Basma Ehab Amer, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Abdullah Ashraf Hamad, Kerollos Abdelsayed, Ahmed Elaraby, Ahmed Mohamed Abozaid, Mohamed Abd-ElGawad
{"title":"二甲双胍加生活方式干预与单纯生活方式干预在延缓或预防糖尿病前期患者 2 型糖尿病方面的比较:随机对照试验荟萃分析。","authors":"Basma Ehab Amer, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Abdullah Ashraf Hamad, Kerollos Abdelsayed, Ahmed Elaraby, Ahmed Mohamed Abozaid, Mohamed Abd-ElGawad","doi":"10.1186/s13098-024-01504-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of adding metformin to lifestyle interventions versus lifestyle interventions alone in individuals with prediabetes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched four databases from inception until March 20, 2024. Our primary outcomes included the incidence of type 2 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, plasma lipids, and weight measurements. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as the risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), while continuous outcomes were pooled as the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% CI in the random effect model. All statistical analyses were conducted using the \"meta\" package of RStudio software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 12 RCTs, comprising 2720 patients. Adding metformin to lifestyle interventions significantly reduced HbA1c levels (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI [-0.19, -0.01], P = 0.03) and the incidence of type 2 diabetes (RR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.75, 0.97], P = 0.01). Interestingly, adding metformin to lifestyle interventions was comparable to lifestyle interventions alone in terms of FPG at both 3 and 6 months; however, it significantly reduced FPG at 12 months (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.08], P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of all secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that adding metformin to lifestyle interventions may improve glycemic control in individuals with prediabetes and reduce their risk of progression to diabetes, compared to lifestyle interventions alone. A longer duration of this combined approach may be required to observe the desired effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"16 1","pages":"273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metformin plus lifestyle interventions versus lifestyle interventions alone for the delay or prevention of type 2 diabetes in individuals with prediabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Basma Ehab Amer, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Abdullah Ashraf Hamad, Kerollos Abdelsayed, Ahmed Elaraby, Ahmed Mohamed Abozaid, Mohamed Abd-ElGawad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13098-024-01504-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of adding metformin to lifestyle interventions versus lifestyle interventions alone in individuals with prediabetes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched four databases from inception until March 20, 2024. Our primary outcomes included the incidence of type 2 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, plasma lipids, and weight measurements. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as the risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), while continuous outcomes were pooled as the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% CI in the random effect model. All statistical analyses were conducted using the \\\"meta\\\" package of RStudio software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 12 RCTs, comprising 2720 patients. Adding metformin to lifestyle interventions significantly reduced HbA1c levels (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI [-0.19, -0.01], P = 0.03) and the incidence of type 2 diabetes (RR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.75, 0.97], P = 0.01). Interestingly, adding metformin to lifestyle interventions was comparable to lifestyle interventions alone in terms of FPG at both 3 and 6 months; however, it significantly reduced FPG at 12 months (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.08], P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of all secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that adding metformin to lifestyle interventions may improve glycemic control in individuals with prediabetes and reduce their risk of progression to diabetes, compared to lifestyle interventions alone. A longer duration of this combined approach may be required to observe the desired effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562588/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01504-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01504-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metformin plus lifestyle interventions versus lifestyle interventions alone for the delay or prevention of type 2 diabetes in individuals with prediabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Objectives: We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of adding metformin to lifestyle interventions versus lifestyle interventions alone in individuals with prediabetes.
Materials and methods: We searched four databases from inception until March 20, 2024. Our primary outcomes included the incidence of type 2 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, plasma lipids, and weight measurements. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as the risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), while continuous outcomes were pooled as the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% CI in the random effect model. All statistical analyses were conducted using the "meta" package of RStudio software.
Results: We included 12 RCTs, comprising 2720 patients. Adding metformin to lifestyle interventions significantly reduced HbA1c levels (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI [-0.19, -0.01], P = 0.03) and the incidence of type 2 diabetes (RR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.75, 0.97], P = 0.01). Interestingly, adding metformin to lifestyle interventions was comparable to lifestyle interventions alone in terms of FPG at both 3 and 6 months; however, it significantly reduced FPG at 12 months (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.08], P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of all secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that adding metformin to lifestyle interventions may improve glycemic control in individuals with prediabetes and reduce their risk of progression to diabetes, compared to lifestyle interventions alone. A longer duration of this combined approach may be required to observe the desired effects.
期刊介绍:
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.