在随后的模拟消防员职业任务中,急性运动会影响心率变异性,但不会影响认知灵活性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05650-9
Philip J Agostinelli, Nicholas C Bordonie, Braxton A Linder, Ann M Robbins, Parker L Jones, Lee F Reagan, C Brooks Mobley, Matthew W Miller, William M Murrah, JoEllen M Sefton
{"title":"在随后的模拟消防员职业任务中,急性运动会影响心率变异性,但不会影响认知灵活性。","authors":"Philip J Agostinelli, Nicholas C Bordonie, Braxton A Linder, Ann M Robbins, Parker L Jones, Lee F Reagan, C Brooks Mobley, Matthew W Miller, William M Murrah, JoEllen M Sefton","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05650-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute exercise can transiently enhance cognitive flexibility. The cognitive demand of firefighters makes it relevant to understand if on-shift exercise could produce similar improvements in cognitive performance during subsequent occupational tasks. Metrics of heart rate variability (HRV), such as time- and frequency-domain outcomes, may shed light upon the influence exercise has on cognition, as they discern information related to cardiac autonomic (sympathetic/parasympathetic) function. We aimed to determine if acute resistance and aerobic exercise impact cognitive flexibility during occupational tasks and its relation to HRV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>32 participants completed a baseline Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) and three experimental trials: resistance exercise (RE), aerobic exercise (AE), or a rested control (CON). An occupational task assessment (OTA) including four rounds of 10 deadlifts and a 0.15-mile sandbag carry in an environmental chamber (35 °C/50% humidity) was completed after each trial. The second round was followed by the WCST. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyze differences by condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the WCST, total, perseverative, and non-perseverative errors did not differ (ps > 0.39). Time-domain HRV metrics were not different (ps > 0.05). All frequency-domain metrics, other than low-frequency power, were not different (ps > 0.24). Low-frequency power was lower based on condition (p = 0.03). Post hoc analysis showed low-frequency power was lower following AE compared to RE and CON.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest an acute bout of on-shift aerobic or resistance exercise may not impact cognitive flexibility during subsequent simulated occupational tasks, despite depressed metrics of heart rate variability following aerobic exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute exercise impacts heart rate variability but not cognitive flexibility during subsequent simulated firefighter occupational tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Philip J Agostinelli, Nicholas C Bordonie, Braxton A Linder, Ann M Robbins, Parker L Jones, Lee F Reagan, C Brooks Mobley, Matthew W Miller, William M Murrah, JoEllen M Sefton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05650-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute exercise can transiently enhance cognitive flexibility. The cognitive demand of firefighters makes it relevant to understand if on-shift exercise could produce similar improvements in cognitive performance during subsequent occupational tasks. Metrics of heart rate variability (HRV), such as time- and frequency-domain outcomes, may shed light upon the influence exercise has on cognition, as they discern information related to cardiac autonomic (sympathetic/parasympathetic) function. We aimed to determine if acute resistance and aerobic exercise impact cognitive flexibility during occupational tasks and its relation to HRV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>32 participants completed a baseline Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) and three experimental trials: resistance exercise (RE), aerobic exercise (AE), or a rested control (CON). An occupational task assessment (OTA) including four rounds of 10 deadlifts and a 0.15-mile sandbag carry in an environmental chamber (35 °C/50% humidity) was completed after each trial. The second round was followed by the WCST. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyze differences by condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the WCST, total, perseverative, and non-perseverative errors did not differ (ps > 0.39). Time-domain HRV metrics were not different (ps > 0.05). All frequency-domain metrics, other than low-frequency power, were not different (ps > 0.24). Low-frequency power was lower based on condition (p = 0.03). Post hoc analysis showed low-frequency power was lower following AE compared to RE and CON.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest an acute bout of on-shift aerobic or resistance exercise may not impact cognitive flexibility during subsequent simulated occupational tasks, despite depressed metrics of heart rate variability following aerobic exercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05650-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05650-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性锻炼可短暂提高认知灵活性。消防员对认知能力的要求很高,因此有必要了解轮班锻炼能否在随后的职业任务中对认知能力产生类似的改善。心率变异性(HRV)的指标,如时域和频域结果,可揭示运动对认知的影响,因为它们能辨别与心脏自律神经(交感/副交感神经)功能有关的信息。我们旨在确定急性阻力运动和有氧运动是否会影响职业任务中的认知灵活性及其与心率变异的关系。方法:32 名参与者完成了基线威斯康星卡片分类任务(WCST)和三项实验:阻力运动(RE)、有氧运动(AE)或休息对照(CON)。每次试验后都要进行职业任务评估(OTA),包括在环境试验室(35 °C/50%湿度)中进行四轮10次负重举重和0.15英里沙袋搬运。第二轮后进行 WCST。重复测量方差分析用于分析不同条件下的差异:在 WCST 中,总错误、持久性错误和非持久性错误没有差异(PS > 0.39)。时域心率变异指标没有差异(PS > 0.05)。除低频功率外,所有频域指标均无差异(PS > 0.24)。低频功率因条件不同而降低(P = 0.03)。事后分析表明,与 RE 和 CON 相比,AE 的低频功率更低:结果表明,尽管有氧运动后心率变异性指标下降,但急性轮班有氧或阻力运动可能不会影响后续模拟职业任务中的认知灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute exercise impacts heart rate variability but not cognitive flexibility during subsequent simulated firefighter occupational tasks.

Purpose: Acute exercise can transiently enhance cognitive flexibility. The cognitive demand of firefighters makes it relevant to understand if on-shift exercise could produce similar improvements in cognitive performance during subsequent occupational tasks. Metrics of heart rate variability (HRV), such as time- and frequency-domain outcomes, may shed light upon the influence exercise has on cognition, as they discern information related to cardiac autonomic (sympathetic/parasympathetic) function. We aimed to determine if acute resistance and aerobic exercise impact cognitive flexibility during occupational tasks and its relation to HRV.

Methods: 32 participants completed a baseline Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) and three experimental trials: resistance exercise (RE), aerobic exercise (AE), or a rested control (CON). An occupational task assessment (OTA) including four rounds of 10 deadlifts and a 0.15-mile sandbag carry in an environmental chamber (35 °C/50% humidity) was completed after each trial. The second round was followed by the WCST. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyze differences by condition.

Results: For the WCST, total, perseverative, and non-perseverative errors did not differ (ps > 0.39). Time-domain HRV metrics were not different (ps > 0.05). All frequency-domain metrics, other than low-frequency power, were not different (ps > 0.24). Low-frequency power was lower based on condition (p = 0.03). Post hoc analysis showed low-frequency power was lower following AE compared to RE and CON.

Conclusion: Results suggest an acute bout of on-shift aerobic or resistance exercise may not impact cognitive flexibility during subsequent simulated occupational tasks, despite depressed metrics of heart rate variability following aerobic exercise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
期刊最新文献
Resigning as editors in chief. Effect of experimental knee pain location on gait kinematics. Acute exercise impacts heart rate variability but not cognitive flexibility during subsequent simulated firefighter occupational tasks. Response to: methodological considerations for assessing SmO2 reproducibility and its applications in sport sciences. Methodological considerations for assessing SmO2 reproducibility and its applications in sports sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1