与不育对照组相比,父母平衡易位携带者的可用胚胎率或活产率不会降低。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.11.010
Kyle Nguyen Le, Marcy Maguire, Nicolás Garrido Puchalt, Laura Lidon, Alejandro Sánchez-Martínez, Jason Franasiak, Emily Osman
{"title":"与不育对照组相比,父母平衡易位携带者的可用胚胎率或活产率不会降低。","authors":"Kyle Nguyen Le, Marcy Maguire, Nicolás Garrido Puchalt, Laura Lidon, Alejandro Sánchez-Martínez, Jason Franasiak, Emily Osman","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if translocation carriers have a reduced number of usable blastocysts compared to infertile controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All cycles of balanced translocation carriers undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-SR) for structural rearrangements at a single infertility center compared to an age-matched control cycles of infertile patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) from January 2012-August 2022.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Balanced translocation carriers.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures were blastulation rate, usable blastulation rates and live birth rate. Secondary outcome measures were sustained implantation rate, fertilization rate, number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II oocytes, total blastulation failure, number of 2 pronuclear embryos, and number of euploid embryos. Outcome measures were compared between male translocation carriers and controls, female translocation carriers and controls, and Robertsonian versus reciprocal translocation carriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,291 retrieval cycles from 993 patients were included, of which 255 patients were translocation carriers, while 738 were controls. Of those with translocations, 30 (11.5%) were Robertsonian and 231 (88.5%) were reciprocal carriers. There was a statistically significant difference in the blastulation rate between carriers and controls (59.5% versus 62.1%; p-value = 0.01). However, usable blastulation rates (47.2% versus 50.0%) were equivalent between groups. There were no differences in number of oocytes retrieved (18.5 versus 18.3), number of 2 pronuclear embryos (13.4 versus 12.5), sustained implantation rate (71.4% versus 75.1%) or live birth rate (63.0% versus 66.1%) between translocation carriers and controls. In both male and female translocation carriers versus controls, there were no differences in usable blastulation rates or live birth rates. When comparing Robertsonian with reciprocal translocation carriers, rates of blastulation, usable blastulation, sustained implantation, and live birth rate were equivalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite fewer euploid embryos, there were no differences in rates of usable blastulation or live birth rates in balanced translocation carriers, regardless of sex of affected partner or type of rearrangement, compared to controls. Routine karyotyping for blastulation failure may not be necessary based on these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental Balanced Translocation Carriers do not have Decreased Usable Blastulation Rates or Live Birth Rates Compared to Infertile Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Nguyen Le, Marcy Maguire, Nicolás Garrido Puchalt, Laura Lidon, Alejandro Sánchez-Martínez, Jason Franasiak, Emily Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.11.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if translocation carriers have a reduced number of usable blastocysts compared to infertile controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All cycles of balanced translocation carriers undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-SR) for structural rearrangements at a single infertility center compared to an age-matched control cycles of infertile patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) from January 2012-August 2022.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Balanced translocation carriers.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures were blastulation rate, usable blastulation rates and live birth rate. Secondary outcome measures were sustained implantation rate, fertilization rate, number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II oocytes, total blastulation failure, number of 2 pronuclear embryos, and number of euploid embryos. Outcome measures were compared between male translocation carriers and controls, female translocation carriers and controls, and Robertsonian versus reciprocal translocation carriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,291 retrieval cycles from 993 patients were included, of which 255 patients were translocation carriers, while 738 were controls. Of those with translocations, 30 (11.5%) were Robertsonian and 231 (88.5%) were reciprocal carriers. There was a statistically significant difference in the blastulation rate between carriers and controls (59.5% versus 62.1%; p-value = 0.01). However, usable blastulation rates (47.2% versus 50.0%) were equivalent between groups. There were no differences in number of oocytes retrieved (18.5 versus 18.3), number of 2 pronuclear embryos (13.4 versus 12.5), sustained implantation rate (71.4% versus 75.1%) or live birth rate (63.0% versus 66.1%) between translocation carriers and controls. In both male and female translocation carriers versus controls, there were no differences in usable blastulation rates or live birth rates. When comparing Robertsonian with reciprocal translocation carriers, rates of blastulation, usable blastulation, sustained implantation, and live birth rate were equivalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite fewer euploid embryos, there were no differences in rates of usable blastulation or live birth rates in balanced translocation carriers, regardless of sex of affected partner or type of rearrangement, compared to controls. Routine karyotyping for blastulation failure may not be necessary based on these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.11.010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.11.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定与不育对照组相比,易位携带者可用囊胚的数量是否会减少:设计:回顾性队列研究:2012年1月至2022年8月期间,在一家不孕不育中心接受植入前基因检测(PGT-SR)的平衡易位携带者与接受植入前基因检测(PGT-A)的非整倍体不孕患者的年龄匹配对照周期进行比较:主要结果指标:胚胎着床率、可用胚胎着床率和活产率。次要结果指标为持续植入率、受精率、取回的卵母细胞数、分裂期 II 卵母细胞数、胚胎移植失败总数、2 个无核胚胎数和优倍体胚胎数。对男性易位携带者与对照组、女性易位携带者与对照组、罗伯逊易位携带者与互易易位携带者的结果进行了比较:共纳入993名患者的1291个取卵周期,其中255名患者为易位携带者,738名患者为对照组。在易位携带者中,30 例(11.5%)为罗伯逊型,231 例(88.5%)为互易型。携带者和对照组之间的胚泡形成率差异有统计学意义(59.5% 对 62.1%;P 值 = 0.01)。不过,两组之间的可用胚泡率(47.2% 对 50.0%)相当。易位携带者和对照组在取卵数(18.5 对 18.3)、2 个无核胚胎数(13.4 对 12.5)、持续植入率(71.4% 对 75.1%)或活产率(63.0% 对 66.1%)方面没有差异。男性和女性易位携带者与对照组相比,可用胚泡率或活产率均无差异。在比较罗伯逊易位携带者和互易易位携带者时,胚胎着床率、可用胚胎着床率、持续着床率和活产率均相同:结论:尽管平衡易位携带者的优倍体胚胎较少,但与对照组相比,其可用胚泡形成率或活产率并无差异,与受影响伴侣的性别或重排类型无关。根据这些研究结果,可能没有必要对胚胎移植失败进行常规核型分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental Balanced Translocation Carriers do not have Decreased Usable Blastulation Rates or Live Birth Rates Compared to Infertile Controls.

Objective: To determine if translocation carriers have a reduced number of usable blastocysts compared to infertile controls.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects: All cycles of balanced translocation carriers undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-SR) for structural rearrangements at a single infertility center compared to an age-matched control cycles of infertile patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) from January 2012-August 2022.

Exposure: Balanced translocation carriers.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were blastulation rate, usable blastulation rates and live birth rate. Secondary outcome measures were sustained implantation rate, fertilization rate, number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II oocytes, total blastulation failure, number of 2 pronuclear embryos, and number of euploid embryos. Outcome measures were compared between male translocation carriers and controls, female translocation carriers and controls, and Robertsonian versus reciprocal translocation carriers.

Results: A total of 1,291 retrieval cycles from 993 patients were included, of which 255 patients were translocation carriers, while 738 were controls. Of those with translocations, 30 (11.5%) were Robertsonian and 231 (88.5%) were reciprocal carriers. There was a statistically significant difference in the blastulation rate between carriers and controls (59.5% versus 62.1%; p-value = 0.01). However, usable blastulation rates (47.2% versus 50.0%) were equivalent between groups. There were no differences in number of oocytes retrieved (18.5 versus 18.3), number of 2 pronuclear embryos (13.4 versus 12.5), sustained implantation rate (71.4% versus 75.1%) or live birth rate (63.0% versus 66.1%) between translocation carriers and controls. In both male and female translocation carriers versus controls, there were no differences in usable blastulation rates or live birth rates. When comparing Robertsonian with reciprocal translocation carriers, rates of blastulation, usable blastulation, sustained implantation, and live birth rate were equivalent.

Conclusion: Despite fewer euploid embryos, there were no differences in rates of usable blastulation or live birth rates in balanced translocation carriers, regardless of sex of affected partner or type of rearrangement, compared to controls. Routine karyotyping for blastulation failure may not be necessary based on these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Ovarian tissue allografts: the next frontier of reproductive transplantation? An umbrella review of meta-analyses regarding the incidence of female-specific malignancies after fertility treatment. A Long Road Ahead: Medical Management for Endometriosis-Related Pain. Just keep looking. Classification of Human Ovarian Follicle Morphology: Recommendations of the NICHD-Sponsored Ovarian Nomenclature Workshop. Comment on: Endometriosis and mental health disorders: identification and treatment as part of a multimodal approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1