动态多感官整合揭示了伸手过程中紧迫性和证据积累的不同影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES eNeuro Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0262-24.2024
Anne H Hoffmann, Frédéric Crevecoeur
{"title":"动态多感官整合揭示了伸手过程中紧迫性和证据积累的不同影响。","authors":"Anne H Hoffmann, Frédéric Crevecoeur","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0262-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When making perceptual decisions, humans combine information across sensory modalities dependent on their respective uncertainties. However, it remains unknown how the brain integrates multisensory feedback during movement, and which factors besides sensory uncertainty influence sensory contributions. We performed two reaching experiments on healthy adults to investigate whether movement corrections to combined visual and mechanical perturbations scale with visual uncertainty. To describe the dynamics of multimodal feedback responses, we further varied movement time and visual feedback duration during the movement. The results of our first experiment show that the contribution of visual feedback decreased with uncertainty. Additionally, we observed a transient phase during which visual feedback responses were stronger during faster movements. In a follow-up experiment, we found that the contribution of vision increased more quickly during slow movements when we presented the visual feedback for a longer time. Muscle activity corresponding to these visual responses exhibited modulations with sensory uncertainty and movement speed ca. 100ms following the onset of the visual feedback. Using an optimal feedback control model, we show that the increased response to visual feedback during fast movements can be explained by an urgency-dependent increase in control gains. Further, the fact that a longer viewing duration increased the visual contributions suggests that the brain accumulates sensory information over time to estimate the state of the arm during reaching. Our results provide additional evidence concerning the link between reaching control and decision-making, both of which appear to be influenced by sensory evidence accumulation and response urgency.<b>Significance statement</b> The time-course of multisensory integration during movement, along with the factors influencing this process, still requires further investigation. Here, we tested how visual uncertainty, movement speed, and visual feedback duration influence reach corrections to combined visual and mechanical perturbations. Using an optimal feedback control model, we illustrate that the time-course of multimodal corrections follows the predictions of a Kalman filter which continuously weighs sensory feedback and internal predictions according to their reliability. Importantly, we further show that changes in movement speed led to urgency-dependent modulations of control gains. Our results corroborate previous research linking motor control and decision-making by highlighting that multisensory feedback responses depend on sensory evidence accumulation and response urgency in a similar way as decision-making processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissociable effects of urgency and evidence accumulation during reaching revealed by dynamic multisensory integration.\",\"authors\":\"Anne H Hoffmann, Frédéric Crevecoeur\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0262-24.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When making perceptual decisions, humans combine information across sensory modalities dependent on their respective uncertainties. However, it remains unknown how the brain integrates multisensory feedback during movement, and which factors besides sensory uncertainty influence sensory contributions. We performed two reaching experiments on healthy adults to investigate whether movement corrections to combined visual and mechanical perturbations scale with visual uncertainty. To describe the dynamics of multimodal feedback responses, we further varied movement time and visual feedback duration during the movement. The results of our first experiment show that the contribution of visual feedback decreased with uncertainty. Additionally, we observed a transient phase during which visual feedback responses were stronger during faster movements. In a follow-up experiment, we found that the contribution of vision increased more quickly during slow movements when we presented the visual feedback for a longer time. Muscle activity corresponding to these visual responses exhibited modulations with sensory uncertainty and movement speed ca. 100ms following the onset of the visual feedback. Using an optimal feedback control model, we show that the increased response to visual feedback during fast movements can be explained by an urgency-dependent increase in control gains. Further, the fact that a longer viewing duration increased the visual contributions suggests that the brain accumulates sensory information over time to estimate the state of the arm during reaching. Our results provide additional evidence concerning the link between reaching control and decision-making, both of which appear to be influenced by sensory evidence accumulation and response urgency.<b>Significance statement</b> The time-course of multisensory integration during movement, along with the factors influencing this process, still requires further investigation. Here, we tested how visual uncertainty, movement speed, and visual feedback duration influence reach corrections to combined visual and mechanical perturbations. Using an optimal feedback control model, we illustrate that the time-course of multimodal corrections follows the predictions of a Kalman filter which continuously weighs sensory feedback and internal predictions according to their reliability. Importantly, we further show that changes in movement speed led to urgency-dependent modulations of control gains. Our results corroborate previous research linking motor control and decision-making by highlighting that multisensory feedback responses depend on sensory evidence accumulation and response urgency in a similar way as decision-making processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0262-24.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0262-24.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在做出感知决策时,人类会根据各感官模式的不确定性将信息结合起来。然而,人们仍然不知道大脑在运动过程中是如何整合多感官反馈的,除了感官的不确定性之外,还有哪些因素会影响感官的贡献。我们在健康成年人身上进行了两次伸手实验,以研究对视觉和机械综合扰动的运动校正是否会随着视觉不确定性的增加而增加。为了描述多模态反馈反应的动态变化,我们在运动过程中进一步改变了运动时间和视觉反馈持续时间。第一个实验的结果表明,视觉反馈的贡献随着不确定性的增加而减少。此外,我们还观察到一个瞬时阶段,在这一阶段中,视觉反馈反应在较快的运动中更为强烈。在后续实验中,我们发现当视觉反馈呈现时间较长时,视觉的贡献在慢速运动中增加得更快。与这些视觉反应相对应的肌肉活动在视觉反馈开始后约 100 毫秒表现出与感觉不确定性和运动速度的调节。通过使用最佳反馈控制模型,我们发现快速运动时视觉反馈反应的增加可以用控制增益随紧迫性而增加来解释。此外,较长的观看时间会增加视觉贡献这一事实表明,大脑会随着时间的推移不断积累感觉信息,以估计伸手过程中手臂的状态。我们的研究结果为伸手控制和决策之间的联系提供了更多证据,这两者似乎都受到感官证据积累和反应紧迫性的影响。在这里,我们测试了视觉不确定性、运动速度和视觉反馈持续时间如何影响对视觉和机械综合扰动的到达修正。利用最优反馈控制模型,我们说明了多模态校正的时间过程遵循卡尔曼滤波器的预测,卡尔曼滤波器会根据感觉反馈和内部预测的可靠性对其进行持续权衡。重要的是,我们进一步证明,运动速度的变化会导致控制增益随紧迫性而变化。我们的研究结果证实了之前将运动控制与决策联系起来的研究,强调了多感官反馈反应与决策过程类似,都依赖于感官证据的积累和反应的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dissociable effects of urgency and evidence accumulation during reaching revealed by dynamic multisensory integration.

When making perceptual decisions, humans combine information across sensory modalities dependent on their respective uncertainties. However, it remains unknown how the brain integrates multisensory feedback during movement, and which factors besides sensory uncertainty influence sensory contributions. We performed two reaching experiments on healthy adults to investigate whether movement corrections to combined visual and mechanical perturbations scale with visual uncertainty. To describe the dynamics of multimodal feedback responses, we further varied movement time and visual feedback duration during the movement. The results of our first experiment show that the contribution of visual feedback decreased with uncertainty. Additionally, we observed a transient phase during which visual feedback responses were stronger during faster movements. In a follow-up experiment, we found that the contribution of vision increased more quickly during slow movements when we presented the visual feedback for a longer time. Muscle activity corresponding to these visual responses exhibited modulations with sensory uncertainty and movement speed ca. 100ms following the onset of the visual feedback. Using an optimal feedback control model, we show that the increased response to visual feedback during fast movements can be explained by an urgency-dependent increase in control gains. Further, the fact that a longer viewing duration increased the visual contributions suggests that the brain accumulates sensory information over time to estimate the state of the arm during reaching. Our results provide additional evidence concerning the link between reaching control and decision-making, both of which appear to be influenced by sensory evidence accumulation and response urgency.Significance statement The time-course of multisensory integration during movement, along with the factors influencing this process, still requires further investigation. Here, we tested how visual uncertainty, movement speed, and visual feedback duration influence reach corrections to combined visual and mechanical perturbations. Using an optimal feedback control model, we illustrate that the time-course of multimodal corrections follows the predictions of a Kalman filter which continuously weighs sensory feedback and internal predictions according to their reliability. Importantly, we further show that changes in movement speed led to urgency-dependent modulations of control gains. Our results corroborate previous research linking motor control and decision-making by highlighting that multisensory feedback responses depend on sensory evidence accumulation and response urgency in a similar way as decision-making processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
期刊最新文献
New Vistas for the Relationship between Empathy and Political Ideology. Neural encoding of direction and distance across reference frames in visually guided reaching. Pupil Trend Reflects Sub-Optimal Alertness Maintenance Over 10 Seconds in Vigilance and Working Memory Performance: An Exploratory Study. The overexpression of eIF4E decreases oxytocin levels and induces social-cognitive behavioral disorders in mice. Impulsive Choices Emerge When the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Fails to Encode Deliberative Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1