焦虑概念引入中国:专题历史研究。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410748
Peng Miao
{"title":"焦虑概念引入中国:专题历史研究。","authors":"Peng Miao","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article presents a thematic historical study on the introduction of \"anxiety\" to modern China. Based on seminal research conducted previously by European scholars on histories of psychological and psychiatric concepts, this article reviews the itinerary of \"anxiety\" to China by using multiple types of textual evidence. Alongside a detailed description of how \"anxiety\" was translated and introduced, a comparison between the notions of \"anxiety\" in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Western psychoanalytic approaches was made. The processes of how \"depression\" and \"anxiety\" were introduced to China were also compared.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three types of textual evidence were meticulously analyzed. First, lexicographical works published since the 19<sup>th</sup> century were examined to trace the initial introduction and observe the standardized translation of \"anxiety\" in Chinese. Second, newspaper and periodical articles were analyzed to understand how knowledge of \"anxiety\" was communicated to the general public. Third, the evolution of psychological and psychiatric terminologies was observed through medical books.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that \"anxiety\" was initially translated into various Chinese terms, with \"jiaolyu\" eventually emerging as the standardized term after 1949. The textual evidence showed that \"anxiety\" began to be acknowledged as a disease concept in the early 20<sup>th</sup> century, though it was not formally recognized as a diagnostic category until the late 20<sup>th</sup> century. This article also highlights the differences between the Western psychoanalytic view on anxiety and the Chinese folk conception of it.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>It was observed that the introduction processes of depression and anxiety to China were similar, though their conceptual histories in the West showed much difference. The fading of neurasthenia marked a new era of psychiatric development in China, characterized by an enhanced specificity in the classification of mental disorders, which was never observed in the discourse about \"xin feng,\" a corresponding TCM notion of \"anxiety.\" The article also underscores the need for further exploration of corresponding TCM concepts of \"anxiety\" and the assimilation of Western psychiatric concepts in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1410748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The introduction of the concept of anxiety into China: a thematic historical study.\",\"authors\":\"Peng Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article presents a thematic historical study on the introduction of \\\"anxiety\\\" to modern China. Based on seminal research conducted previously by European scholars on histories of psychological and psychiatric concepts, this article reviews the itinerary of \\\"anxiety\\\" to China by using multiple types of textual evidence. Alongside a detailed description of how \\\"anxiety\\\" was translated and introduced, a comparison between the notions of \\\"anxiety\\\" in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Western psychoanalytic approaches was made. The processes of how \\\"depression\\\" and \\\"anxiety\\\" were introduced to China were also compared.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three types of textual evidence were meticulously analyzed. First, lexicographical works published since the 19<sup>th</sup> century were examined to trace the initial introduction and observe the standardized translation of \\\"anxiety\\\" in Chinese. Second, newspaper and periodical articles were analyzed to understand how knowledge of \\\"anxiety\\\" was communicated to the general public. Third, the evolution of psychological and psychiatric terminologies was observed through medical books.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that \\\"anxiety\\\" was initially translated into various Chinese terms, with \\\"jiaolyu\\\" eventually emerging as the standardized term after 1949. The textual evidence showed that \\\"anxiety\\\" began to be acknowledged as a disease concept in the early 20<sup>th</sup> century, though it was not formally recognized as a diagnostic category until the late 20<sup>th</sup> century. This article also highlights the differences between the Western psychoanalytic view on anxiety and the Chinese folk conception of it.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>It was observed that the introduction processes of depression and anxiety to China were similar, though their conceptual histories in the West showed much difference. The fading of neurasthenia marked a new era of psychiatric development in China, characterized by an enhanced specificity in the classification of mental disorders, which was never observed in the discourse about \\\"xin feng,\\\" a corresponding TCM notion of \\\"anxiety.\\\" The article also underscores the need for further exploration of corresponding TCM concepts of \\\"anxiety\\\" and the assimilation of Western psychiatric concepts in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1410748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552535/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410748\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本文对 "焦虑 "传入近代中国进行了专题历史研究。基于欧洲学者此前对心理学和精神病学概念史的开创性研究,本文通过多种文本证据回顾了 "焦虑 "传入中国的历程。在详细描述 "焦虑 "是如何被翻译和引入的同时,还对传统中医和西方精神分析方法中的 "焦虑 "概念进行了比较。此外,还比较了 "抑郁 "和 "焦虑 "如何被引入中国:对三类文本证据进行了细致分析。首先,研究了 19 世纪以来出版的辞书,以追溯 "焦虑 "的最初引入,并观察 "焦虑 "在中文中的标准化翻译。其次,分析了报纸和期刊文章,以了解 "焦虑 "知识是如何传播给大众的。第三,通过医学书籍观察心理学和精神病学术语的演变:结果:研究发现,"焦虑 "最初被翻译成各种中文术语,"焦虑症 "最终在 1949 年后成为标准术语。文本证据显示,"焦虑 "作为一种疾病概念在 20 世纪初开始得到承认,但直到 20 世纪末才被正式确认为一种诊断类别。本文还强调了西方精神分析学派的焦虑观与中国民间焦虑观之间的差异:据观察,抑郁症和焦虑症传入中国的过程相似,但它们在西方的概念史却有很大差异。神经衰弱的消退标志着中国精神病学发展进入了一个新时代,其特点是精神疾病分类的特殊性增强,而这在有关 "心风 "的论述中从未出现过,"心风 "是与 "焦虑 "相对应的中医概念。文章还强调,有必要进一步探讨相应的中医 "焦虑 "概念以及西方精神病学概念在中国的吸收情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The introduction of the concept of anxiety into China: a thematic historical study.

Introduction: This article presents a thematic historical study on the introduction of "anxiety" to modern China. Based on seminal research conducted previously by European scholars on histories of psychological and psychiatric concepts, this article reviews the itinerary of "anxiety" to China by using multiple types of textual evidence. Alongside a detailed description of how "anxiety" was translated and introduced, a comparison between the notions of "anxiety" in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Western psychoanalytic approaches was made. The processes of how "depression" and "anxiety" were introduced to China were also compared.

Materials and methods: Three types of textual evidence were meticulously analyzed. First, lexicographical works published since the 19th century were examined to trace the initial introduction and observe the standardized translation of "anxiety" in Chinese. Second, newspaper and periodical articles were analyzed to understand how knowledge of "anxiety" was communicated to the general public. Third, the evolution of psychological and psychiatric terminologies was observed through medical books.

Results: It was found that "anxiety" was initially translated into various Chinese terms, with "jiaolyu" eventually emerging as the standardized term after 1949. The textual evidence showed that "anxiety" began to be acknowledged as a disease concept in the early 20th century, though it was not formally recognized as a diagnostic category until the late 20th century. This article also highlights the differences between the Western psychoanalytic view on anxiety and the Chinese folk conception of it.

Discussion and conclusions: It was observed that the introduction processes of depression and anxiety to China were similar, though their conceptual histories in the West showed much difference. The fading of neurasthenia marked a new era of psychiatric development in China, characterized by an enhanced specificity in the classification of mental disorders, which was never observed in the discourse about "xin feng," a corresponding TCM notion of "anxiety." The article also underscores the need for further exploration of corresponding TCM concepts of "anxiety" and the assimilation of Western psychiatric concepts in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
期刊最新文献
Capturing spontaneous interactivity: a multi-measure approach to analyzing the dynamics of interpersonal coordination in dance improvisation. Editorial: Animacy in cognition: effects, mechanisms, and theories. Social and ethical impact of emotional AI advancement: the rise of pseudo-intimacy relationships and challenges in human interactions. The relationship between distress tolerance and life satisfaction among young adults in Saudi Arabia. The role of information and participation in overcoming users' initial reluctance: a case study of a decentralized wastewater treatment plant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1