农村糖尿病患者健康素养的差异及影响社会支持类别的因素。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373591
Xin Zhang, Yan-Ping Zhang, Lin Zeng, Xiang Li, Jia-Xia Han, Gui-Fen Fu, Chao-Qun Bai, Xiao-Xue Lei
{"title":"农村糖尿病患者健康素养的差异及影响社会支持类别的因素。","authors":"Xin Zhang, Yan-Ping Zhang, Lin Zeng, Xiang Li, Jia-Xia Han, Gui-Fen Fu, Chao-Qun Bai, Xiao-Xue Lei","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to explore the inherent classification of social support among individuals residing in rural areas of China. Additionally, we aim to examine the attributes and variations in health literacy scores among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) within diverse social support categories.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing the multi-stage stratified sampling technique, we enrolled 2,178 patients diagnosed with DM residing in the rural regions of Guangxi Province. We utilized the General Information Questionnaire, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rural patients with DM were categorized into four distinct groups based on the types and levels of their underlying social support. These groups included a low-level social support utilization group (43%), a low-level objective social support group (17%), a moderate-level social support group (20%), and a high-level social support and high-level utilization group (20%). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the four groups in terms of age, disease duration, and blood sugar control level (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, health literacy scores and scores across various dimensions for rural patients with DM demonstrated variability in accordance with latent profiles of social support, with statistically significant differences observed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A positive correlation was identified between the level of social support and all dimensions of health literacy among rural patients with DM (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The social support available to individuals with DM in rural settings can be categorized into four distinct types, and its manifestation is influenced by demographic factors. The health literacy of rural patients with DM is intricately linked to the extent of social support they receive. For enhanced outcomes, interventions targeted at enhancing health literacy and quality of life among rural patients with DM should be tailored to address the heterogeneity observed in latent profiles of social support.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1373591"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in health literacy and influential factors affecting the categories of social support among rural patients with diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Zhang, Yan-Ping Zhang, Lin Zeng, Xiang Li, Jia-Xia Han, Gui-Fen Fu, Chao-Qun Bai, Xiao-Xue Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to explore the inherent classification of social support among individuals residing in rural areas of China. Additionally, we aim to examine the attributes and variations in health literacy scores among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) within diverse social support categories.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing the multi-stage stratified sampling technique, we enrolled 2,178 patients diagnosed with DM residing in the rural regions of Guangxi Province. We utilized the General Information Questionnaire, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rural patients with DM were categorized into four distinct groups based on the types and levels of their underlying social support. These groups included a low-level social support utilization group (43%), a low-level objective social support group (17%), a moderate-level social support group (20%), and a high-level social support and high-level utilization group (20%). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the four groups in terms of age, disease duration, and blood sugar control level (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, health literacy scores and scores across various dimensions for rural patients with DM demonstrated variability in accordance with latent profiles of social support, with statistically significant differences observed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A positive correlation was identified between the level of social support and all dimensions of health literacy among rural patients with DM (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The social support available to individuals with DM in rural settings can be categorized into four distinct types, and its manifestation is influenced by demographic factors. The health literacy of rural patients with DM is intricately linked to the extent of social support they receive. For enhanced outcomes, interventions targeted at enhancing health literacy and quality of life among rural patients with DM should be tailored to address the heterogeneity observed in latent profiles of social support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1373591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨中国农村地区居民对社会支持的固有分类。此外,我们还旨在研究不同社会支持类别中糖尿病(DM)患者健康素养得分的属性和差异:设计:横断面研究:方法:采用多阶段分层抽样技术,对居住在广西省农村地区的2178名糖尿病患者进行调查。采用一般信息问卷、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)、功能、沟通和关键健康素养问卷进行调查:结果:根据社会支持的类型和水平,农村 DM 患者被分为四个不同的群体。这些组别包括低水平社会支持利用组(43%)、低水平客观社会支持组(17%)、中等水平社会支持组(20%)以及高水平社会支持和高水平利用组(20%)。统计分析显示,四个组别在年龄、病程和血糖控制水平方面存在明显差异(P < 0.05)。此外,农村糖尿病患者的健康素养得分和各维度得分与社会支持的潜在特征存在差异,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。农村糖尿病患者的社会支持水平与健康素养的所有维度之间呈正相关(p < 0.05):结论:农村地区糖尿病患者可获得的社会支持可分为四种不同类型,其表现形式受人口因素的影响。农村糖尿病患者的健康素养与他们获得的社会支持程度密切相关。为了提高疗效,针对提高农村糖尿病患者健康素养和生活质量的干预措施应针对社会支持潜在特征的异质性而量身定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variations in health literacy and influential factors affecting the categories of social support among rural patients with diabetes mellitus.

Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the inherent classification of social support among individuals residing in rural areas of China. Additionally, we aim to examine the attributes and variations in health literacy scores among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) within diverse social support categories.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: Employing the multi-stage stratified sampling technique, we enrolled 2,178 patients diagnosed with DM residing in the rural regions of Guangxi Province. We utilized the General Information Questionnaire, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Instrument.

Results: The rural patients with DM were categorized into four distinct groups based on the types and levels of their underlying social support. These groups included a low-level social support utilization group (43%), a low-level objective social support group (17%), a moderate-level social support group (20%), and a high-level social support and high-level utilization group (20%). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the four groups in terms of age, disease duration, and blood sugar control level (p < 0.05). Furthermore, health literacy scores and scores across various dimensions for rural patients with DM demonstrated variability in accordance with latent profiles of social support, with statistically significant differences observed (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was identified between the level of social support and all dimensions of health literacy among rural patients with DM (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The social support available to individuals with DM in rural settings can be categorized into four distinct types, and its manifestation is influenced by demographic factors. The health literacy of rural patients with DM is intricately linked to the extent of social support they receive. For enhanced outcomes, interventions targeted at enhancing health literacy and quality of life among rural patients with DM should be tailored to address the heterogeneity observed in latent profiles of social support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of identification and management of perinatal anxiety: a qualitative interview study with postnatal women. Assessment of the relationship between living alone and suicidal behaviors based on prospective studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of intergenerational support on older adults' care expectations in rural areas in China. Investigating a severe acute malnutrition outbreak in Dubti District, Awsiresu Zone, Afar Region, Northeast Ethiopia (2022). Socio-demographic determinants of dietary choices and their impact on health in Spanish adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1