CNS drugs最新文献

Background: Opioid prescribing to injured workers has increased despite evidence demonstrating that risks often outweigh the benefits. High-risk prescribing and persistent opioid use are often associated with harm. However, there are limited data on what predicts early high-risk and persistent opioid prescribing in Australian workers with back and neck-related injuries or disorders.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and identify determinants of early high-risk and persistent opioid prescribing in Australian workers with back and neck conditions.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out with injured workers with workers' compensation claims for back and neck conditions who filled at least one opioid prescription within the first 90 days after injury from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019. High-risk opioid prescribing practices in the first 90 days were measured using one of four indicators of risk (high-total opioid volume on first dispensing occasion-exceeding 350 mg oral morphine equivalent in the first week, average high-dose over 90 days-higher than 50 mg oral morphine equivalent, early supply with long-acting opioids, and concurrent psychotropic prescriptions). Persistent opioid use was determined using group-based trajectory modeling over the subsequent 1-year. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of high-risk opioid prescribing in the first 90 days and persistent opioid use in the subsequent year.

Results: A total of 6278 injured workers prescribed opioids were included. At least one indicator of high-risk opioid prescribing was identified in 67.1% of the sample in the first 3 months. Persistent opioid use was identified in 22.8% of the sample over the subsequent year. Early high-risk opioid prescribing was associated with double the odds of persistent use (aOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.89-2.53). Injured workers residing in rural areas (inner regional and outer regional/remote Australia) had higher odds of high-risk prescribing (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.44) and (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.87), respectively, compared with those in major cities. Similarly, workers residing in areas with most disadvantaged and advantaged socioeconomic quintile had higher (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.39) and lower (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.82) odds of persistent opioid use, respectively, compared with those in the middle socioeconomic quintiles.

Conclusions: A total of two-thirds of injured workers receiving opioids in the first 90 days show evidence of high-risk prescribing, with nearly one-quarter exhibiting persistent opioid use over the subsequent year. Early high-risk opioid prescribing doubles the odds of opioid persistence. There is a need for further research and careful scrutiny of opioid prescribing in this population.

Background and objectives: The efficacy and safety of modified-release methylphenidate (MPH-MR) in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been shown in both pediatric and adult Caucasian patients. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of MPH-MR in Chinese children and adolescents with ADHD.

Methods: MICCA was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 19 sites in China from September 2018 to July 2021. The study enrolled children and adolescents aged 6 to < 18 years with a primary diagnosis of ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Patients were randomized 1:1 to once-daily MPH-MR (10-60 mg) or placebo. The study included an up-titration phase of up to 5 weeks and a dose maintenance phase of 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline to the end of the maintenance phase (EoM). Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline to EoM in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) total score, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores at EoM. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and vital signs.

Results: A total of 221 patients were randomized (MPH-MR: n = 110; placebo: n = 111). The change in the ADHD-RS-IV total score from baseline to EoM was significantly greater for MPH-MR versus placebo, with a least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) treatment difference of - 4.6 (- 6.92, - 2.30) (p < 0.001). The mean (95% CI) treatment difference for the WFIRS-P total score change from baseline to EoM also significantly favored MPH-MR over placebo (- 6.46 [- 10.57, - 2.34]; p = 0.002). The CGI-I score at EoM was significantly lower in the MPH-MR group compared to the placebo group (2.2 vs 2.5; p = 0.002). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 74 (67.3%) patients in the MPH-MR group and 55 (49.1%) patients in the placebo group. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. The most common TEAEs for MPH-MR were decreased appetite, nausea and upper respiratory tract infection. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation/study withdrawal were reported in 4 (3.6%) patients in the MPH-MR group and 1 (0.9%) patient in the placebo group. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs were observed during the study.

Conclusions: Modified-release methylphenidate was superior to placebo in improving ADHD symptoms and functioning in Chinese pediatric patients with ADHD. Modified-release methylphenidate had a good safety and tolerability profile. Trial Registration http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/ Identifier: CTR20180056 (registered on 21 May 2018).

Voltage-gated Kv7 potassium channels, particularly Kv7.2 and Kv.7.3 channels, play a critical role in modulating susceptibility to seizures, and mutations in genes that encode these channels cause heterogeneous epilepsy phenotypes. On the basis of this evidence, activation of Kv7.2 and Kv.7.3 channels has long been considered an attractive target in the search for novel antiseizure medications. Ezogabine (retigabine), the first Kv7.2/3 activator introduced in 2011 for the treatment of focal seizures, was withdrawn from the market in 2017 due to declining use after discovery of its association with pigmentation changes in the retina, skin, and mucosae. A novel formulation of ezogabine for pediatric use (XEN496) has been recently investigated in children with KCNQ2-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, but the trial was terminated prematurely for reasons unrelated to safety. Among novel Kv7.2/3 openers in clinical development, azetukalner has shown dose-dependent efficacy against drug-resistant focal seizures with a good tolerability profile and no evidence of pigmentation-related adverse effects in early clinical studies, and it is now under investigation in phase III trials for the treatment of focal seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and major depressive disorder. Another Kv7.2/3 activator, BHV-7000, has completed phase I studies in healthy subjects, with excellent tolerability at plasma drug concentrations that exceed the median effective concentrations in a preclinical model of anticonvulsant activity, but no efficacy data in patients with epilepsy are available to date. Among other Kv7.2/3 activators in clinical development as potential antiseizure medications, pynegabine and CB-003 have completed phase I safety and pharmacokinetic studies, but results have not been yet reported. Overall, interest in targeting Kv7 channels for the treatment of epilepsy and for other indications remains strong. Future breakthroughs in this area could come from exploitation of mechanistic differences in the action of Kv7 activators, and from the development of molecules that combine Kv7 activation with other mechanisms of action.

Background: In randomised controlled trials, adjunctive cenobamate (CNB) has been shown to reduce seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Studies conducted in real-world settings provide valuable complementary data to further characterise the drug's profile.

Objective: To assess the efficacy, retention and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate (CNB), and to identify factors that might predict these outcomes in the clinical treatment of focal epilepsies.

Methods: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study included all patients who began CNB treatment between October 2020 and April 2023 at seven participating epilepsy centres. Baseline and follow-up data were collected from patients' medical records, covering clinical characteristics and outcome data such as seizure frequency, dosing of CNB, physician-assessed Clinical Global Impression of Change, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), CNB retention and reasons for discontinuation.

Results: A total of 234 patients [mean age 40.7 ± 14 years, median 40 years, range 11-82 years; five adolescents under 18 years; 99 (42.3%) males] were analysed. The mean epilepsy duration at study entry was 23.2 ± 14.5 years (median 21 years, range 0.75-63 years), with the average age of epilepsy onset being 17.5 ± 13.0 years (median 17 years, range 0.1-71 years). The patients were taking a mean of 2.6 ± 0.8 (median 3) anti-seizure medications (ASMs) before starting CNB, and had failed a mean of 6 ± 3.3 (median 6) of further ASMs in the past. CNB exposure ranged from 5 to 1162 days, amounting to a total exposure time of 264.7 years. The retention rate was 92.6% at 3 months, 87.2% at 6 months and 77.8% at 12 months. At 3 months, 52.6% achieved a 50% seizure reduction, with 14.5% reporting seizure freedom; by 12 months, 47.7% maintained a 50% response rate and 11.9% were seizure-free. No significant differences in responder rates were observed based on sex, aetiology, seizure localisation, number of ASMs or target dose. The mean maximum CNB dose was 236.7 ± 97.4 mg (median 200 mg, range 12.5-450 mg), with 28 patients (12.0%) titrated up to 400 mg or above. During CNB treatment, 43.6% of patients were able to discontinue, and a further 24.4% were able to reduce the dose of a concomitant ASM. During CNB treatment, 144 patients (61.5%) experienced TEAEs. The most common TEAEs were sedation (n = 84, 35.9%), dizziness (n = 58, 24.8%) and ataxia (n = 23, 9.8%).

Conclusions: CNB showed a relatively high and clinically useful 50% responder rate of 47.7% and an overall retention of 77.8% at 1 year. We were unable to identify specific predictors for response and retention, indicating that CNB may be beneficial for patients with a history of multiple failed ASMs, a high number of concomitant ASMs and any localisation or aetiology of focal epilepsy.

Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is implicated as a necessary factor in the development of multiple sclerosis (MS) and may also be a driver of disease activity. Although it is not clear whether ongoing viral replication is the driver for MS pathology, MS researchers have considered the prospect of using drugs with potential efficacy against EBV in the treatment of MS. We have undertaken scientific and lived experience expert panel reviews to shortlist existing licensed therapies that could be used in later-stage clinical trials in MS.

Methods: A list of therapies with anti-EBV effects was developed from existing reviews. A detailed review of pre-clinical and clinical data was undertaken to assess these candidates for potential usefulness and possible harm in MS. A 'drug-CV' and a plain language version focusing on tolerability aspects was created for each candidate. We used validated criteria to score each candidate with an international scientific panel and people living with MS.

Results: A preliminary list of 11 drug candidates was generated. Following review by the scientific and lived experience expert panels, six yielded the same highest score. A further review by the expert panel shortlisted four drugs (famciclovir, tenofovir alafenamide, maribavir and spironolactone) deemed to have the best balance of efficacy, safety and tolerability for use in MS.

Conclusions: Scientific and lived experience expert panel review of anti-EBV therapies selected four candidates with evidence for efficacy against EBV and acceptable safety and tolerability for potential use in phase III clinical trials for MS.

The negative symptoms of schizophrenia include diminished emotional expression, avolition, alogia, anhedonia, and asociality, and due to their low responsiveness to available treatments, are a primary driver of functional disability in schizophrenia. This narrative review has the aim of providing a comprehensive overview of the current research developments in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia, and begins by introducing the concepts of primary, secondary, prominent, predominant, and broadly defined negative symptoms. We then compare and contrast commonly used research assessment scales for negative symptoms and review the evidence for the specific utility of widely available off-label and investigational treatments that have been studied for negative symptoms. Mechanism of action/putative treatments included are antipsychotics (D₂R antagonists), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and other glutamatergic modulators, serotonin receptor (5-HTR) modulators, anti-inflammatory agents, antidepressants, pro-dopaminergic modulators (non-D₂R antagonists), acetylcholine modulators, oxytocin, and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors. With the caveat that no compounds are definitively proven as gold-standard treatments for broadly defined negative symptoms, the evidence base supports several potentially beneficial off-label and investigational medications for treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia, such as monotherapy with cariprazine, olanzapine, clozapine, and amisulpride, or adjunctive use of memantine, setrons such as ondansetron, minocycline, and antidepressants. These medications are widely available worldwide, generally tolerable and could be considered for an off-label, time-limited trial for a predesignated period of time, after which a decision to switch or stay can be made based on clinical response. Among investigational medications, NMDAR agonists, muscarinic agonists, and LB-102 remain under study. Suggestions for future research include reducing placebo effects by designing studies with a smaller number of high-quality study sites, potentially increasing the use of more precise rating scales for negative symptoms, and focused studies in people with predominant negative symptoms.

Background: Raynaud syndrome (RS) is a peripheral vasculopathy characterised be impaired acral perfusion typically manifesting as skin discolouration with pallor, cyanosis and/or erythema, and increased sensitivity to cold. RS may be primary or secondary to systemic disease, lifestyle and environmental factors or medication. RS has been reported with medication to treat ADHD, but we found no recent comprehensive overview of the literature. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence in the published literature for Raynaud syndrome associated with medication for ADHD.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase from inception to 12 June 2024 for articles published in English describing cases of RS in individuals treated with stimulant medication, atomoxetine, guanfacine or clonidine. Identified cases were assessed against the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Scale criteria to determine the probability of a causal relationship with the medication.

Results: The initial search identified 197 articles. A total of 61 cases were identified from 15 case reports, 5 case series, 1 retrospective case-control study, and 1 retrospective cohort study. No randomised, controlled studies were identified. Implicated medications included methylphenidate, (dex)amfetamine and, more rarely, atomoxetine. Most cases were mild and resolved within weeks of discontinuation, dose reduction or switch to an alternative medication. A few cases associated with systemic disease were reported, leading to ulceration, gangrene and the need for amputation or revascularisation in some individuals. Assessment of 28 cases using the Naranjo criteria suggested a 'possible' causative role of ADHD medication in 13 cases, a 'probable' role in 13 cases and a 'definite' role in two cases.

Conclusions: Due to the uncontrolled nature of all but one of the available studies, a causal relationship between medication for ADHD and RS could not be determined reliably. However, in view of the possibility of severe sequelae, albeit in rare cases, routine monitoring for signs of RS is recommended in individuals treated with CNS stimulants or atomoxetine, especially when initiating treatment or increasing the dose. Large database studies in which individuals act as their own controls should be conducted to clarify any association between treatment with these medications and RS, controlling for confounding factors.

Background: A growing body of evidence supports the effectiveness of cenobamate (CNB). This study aimed to assess the clinical response to add-on CNB through a time-to-event approach and explore the potential contribution of the concomitant classes of antiseizure medications (ASMs) to improve CNB clinical use.

Patients and methods: This study is a subgroup analysis of a larger retrospective, multicenter study on adults with focal-onset seizures participating in the Italian Expanded Access Program at five pre-established centers. The primary endpoint was the time-to-baseline seizure count; secondary endpoints included the rates of seizure response, seizure freedom (defined as no seizures' occurrence since at least the previous follow-up visit), treatment discontinuation, and adverse events (AEs).

Results: Data on 92 participants were extracted, with a median age of 44 (first quartile (Q₁)-third quartile (Q₃): 29.25-50.75) years. The number of seizures recorded during the 90-day baseline was reached by 59/92 (64.1%) subjects during the 12-month follow-up. A higher, but not statistically significant probability of reaching the baseline seizures count was shown in the subgroups of subjects taking CNB with sodium channel blockers (SCBs) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-9.61, p = 0.112) and both SCBs and GABAergics (HR 1.48; 95% CI 0.43-5.09, p = 0.536) compared with subjects taking GABAergics without SCBs. At 12 months, the rates of seizure response, seizure-freedom, and treatment discontinuation were 42.0%, 13.6%, and 23.9%, respectively. A total of 47/92 (51.1%) subjects experienced AEs (mainly somnolence, dizziness, and balance disorders) at a median time of 61 (Q₁-Q₃: 30-101) days. There was a higher, but not statistically significant risk of AEs occurrence in subjects treated with both SCBs and GABAergics and in those taking SCBs without GABAergics (HR 2.24; 95% CI 0.51-9.82, p = 0.286 and HR 1.40; 95% CI 0.31-6.39, p = 0.661, respectively) compared with those taking GABAergics without SCBs. The main limitations are the retrospective design and the small sample size.

Conclusions: This time-to-event analysis added new insights to the currently available evidence about the real-world effectiveness of add-on CNB. Explorative estimates suggested favorable trends for subjects treated with concomitant GABAergics and without SCBs, who seemed to reach baseline seizure count and experience AEs less frequently and later than subjects treated with other concomitant ASMs. Further studies are needed to identify the best combinations of CNB with other ASMs to maximize seizure control and tolerability.