{"title":"基于美国 SEER 数据库和中国单一机构登记的鼻咽癌流行区和非流行区的性别生存率。","authors":"Lin-Feng Guo, Ya-Qing Dai, Yi-Feng Yu, San-Gang Wu","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S490023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prognostic implications of gender in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) utilizing data from two independent cohorts: the Xiamen (XM)-NPC cohort (an endemic area in China) and the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-NPC cohort (a non-endemic area).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients diagnosed with NPC from both the XM-NPC and SEER-NPC cohorts. Statistical analysis involved the chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified 728 patients in the XM-NPC cohort and 2237 in the SEER cohort. In the XM-NPC cohort, 515 (70.7%) were male and 213 (29.3%) were female. In the SEER-NPC cohort, 1597 (71.4%) were male and 640 (28.6%) were female. The male-to-female ratio peaked at ≤25 years (2.33) and 46-55 years (2.79) in the XM-NPC cohort, and at ≤25 years (2.07) and 56-65 years (3.24) in the SEER-NPC cohort. The lowest ratios were observed among patients aged 26-35 years in both cohorts (XM-NPC: 1.64; SEER-NPC:1.38). In the XM-NPC cohort, females had significantly better overall survival (P=0.022) and distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.038) compared to males. Similarly, in the SEER-NPC cohort, gender was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, with females showing better outcomes (P=0.038). Consistent trends were observed in patients aged >45 years in both cohorts, while survival outcomes were comparable between genders in patients aged ≤45 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender independently influences survival outcomes of NPC in both endemic and non-endemic areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"769-782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-Specific Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Endemic and Non-Endemic Areas Based on the US SEER Database and a Chinese Single-Institutional Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Lin-Feng Guo, Ya-Qing Dai, Yi-Feng Yu, San-Gang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CLEP.S490023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prognostic implications of gender in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) utilizing data from two independent cohorts: the Xiamen (XM)-NPC cohort (an endemic area in China) and the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-NPC cohort (a non-endemic area).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients diagnosed with NPC from both the XM-NPC and SEER-NPC cohorts. Statistical analysis involved the chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified 728 patients in the XM-NPC cohort and 2237 in the SEER cohort. In the XM-NPC cohort, 515 (70.7%) were male and 213 (29.3%) were female. In the SEER-NPC cohort, 1597 (71.4%) were male and 640 (28.6%) were female. The male-to-female ratio peaked at ≤25 years (2.33) and 46-55 years (2.79) in the XM-NPC cohort, and at ≤25 years (2.07) and 56-65 years (3.24) in the SEER-NPC cohort. The lowest ratios were observed among patients aged 26-35 years in both cohorts (XM-NPC: 1.64; SEER-NPC:1.38). In the XM-NPC cohort, females had significantly better overall survival (P=0.022) and distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.038) compared to males. Similarly, in the SEER-NPC cohort, gender was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, with females showing better outcomes (P=0.038). Consistent trends were observed in patients aged >45 years in both cohorts, while survival outcomes were comparable between genders in patients aged ≤45 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender independently influences survival outcomes of NPC in both endemic and non-endemic areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"769-782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559420/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S490023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S490023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender-Specific Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Endemic and Non-Endemic Areas Based on the US SEER Database and a Chinese Single-Institutional Registry.
Purpose: To investigate the prognostic implications of gender in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) utilizing data from two independent cohorts: the Xiamen (XM)-NPC cohort (an endemic area in China) and the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-NPC cohort (a non-endemic area).
Methods: We included patients diagnosed with NPC from both the XM-NPC and SEER-NPC cohorts. Statistical analysis involved the chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox regression analyses.
Results: The study identified 728 patients in the XM-NPC cohort and 2237 in the SEER cohort. In the XM-NPC cohort, 515 (70.7%) were male and 213 (29.3%) were female. In the SEER-NPC cohort, 1597 (71.4%) were male and 640 (28.6%) were female. The male-to-female ratio peaked at ≤25 years (2.33) and 46-55 years (2.79) in the XM-NPC cohort, and at ≤25 years (2.07) and 56-65 years (3.24) in the SEER-NPC cohort. The lowest ratios were observed among patients aged 26-35 years in both cohorts (XM-NPC: 1.64; SEER-NPC:1.38). In the XM-NPC cohort, females had significantly better overall survival (P=0.022) and distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.038) compared to males. Similarly, in the SEER-NPC cohort, gender was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, with females showing better outcomes (P=0.038). Consistent trends were observed in patients aged >45 years in both cohorts, while survival outcomes were comparable between genders in patients aged ≤45 years.
Conclusion: Gender independently influences survival outcomes of NPC in both endemic and non-endemic areas.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews.
Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews.
When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes.
The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.