-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of congenital malformations and other prenatal outcomes in fetuses after exposure to antipsychotic medications and mood stabilizers during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 15 December 2023, to identify experimental and observational studies comparing antipsychotic and mood stabilizer treatments with control treatments (no exposure). The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of congenital malformations and the secondary outcomes were preterm birth and spontaneous abortion. Additionally, two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in each domain of the included studies using the ROBINS-I tool and evaluated the quality of evidence using the CINeMA rating tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 18,334 potential records, and 22 studies involving 3,042,997 pregnant women were ultimately included. Compared with the unexposed group, quetiapine [odds ratio (OR), 1.19; 95% credible interval (CrI), 1.01-1.39], aripiprazole (OR, 1.30; 95% CrI 1.10-1.65), olanzapine (OR, 1.33; 95% CrI 1.11-1.64), risperidone (OR, 1.43; 95% CrI 1.18-1.77), and lithium (OR, 1.61; 95% CrI 1.07-2.30) were associated with a slightly increased risk of congenital malformations. In contrast, lamotrigine (OR, 1.21; 95% CrI 0.86-1.64), ziprasidone (OR, 1.14; 95% CrI 0.73-1.72), and haloperidol (OR, 1.26; 95% CrI 0.90-1.75) did not show significant differences compared with the unexposed group, with narrower credible intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence from this analysis suggests that, overall, quetiapine has the lowest teratogenic risk when used during pregnancy, making it the safer option for pregnant women. Lamotrigine and haloperidol follow closely behind. At the same time, the use of lurasidone and ziprasidone should be approached with caution, and further clinical studies are necessary to better assess their safety.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD4201811373.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Safety of Antipsychotic Medications and Mood Stabilizers During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Congenital Malformations and Prenatal Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Enhui Wang, Yilin Liu, Yucheng Wang, Xinyu Han, Yifang Zhou, Lingli Zhang, Yanqing Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40263-024-01131-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of congenital malformations and other prenatal outcomes in fetuses after exposure to antipsychotic medications and mood stabilizers during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 15 December 2023, to identify experimental and observational studies comparing antipsychotic and mood stabilizer treatments with control treatments (no exposure). The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of congenital malformations and the secondary outcomes were preterm birth and spontaneous abortion. Additionally, two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in each domain of the included studies using the ROBINS-I tool and evaluated the quality of evidence using the CINeMA rating tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 18,334 potential records, and 22 studies involving 3,042,997 pregnant women were ultimately included. Compared with the unexposed group, quetiapine [odds ratio (OR), 1.19; 95% credible interval (CrI), 1.01-1.39], aripiprazole (OR, 1.30; 95% CrI 1.10-1.65), olanzapine (OR, 1.33; 95% CrI 1.11-1.64), risperidone (OR, 1.43; 95% CrI 1.18-1.77), and lithium (OR, 1.61; 95% CrI 1.07-2.30) were associated with a slightly increased risk of congenital malformations. In contrast, lamotrigine (OR, 1.21; 95% CrI 0.86-1.64), ziprasidone (OR, 1.14; 95% CrI 0.73-1.72), and haloperidol (OR, 1.26; 95% CrI 0.90-1.75) did not show significant differences compared with the unexposed group, with narrower credible intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence from this analysis suggests that, overall, quetiapine has the lowest teratogenic risk when used during pregnancy, making it the safer option for pregnant women. Lamotrigine and haloperidol follow closely behind. At the same time, the use of lurasidone and ziprasidone should be approached with caution, and further clinical studies are necessary to better assess their safety.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD4201811373.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-024-01131-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-024-01131-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Safety of Antipsychotic Medications and Mood Stabilizers During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Congenital Malformations and Prenatal Outcomes.
Background: A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of congenital malformations and other prenatal outcomes in fetuses after exposure to antipsychotic medications and mood stabilizers during pregnancy.
Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 15 December 2023, to identify experimental and observational studies comparing antipsychotic and mood stabilizer treatments with control treatments (no exposure). The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of congenital malformations and the secondary outcomes were preterm birth and spontaneous abortion. Additionally, two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in each domain of the included studies using the ROBINS-I tool and evaluated the quality of evidence using the CINeMA rating tool.
Results: The literature search identified 18,334 potential records, and 22 studies involving 3,042,997 pregnant women were ultimately included. Compared with the unexposed group, quetiapine [odds ratio (OR), 1.19; 95% credible interval (CrI), 1.01-1.39], aripiprazole (OR, 1.30; 95% CrI 1.10-1.65), olanzapine (OR, 1.33; 95% CrI 1.11-1.64), risperidone (OR, 1.43; 95% CrI 1.18-1.77), and lithium (OR, 1.61; 95% CrI 1.07-2.30) were associated with a slightly increased risk of congenital malformations. In contrast, lamotrigine (OR, 1.21; 95% CrI 0.86-1.64), ziprasidone (OR, 1.14; 95% CrI 0.73-1.72), and haloperidol (OR, 1.26; 95% CrI 0.90-1.75) did not show significant differences compared with the unexposed group, with narrower credible intervals.
Conclusions: The evidence from this analysis suggests that, overall, quetiapine has the lowest teratogenic risk when used during pregnancy, making it the safer option for pregnant women. Lamotrigine and haloperidol follow closely behind. At the same time, the use of lurasidone and ziprasidone should be approached with caution, and further clinical studies are necessary to better assess their safety.
期刊介绍：
CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes:
- Overviews of contentious or emerging issues.
- Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses.
- Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement.
- Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry.
- Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
