尼日利亚临床试验的挑战和前景--世界卫生组织 COVID-19 团结加试验的经验教训。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107743
Adefolarin Opawoye , Vivian Kwaghe , Zaiyad G. Habib , Yusuf Jibrin , Ibrahim Maigari , Bashir Hussaini , Olukemi Adekanmbi , Uche Unigwe , Olusola Ayoola , Akin Osibogun , Kolawole Salami , Marie-Pierre Preziosi , Abdulrazaq G. Habib
{"title":"尼日利亚临床试验的挑战和前景--世界卫生组织 COVID-19 团结加试验的经验教训。","authors":"Adefolarin Opawoye ,&nbsp;Vivian Kwaghe ,&nbsp;Zaiyad G. Habib ,&nbsp;Yusuf Jibrin ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Maigari ,&nbsp;Bashir Hussaini ,&nbsp;Olukemi Adekanmbi ,&nbsp;Uche Unigwe ,&nbsp;Olusola Ayoola ,&nbsp;Akin Osibogun ,&nbsp;Kolawole Salami ,&nbsp;Marie-Pierre Preziosi ,&nbsp;Abdulrazaq G. Habib","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conducting randomized clinical trials (RCTs) during a pandemic is essential for obtaining timely evidence on safe and effective treatments, but it presents numerous obstacles. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) sponsored multinational RCTs investigating repurposed drugs among hospitalized COVID-19 patients across countries with varying clinical research capacities. In Nigeria, several challenges hindered our progress, including inadequate infrastructure, initial insufficient investigator certification and expertise, and delays in securing regulatory approvals due to bureaucratic hurdles. Despite these challenges, the WHO-sponsored Solidarity Plus Trial (SPT) offered valuable opportunities to enhance research capacity, streamline participant enrolment through electronic randomization, and bolster infection prevention and control measures for healthcare workers. Moreover, the trial enabled us to upgrade infrastructure at multiple sites, facilitating improved case detection through more testing and data collection. A crucial lesson learned was the importance of expediting trial initiation to capitalize on the limited window for data collection during an outbreak. To optimize RCTs during pandemics, we advocate for enhanced community engagement, collaborative efforts across sectors, strengthened research capacity, flexible regulatory frameworks, and the establishment of adaptive clinical trial units. By addressing these challenges and leveraging opportunities, we can significantly enhance the efficiency and impact of RCTs during public health emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and prospects of clinical trials in Nigeria - Lessons from the WHO COVID-19 solidarity plus trial\",\"authors\":\"Adefolarin Opawoye ,&nbsp;Vivian Kwaghe ,&nbsp;Zaiyad G. Habib ,&nbsp;Yusuf Jibrin ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Maigari ,&nbsp;Bashir Hussaini ,&nbsp;Olukemi Adekanmbi ,&nbsp;Uche Unigwe ,&nbsp;Olusola Ayoola ,&nbsp;Akin Osibogun ,&nbsp;Kolawole Salami ,&nbsp;Marie-Pierre Preziosi ,&nbsp;Abdulrazaq G. Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Conducting randomized clinical trials (RCTs) during a pandemic is essential for obtaining timely evidence on safe and effective treatments, but it presents numerous obstacles. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) sponsored multinational RCTs investigating repurposed drugs among hospitalized COVID-19 patients across countries with varying clinical research capacities. In Nigeria, several challenges hindered our progress, including inadequate infrastructure, initial insufficient investigator certification and expertise, and delays in securing regulatory approvals due to bureaucratic hurdles. Despite these challenges, the WHO-sponsored Solidarity Plus Trial (SPT) offered valuable opportunities to enhance research capacity, streamline participant enrolment through electronic randomization, and bolster infection prevention and control measures for healthcare workers. Moreover, the trial enabled us to upgrade infrastructure at multiple sites, facilitating improved case detection through more testing and data collection. A crucial lesson learned was the importance of expediting trial initiation to capitalize on the limited window for data collection during an outbreak. To optimize RCTs during pandemics, we advocate for enhanced community engagement, collaborative efforts across sectors, strengthened research capacity, flexible regulatory frameworks, and the establishment of adaptive clinical trial units. By addressing these challenges and leveraging opportunities, we can significantly enhance the efficiency and impact of RCTs during public health emergencies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003264\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大流行期间开展随机临床试验(RCT)对于及时获得安全有效的治疗证据至关重要,但也存在诸多障碍。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,世界卫生组织(WHO)赞助了多国 RCT,在临床研究能力各不相同的国家对 COVID-19 住院患者中的再利用药物进行调查。在尼日利亚,有几项挑战阻碍了我们的进展,包括基础设施不足、最初的研究人员认证和专业知识不足,以及由于官僚主义障碍而导致的监管审批延误。尽管存在这些挑战,但世界卫生组织赞助的 "团结加试验"(SPT)为我们提供了宝贵的机会,使我们能够提高研究能力,通过电子随机化简化参与者注册程序,并加强医护人员的感染预防和控制措施。此外,该试验还使我们能够升级多个地点的基础设施,通过更多的检测和数据收集来改进病例检测。我们学到的一个重要经验是,在疫情爆发期间,必须加快试验的启动,以充分利用有限的数据收集时间。为了优化大流行期间的临床试验,我们主张加强社区参与、跨部门合作、加强研究能力、灵活的监管框架以及建立适应性临床试验单位。通过应对这些挑战和利用各种机遇,我们可以大大提高公共卫生突发事件期间 RCT 的效率和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges and prospects of clinical trials in Nigeria - Lessons from the WHO COVID-19 solidarity plus trial
Conducting randomized clinical trials (RCTs) during a pandemic is essential for obtaining timely evidence on safe and effective treatments, but it presents numerous obstacles. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) sponsored multinational RCTs investigating repurposed drugs among hospitalized COVID-19 patients across countries with varying clinical research capacities. In Nigeria, several challenges hindered our progress, including inadequate infrastructure, initial insufficient investigator certification and expertise, and delays in securing regulatory approvals due to bureaucratic hurdles. Despite these challenges, the WHO-sponsored Solidarity Plus Trial (SPT) offered valuable opportunities to enhance research capacity, streamline participant enrolment through electronic randomization, and bolster infection prevention and control measures for healthcare workers. Moreover, the trial enabled us to upgrade infrastructure at multiple sites, facilitating improved case detection through more testing and data collection. A crucial lesson learned was the importance of expediting trial initiation to capitalize on the limited window for data collection during an outbreak. To optimize RCTs during pandemics, we advocate for enhanced community engagement, collaborative efforts across sectors, strengthened research capacity, flexible regulatory frameworks, and the establishment of adaptive clinical trial units. By addressing these challenges and leveraging opportunities, we can significantly enhance the efficiency and impact of RCTs during public health emergencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Integrative data analysis of clinical trials network studies to examine the impact of psychosocial treatments for Black people who use cocaine: Study protocol' [Contemporary Clinical Trials 133 (2023) 107329]. A new way to address missing data in late-stage clinical trials. A peer support intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP randomized pilot trial design and methods outline. An evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) in a youth outpatient eating disorders service: A protocol paper. Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1