W J van Genuchten, H Averesch, Q M van Dieren, D Bonnet, M Odemarsky, M Beghetti, J W Roos-Hesselink, Z Reinhardt, C Male, E Naumburg, E Boersma, D De Wolf, W A Helbing
{"title":"循环生物标志物对预测先天性心脏病患者不良心脏事件的临床影响。系统综述。","authors":"W J van Genuchten, H Averesch, Q M van Dieren, D Bonnet, M Odemarsky, M Beghetti, J W Roos-Hesselink, Z Reinhardt, C Male, E Naumburg, E Boersma, D De Wolf, W A Helbing","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with congenital heart disease (ConHD) are at increased risk for adverse cardiac events. Predicting long-term outcomes and guidance of patient management might benefit from a range of (new) biomarkers. This is a rapidly evolving field with potentially large consequences for clinical decision making. With a systematic review of available biomarkers in ConHD we identified the clinical role of these markers, knowledge gaps and future research directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature on associations between blood biomarkers and outcome measures (mortality or composite adverse outcomes in patients with ConHD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inclusion criteria were met by 102 articles. Biomarkers assessed in more than studies are discussed in the main text, those studied in 3 or less studies are summarized in the supplement. Thus, we discuss 15 biomarkers from 92 studies. These biomarkers were studied in 32,399 / 10,735 patients for the association with mortality and composite adverse outcomes, respectively. Biomarkers that were studied most and had statistically significant associations with mortality or composite adverse outcomes were (NT-pro)BNP, MELD-XI score, Hs-CRP, creatinine, albumin and sodium. Most of these biomarkers are involved in intracardiac processes associated with inflammation or are markers of renal function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For (NT-pro)BNP, clinical value for prediction of mortality and composite adverse outcomes in adult and paediatric ConHD has been shown. For MELD-XI, hs-CRP, albumin, creatinine, sodium, RDW, and GDF-15, correlations with mortality and composite adverse outcomes have been demonstrated in patient groups with mixed types of ConHD, but clinical utility needs additional exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of circulating biomarkers in prediction of adverse cardiac events in patients with congenital heart disease. A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"W J van Genuchten, H Averesch, Q M van Dieren, D Bonnet, M Odemarsky, M Beghetti, J W Roos-Hesselink, Z Reinhardt, C Male, E Naumburg, E Boersma, D De Wolf, W A Helbing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with congenital heart disease (ConHD) are at increased risk for adverse cardiac events. Predicting long-term outcomes and guidance of patient management might benefit from a range of (new) biomarkers. This is a rapidly evolving field with potentially large consequences for clinical decision making. With a systematic review of available biomarkers in ConHD we identified the clinical role of these markers, knowledge gaps and future research directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature on associations between blood biomarkers and outcome measures (mortality or composite adverse outcomes in patients with ConHD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inclusion criteria were met by 102 articles. Biomarkers assessed in more than studies are discussed in the main text, those studied in 3 or less studies are summarized in the supplement. Thus, we discuss 15 biomarkers from 92 studies. These biomarkers were studied in 32,399 / 10,735 patients for the association with mortality and composite adverse outcomes, respectively. Biomarkers that were studied most and had statistically significant associations with mortality or composite adverse outcomes were (NT-pro)BNP, MELD-XI score, Hs-CRP, creatinine, albumin and sodium. Most of these biomarkers are involved in intracardiac processes associated with inflammation or are markers of renal function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For (NT-pro)BNP, clinical value for prediction of mortality and composite adverse outcomes in adult and paediatric ConHD has been shown. For MELD-XI, hs-CRP, albumin, creatinine, sodium, RDW, and GDF-15, correlations with mortality and composite adverse outcomes have been demonstrated in patient groups with mixed types of ConHD, but clinical utility needs additional exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132723\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical impact of circulating biomarkers in prediction of adverse cardiac events in patients with congenital heart disease. A systematic review.
Introduction: Patients with congenital heart disease (ConHD) are at increased risk for adverse cardiac events. Predicting long-term outcomes and guidance of patient management might benefit from a range of (new) biomarkers. This is a rapidly evolving field with potentially large consequences for clinical decision making. With a systematic review of available biomarkers in ConHD we identified the clinical role of these markers, knowledge gaps and future research directions.
Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature on associations between blood biomarkers and outcome measures (mortality or composite adverse outcomes in patients with ConHD.
Results: The inclusion criteria were met by 102 articles. Biomarkers assessed in more than studies are discussed in the main text, those studied in 3 or less studies are summarized in the supplement. Thus, we discuss 15 biomarkers from 92 studies. These biomarkers were studied in 32,399 / 10,735 patients for the association with mortality and composite adverse outcomes, respectively. Biomarkers that were studied most and had statistically significant associations with mortality or composite adverse outcomes were (NT-pro)BNP, MELD-XI score, Hs-CRP, creatinine, albumin and sodium. Most of these biomarkers are involved in intracardiac processes associated with inflammation or are markers of renal function.
Conclusion: For (NT-pro)BNP, clinical value for prediction of mortality and composite adverse outcomes in adult and paediatric ConHD has been shown. For MELD-XI, hs-CRP, albumin, creatinine, sodium, RDW, and GDF-15, correlations with mortality and composite adverse outcomes have been demonstrated in patient groups with mixed types of ConHD, but clinical utility needs additional exploration.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.