早期连续血糖监测得出的血糖模式与随后的胰岛素抵抗和孕期妊娠糖尿病的发生有关。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s13098-024-01508-4
Chee Wai Ku, Ruther Teo Zheng, Hong Ying Tan, Jamie Yong Qi Lim, Ling-Wei Chen, Yin Bun Cheung, Keith M Godfrey, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Fabian Yap, Ngee Lek, See Ling Loy
{"title":"早期连续血糖监测得出的血糖模式与随后的胰岛素抵抗和孕期妊娠糖尿病的发生有关。","authors":"Chee Wai Ku, Ruther Teo Zheng, Hong Ying Tan, Jamie Yong Qi Lim, Ling-Wei Chen, Yin Bun Cheung, Keith M Godfrey, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Fabian Yap, Ngee Lek, See Ling Loy","doi":"10.1186/s13098-024-01508-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and insulin resistance (IR) increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to examine the relationship of interstitial glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) at early gestation, and the subsequent development of IR and GDM, and to determine 24-h interstitial glucose centile distributions in women with normal (non-IR and non-GDM) and suboptimal glycemic status (IR and/or GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CGM measurements were taken for 3-10 days at 18-24 weeks' gestation, followed by fasting serum insulin and oral glucose tolerance testing at 24-28 weeks' gestation. IR and GDM were determined by the updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR score of ≥ 1.22 and 2013 World Health Organization criteria, respectively. Risks of IR and GDM were estimated using modified Poisson models, and hourly interstitial glucose centiles determined using Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This prospective cohort study involved 167 pregnant women in Singapore, with a mean age of 31.7 years, body mass index of 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and gestation of 20.3 weeks. 25% of women exhibited IR and 18% developed GDM. After confounders adjustment, women with suboptimal glycemic control, indicated by higher mean daily glucose (risk ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.16, 1.73), glucose management indicator (1.08; 1.03, 1.12), and J-index (1.04; 1.02, 1.06), as well as those with greater glycemic variability, indicated by higher standard deviation (1.69; 1.37, 2.09), coefficient of variation (1.03; 1.00, 1.06), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (1.4; 1.14, 1.35) derived from CGM in early gestation were associated with higher risks of developing IR in later gestation. These associations were similarly observed for the development of GDM. Centile curves showed that, compared to those with normal glycemic status, women with suboptimal glycemic status had higher glucose levels, with greater fluctuations throughout 24 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In pregnant women who subsequently developed IR and GDM, interstitial glucose levels assessed by CGM were elevated and varied greatly. This supports the potential use of CGM to screen for glycemic changes early in pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"16 1","pages":"271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic patterns are associated with subsequent insulin resistance and gestational diabetes mellitus development during pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Chee Wai Ku, Ruther Teo Zheng, Hong Ying Tan, Jamie Yong Qi Lim, Ling-Wei Chen, Yin Bun Cheung, Keith M Godfrey, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Fabian Yap, Ngee Lek, See Ling Loy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13098-024-01508-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and insulin resistance (IR) increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to examine the relationship of interstitial glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) at early gestation, and the subsequent development of IR and GDM, and to determine 24-h interstitial glucose centile distributions in women with normal (non-IR and non-GDM) and suboptimal glycemic status (IR and/or GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CGM measurements were taken for 3-10 days at 18-24 weeks' gestation, followed by fasting serum insulin and oral glucose tolerance testing at 24-28 weeks' gestation. IR and GDM were determined by the updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR score of ≥ 1.22 and 2013 World Health Organization criteria, respectively. Risks of IR and GDM were estimated using modified Poisson models, and hourly interstitial glucose centiles determined using Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This prospective cohort study involved 167 pregnant women in Singapore, with a mean age of 31.7 years, body mass index of 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and gestation of 20.3 weeks. 25% of women exhibited IR and 18% developed GDM. After confounders adjustment, women with suboptimal glycemic control, indicated by higher mean daily glucose (risk ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.16, 1.73), glucose management indicator (1.08; 1.03, 1.12), and J-index (1.04; 1.02, 1.06), as well as those with greater glycemic variability, indicated by higher standard deviation (1.69; 1.37, 2.09), coefficient of variation (1.03; 1.00, 1.06), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (1.4; 1.14, 1.35) derived from CGM in early gestation were associated with higher risks of developing IR in later gestation. These associations were similarly observed for the development of GDM. Centile curves showed that, compared to those with normal glycemic status, women with suboptimal glycemic status had higher glucose levels, with greater fluctuations throughout 24 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In pregnant women who subsequently developed IR and GDM, interstitial glucose levels assessed by CGM were elevated and varied greatly. This supports the potential use of CGM to screen for glycemic changes early in pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01508-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01508-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠糖尿病(GDM)和胰岛素抵抗(IR)会增加不良妊娠结局的风险。我们旨在研究妊娠早期通过连续血糖监测(CGM)评估的间质葡萄糖与随后发生的 IR 和 GDM 之间的关系,并确定血糖状态正常(非 IR 和非 GDM)和血糖状态不达标(IR 和/或 GDM)妇女的 24 小时间质葡萄糖百分位数分布:在妊娠 18-24 周时进行为期 3-10 天的 CGM 测量,然后在妊娠 24-28 周时进行空腹血清胰岛素和口服葡萄糖耐量试验。IR和GDM分别根据更新的体内平衡模型评估IR评分≥1.22和2013年世界卫生组织标准确定。采用改良泊松模型估计IR和GDM的风险,并采用位置、规模和形状的广义加性模型确定每小时间质葡萄糖百分位数:这项前瞻性队列研究涉及新加坡的 167 名孕妇,她们的平均年龄为 31.7 岁,体重指数为 22.9 kg/m2,妊娠期为 20.3 周。25%的孕妇表现为IR,18%的孕妇出现了GDM。在对混杂因素进行调整后,血糖控制不理想的妇女(表现为较高的日平均血糖(风险比 1.42;95% 置信区间 1.16,1.73)、血糖管理指标(1.08;1.03,1.12)和 J 指数(1.04;1.02,1.在妊娠早期,血糖管理指标(1.08;1.03,1.12)和 J 指数(1.04;1.02,1.06)显示血糖变异性较大,标准偏差(1.69;1.37,2.09)、变异系数(1.03;1.00,1.06)和血糖偏移平均振幅(1.4;1.14,1.35)较高。在 GDM 的发生方面也观察到了类似的关联。百分位曲线显示,与血糖状态正常的孕妇相比,血糖状态不达标的孕妇血糖水平更高,且在 24 小时内波动更大:结论:在随后发展为 IR 和 GDM 的孕妇中,CGM 评估的间质葡萄糖水平升高且变化很大。这支持了使用 CGM 筛查妊娠早期血糖变化的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic patterns are associated with subsequent insulin resistance and gestational diabetes mellitus development during pregnancy.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and insulin resistance (IR) increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to examine the relationship of interstitial glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) at early gestation, and the subsequent development of IR and GDM, and to determine 24-h interstitial glucose centile distributions in women with normal (non-IR and non-GDM) and suboptimal glycemic status (IR and/or GDM).

Methods: CGM measurements were taken for 3-10 days at 18-24 weeks' gestation, followed by fasting serum insulin and oral glucose tolerance testing at 24-28 weeks' gestation. IR and GDM were determined by the updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR score of ≥ 1.22 and 2013 World Health Organization criteria, respectively. Risks of IR and GDM were estimated using modified Poisson models, and hourly interstitial glucose centiles determined using Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape.

Results: This prospective cohort study involved 167 pregnant women in Singapore, with a mean age of 31.7 years, body mass index of 22.9 kg/m2, and gestation of 20.3 weeks. 25% of women exhibited IR and 18% developed GDM. After confounders adjustment, women with suboptimal glycemic control, indicated by higher mean daily glucose (risk ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.16, 1.73), glucose management indicator (1.08; 1.03, 1.12), and J-index (1.04; 1.02, 1.06), as well as those with greater glycemic variability, indicated by higher standard deviation (1.69; 1.37, 2.09), coefficient of variation (1.03; 1.00, 1.06), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (1.4; 1.14, 1.35) derived from CGM in early gestation were associated with higher risks of developing IR in later gestation. These associations were similarly observed for the development of GDM. Centile curves showed that, compared to those with normal glycemic status, women with suboptimal glycemic status had higher glucose levels, with greater fluctuations throughout 24 h.

Conclusions: In pregnant women who subsequently developed IR and GDM, interstitial glucose levels assessed by CGM were elevated and varied greatly. This supports the potential use of CGM to screen for glycemic changes early in pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
期刊最新文献
C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index predicts stroke incidence in a hypertensive population: a national cohort study. Investigation of renal tubular function with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus during diabetic ketoacidosis. Preclinical evidence and possible mechanisms of cardioprotective effects of resveratrol in diabetic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metformin plus lifestyle interventions versus lifestyle interventions alone for the delay or prevention of type 2 diabetes in individuals with prediabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Early continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic patterns are associated with subsequent insulin resistance and gestational diabetes mellitus development during pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1