CNS drugs最新文献

Psychosis and agitation are among the most distressing neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) of Alzheimer's disease (AD), linked to faster disease progression and earlier admission to nursing homes. While nonpharmacological treatments may alleviate mild behavioral symptoms, more severe syndromes often require pharmacological intervention. Brexpiprazole is the only medication approved for agitation in AD, although its limited clinical efficacy has raised criticism. No drugs have been approved for treating psychosis in AD, highlighting the critical need for new, effective, and safe treatments. Recent studies have elucidated part of the neurobiological basis of NPSs in the AD brain, offering insights for testing repurposed and novel drugs. We conducted a comprehensive nonsystematic literature review, aiming to provide a critical overview of both current treatments and emerging pharmacological interventions under clinical development for treating psychosis and agitation in AD. Additionally, we present strategies to optimize the clinical development of new drug candidates. We identify three promising compounds that are currently in phase 3 trials: xanomeline-trospium for AD psychosis, and dextromethorphan-bupropion and dexmedetomidine for agitation in AD. We propose that biomarkers linked to the neuropsychiatric traits of AD patients should be identified in dedicated studies and then included in phase 2 dose-range-finding studies with novel compounds to establish biological engagement. Furthermore, phase 3 placebo-controlled studies should be carried out in AD biomarker-confirmed subjects with narrower cognitive impairment ranges and precise NPS severity at screening. Alternative study designs, such as sequential phase approaches, may also be adopted.

The relationship between cannabis use and mental health is complex, as studies often report seemingly contradictory findings regarding whether cannabis use results in more positive or negative treatment outcomes. With an increasing number of individuals using cannabis for both recreational (i.e., non-medical) and medical purposes, it is critical to gain a deeper understanding of the ways in which cannabis may be helpful or harmful for those diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. Although cannabis is composed of hundreds of compounds, studies assessing the effects of "cannabis" most often report the impact of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (d9-THC), the primary intoxicating constituent of the plant. While d9-THC has documented therapeutic properties, negative clinical outcomes commonly associated with cannabis are generally related to d9-THC exposure. In contrast, non-intoxicating cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) show promise as potential treatment options for psychiatric symptoms. In this article, findings from studies and reviews examining the relationship between mental health conditions (mood, anxiety, psychosis, and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) and cannabis use are summarized to highlight critical variables that are often overlooked, including those associated with cannabis use patterns (e.g., frequency of use, amount used, cannabinoid exposure, product choice, and route of administration). Further, this article explores individual factors (e.g., age, sex, genetics/family history) that likely impact cannabis-related outcomes. Research to date suggests that youth and those with a family history or genetic liability for psychiatric disorders are at higher risk for negative outcomes, while more research is needed to fully understand unique effects related to sex and older age.

There is a synergistic relationship between epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID), and the approach to managing people with these conditions needs to be holistic. Epilepsy is the main co-morbidity associated with ID, and clinical presentation tends to be complex, associated with higher rates of treatment resistance, multi-morbidity and premature mortality. Despite this relationship, there is limited level 1 evidence to inform treatment choice for this vulnerable population. This review updates the current evidence base for anti-seizure medication (ASM) prescribing for people with ID. Recommendations are made on the basis of evidence and expert clinical opinion and summarised into a Traffic Light System for accessibility. This review builds on work developed through UK's Royal College of Psychiatrists, Faculty of Intellectual Disability Psychiatry and includes newer pragmatic data from the Cornwall UK Ep-ID Research Register, a national research register for England and Wales that has been in existence for the last 10 years. The Register acts as a source for an in-depth exploration of the evidence base for prescribing 'newer' (third generation, specifically post-2004) ASMs. Its findings are discussed and compared. A practical approach to prescribing and choosing ASMs is recommended on the based evidence. This approach considers the drug profile, including adverse effects and clinical characteristics. The review also details newer specialist ASMs restricted to certain epilepsy syndromes, and potential future ASMs that may be available soon. For completeness, we also explore non-pharmacological interventions, including surgeries, to support epilepsy management.

Background and objectives: Ecopipam is a selective antagonist of the dopamine D1 receptor, and its efficacy and safety have recently been explored in several clinical trials involving patients with Tourette syndrome (TS). The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the pooled estimate for efficacy [in terms of reduction in tic Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores] and safety of oral ecopipam in subjects with TS.

Methods: All clinical trials that explored the efficacy and/or safety of ecopipam in patients with TS were included to determine the pooled estimate for change in YGTSS, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-TS, and the severity of comorbid attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD), obsessive compulsion disorder (OCD), and depressive symptoms, as well as the nature and frequency of adverse effects. Case-series, retrospective studies, and case reports were excluded. Databases, such as PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SCOPUS were searched to identify these trials using suitable combination of MESH terms/keywords on 15 June 2024. ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess the risk of bias in included randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized intervention studies, respectively, and the GRADE system to determine the certainty of the collated evidence.

Results: A total of 96 records were identified in the database search and 31 records were screened after removing duplicates. After excluding 23 irrelevant records, the full-text review included 8 records. Finally, six publications from three completed clinical trials (two RCTs, with one having an open-label extension) and one ongoing clinical trial were included. A total of 251 participants were included. The pooled estimate for mean change in YGTSS-TTS from baseline to the completion of the randomization period was statistically better in the ecopipam group compared with the placebo group [mean difference: - 3.0, 95% (confidence interval (CI) - 4.2 to - 1.9, I² = 55%, p < 0.0001]. The ecopipam group also fared statistically better in terms of YGTSS-motor tic score, phonic tic score, as well as CGI-TS-S (p < 0.0001). Changes in depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms were comparable in both groups, as well as the incidence of adverse effects.

Conclusions: Ecopipam is effective in reducing the severity of tics in subjects with TS and has a good safety profile. However, only a limited number of studies were included in the review, with some having small sample sizes and short duration of follow-up.