绘制有边缘型人格障碍和无边缘型人格障碍的年轻人在非自杀性自伤中的惩罚回避学习缺陷:fMRI研究。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.026
Stella Nicolaou, Juan Carlos Pascual, Joaquim Soler, Gregori Ortega, Josep Marco-Pallarés, Daniel Vega Moreno
{"title":"绘制有边缘型人格障碍和无边缘型人格障碍的年轻人在非自杀性自伤中的惩罚回避学习缺陷:fMRI研究。","authors":"Stella Nicolaou, Juan Carlos Pascual, Joaquim Soler, Gregori Ortega, Josep Marco-Pallarés, Daniel Vega Moreno","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a growing public health concern among young adults in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Despite evidence linking NSSI to alterations in learning from reward and punishment, this area remains understudied, especially in non-clinical populations without borderline personality disorder (BPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a modified version of the Probabilistic Stimulus Selection (PSS) task in two groups of young adults with recurrent NSSI, with (NSSI+BPD) and without BPD (NSSI), and an additional group of healthy controls (HC). While undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants were asked to choose between pairs of stimuli with different reward probabilities. In the training phase, they received probabilistic feedback and learned to identify the most rewarding option within fixed pairs. In the test phase, these learned stimuli were recombined into novel pairs, where participants' accuracy in selecting the most rewarding and avoiding the most punishing options reflected their ability to learn from reward and punishment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to HC, participants in the NSSI and NSSI+BPD groups were less accurate at avoiding the most punishing options than at choosing the most rewarding options, and showed reduced activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) during punishment avoidance relative to reward selection.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The modest sample size, descriptive rather than modeling approach, and absence of ecological momentary assessments may limit the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that reduced activation of the NAcc when avoiding loss may underlie difficulties in learning to avoid punishment in young adults with NSSI, regardless of the presence of BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping punishment avoidance learning deficits in non-suicidal self-injury in young adults with and without borderline personality disorder: An fMRI study.\",\"authors\":\"Stella Nicolaou, Juan Carlos Pascual, Joaquim Soler, Gregori Ortega, Josep Marco-Pallarés, Daniel Vega Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a growing public health concern among young adults in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Despite evidence linking NSSI to alterations in learning from reward and punishment, this area remains understudied, especially in non-clinical populations without borderline personality disorder (BPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a modified version of the Probabilistic Stimulus Selection (PSS) task in two groups of young adults with recurrent NSSI, with (NSSI+BPD) and without BPD (NSSI), and an additional group of healthy controls (HC). While undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants were asked to choose between pairs of stimuli with different reward probabilities. In the training phase, they received probabilistic feedback and learned to identify the most rewarding option within fixed pairs. In the test phase, these learned stimuli were recombined into novel pairs, where participants' accuracy in selecting the most rewarding and avoiding the most punishing options reflected their ability to learn from reward and punishment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to HC, participants in the NSSI and NSSI+BPD groups were less accurate at avoiding the most punishing options than at choosing the most rewarding options, and showed reduced activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) during punishment avoidance relative to reward selection.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The modest sample size, descriptive rather than modeling approach, and absence of ecological momentary assessments may limit the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that reduced activation of the NAcc when avoiding loss may underlie difficulties in learning to avoid punishment in young adults with NSSI, regardless of the presence of BPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在临床和非临床环境中,非自杀性自伤(NSSI)日益成为年轻成年人关注的公共健康问题。尽管有证据表明 NSSI 与奖惩学习的改变有关,但这一领域的研究仍然不足,尤其是在没有边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的非临床人群中:我们在两组反复发生 NSSI 的年轻成年人(NSSI+BPD)和无 BPD(NSSI)以及另一组健康对照组(HC)中采用了改进版的概率刺激选择(PSS)任务。在接受功能磁共振成像(fMRI)检查时,参与者被要求在具有不同奖励概率的成对刺激之间做出选择。在训练阶段,他们会收到概率反馈,并学会在固定的刺激对中找出最有奖励的选项。在测试阶段,这些学习到的刺激被重新组合成新的刺激对,参与者选择最有奖励和避免最有惩罚的选项的准确性分别反映了他们从奖励和惩罚中学习的能力:结果:与HC组相比,NSSI组和NSSI+BPD组的参与者回避惩罚性最强选项的准确性低于选择奖赏性最强选项的准确性,并且在回避惩罚时,相对于选择奖赏时,NAcc的活动减少:局限性:样本数量不多、描述性而非建模方法以及缺乏生态学瞬间评估可能会限制研究结果:研究结果表明,无论是否存在BPD,NSSI年轻成人在避免损失时NAcc激活减少可能是学会避免惩罚的困难的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mapping punishment avoidance learning deficits in non-suicidal self-injury in young adults with and without borderline personality disorder: An fMRI study.

Introduction: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a growing public health concern among young adults in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Despite evidence linking NSSI to alterations in learning from reward and punishment, this area remains understudied, especially in non-clinical populations without borderline personality disorder (BPD).

Methods: We employed a modified version of the Probabilistic Stimulus Selection (PSS) task in two groups of young adults with recurrent NSSI, with (NSSI+BPD) and without BPD (NSSI), and an additional group of healthy controls (HC). While undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants were asked to choose between pairs of stimuli with different reward probabilities. In the training phase, they received probabilistic feedback and learned to identify the most rewarding option within fixed pairs. In the test phase, these learned stimuli were recombined into novel pairs, where participants' accuracy in selecting the most rewarding and avoiding the most punishing options reflected their ability to learn from reward and punishment, respectively.

Results: Compared to HC, participants in the NSSI and NSSI+BPD groups were less accurate at avoiding the most punishing options than at choosing the most rewarding options, and showed reduced activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) during punishment avoidance relative to reward selection.

Limitations: The modest sample size, descriptive rather than modeling approach, and absence of ecological momentary assessments may limit the results.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that reduced activation of the NAcc when avoiding loss may underlie difficulties in learning to avoid punishment in young adults with NSSI, regardless of the presence of BPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Associations between post-traumatic stress disorder and neurological disorders: A genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization study. Symptoms of depression, but not PTSD, influence cognitive performance in healthy Army National Guard Soldiers. Validation and psychometric properties of the bipolar prodrome symptom interview and scale-full prospective Chinese version to assess individuals at risk for bipolar disorder. Affects, dissociative symptoms and addictive behaviours: Insights from clinical and non-clinical samples. Association between frailty and common psychiatric disorders: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1