腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术中合并分割脾血管和胰腺实质是一种安全的替代单独分割的方法:一项单一机构的回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hpb Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002
Kareem Sadek, Andrew Shaker, Mary Tice, John A Stauffer
{"title":"腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术中合并分割脾血管和胰腺实质是一种安全的替代单独分割的方法:一项单一机构的回顾性研究。","authors":"Kareem Sadek, Andrew Shaker, Mary Tice, John A Stauffer","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exists regarding the safety and outcomes of combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). This study aims to evaluate the combined division technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent LDP for pancreatic cancer from April 2011 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into the following groups: combined (CV) versus separate (SV) division of the splenic vein; combined (CA) versus separate (SA) division of the splenic artery; and combined (CAV) versus separate (SAV) division of the splenic artery and vein, with or without the pancreatic parenchyma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 80 patients included, 44 underwent CV and 36 underwent SV. Operative time and major morbidity were significantly lower in CV compared with SV. Similar findings were observed in CAV versus SAV, as well as lower blood loss in CAV. Operative time was significantly lower in CA versus SA. Pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage rates showed no significant differences between groups. No patient developed splenic arteriovenous fistula in follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during LDP is safe and associated with improved outcomes compared with separate division.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined division of the splenic vessels and pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe alternative to separate division: a single-institution retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Kareem Sadek, Andrew Shaker, Mary Tice, John A Stauffer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exists regarding the safety and outcomes of combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). This study aims to evaluate the combined division technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent LDP for pancreatic cancer from April 2011 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into the following groups: combined (CV) versus separate (SV) division of the splenic vein; combined (CA) versus separate (SA) division of the splenic artery; and combined (CAV) versus separate (SAV) division of the splenic artery and vein, with or without the pancreatic parenchyma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 80 patients included, 44 underwent CV and 36 underwent SV. Operative time and major morbidity were significantly lower in CV compared with SV. Similar findings were observed in CAV versus SAV, as well as lower blood loss in CAV. Operative time was significantly lower in CA versus SA. Pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage rates showed no significant differences between groups. No patient developed splenic arteriovenous fistula in follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during LDP is safe and associated with improved outcomes compared with separate division.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hpb\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hpb\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术(LDP)中脾血管与胰腺实质联合分割的安全性和结果的数据有限。本研究旨在评估联合分割技术:回顾性研究2011年4月至2022年12月期间因胰腺癌接受腹腔镜胰腺切除术的患者,并将其分为以下几组:脾静脉联合(CV)与单独(SV)分割;脾动脉联合(CA)与单独(SA)分割;脾动脉与静脉联合(CAV)与单独(SAV)分割,有无胰腺实质:在纳入的 80 位患者中,44 位接受了 CV,36 位接受了 SV。与 SV 相比,CV 的手术时间和主要发病率明显较低。CAV与SAV的结果相似,CAV的失血量更低。CA与SA相比,手术时间明显更短。胰瘘和胰腺切除术后出血率在组间无明显差异。随访中没有患者出现脾动静脉瘘:结论:在 LDP 期间将脾血管与胰腺实质合并分割是安全的,与单独分割相比,其结果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combined division of the splenic vessels and pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe alternative to separate division: a single-institution retrospective study.

Background: Limited data exists regarding the safety and outcomes of combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). This study aims to evaluate the combined division technique.

Methods: Patients who underwent LDP for pancreatic cancer from April 2011 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into the following groups: combined (CV) versus separate (SV) division of the splenic vein; combined (CA) versus separate (SA) division of the splenic artery; and combined (CAV) versus separate (SAV) division of the splenic artery and vein, with or without the pancreatic parenchyma.

Results: Among the 80 patients included, 44 underwent CV and 36 underwent SV. Operative time and major morbidity were significantly lower in CV compared with SV. Similar findings were observed in CAV versus SAV, as well as lower blood loss in CAV. Operative time was significantly lower in CA versus SA. Pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage rates showed no significant differences between groups. No patient developed splenic arteriovenous fistula in follow-up.

Conclusion: Combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during LDP is safe and associated with improved outcomes compared with separate division.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hpb
Hpb GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication. Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice. Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice. HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields. Abstracted and Indexed in: MEDLINE® EMBASE PubMed Science Citation Index Expanded Academic Search (EBSCO) HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).
期刊最新文献
Advancing excellence: a national peer-coaching program for advanced laparoscopic HPB techniques. Outcome of a 'step-up approach' for recurrent cholangitis in patients with a non-stenotic hepaticojejunostomy after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: single center series. Open versus minimally invasive hepatic and pancreatic surgery: 1-year costs, healthcare utilization and days of work lost. Adjunct mucin biomarkers MUC2+MUC5AC and MUC5AC+PSCA in a clinical setting identify and may improve correct selection of high-risk pancreatic lesions for surgery. Conference Calendar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1