Robert A Hegele, Zahid Ahmad, Ambika Ashraf, Andrew Baldassarra, Alan S Brown, Alan Chait, Steven D Freedman, Brenda Kohn, Michael Miller, Nivedita Patni, Daniel E Soffer, Jian Wang, Michael S Broder, Eunice Chang, Irina Yermilov, Cynthia Campos, Sarah N Gibbs
{"title":"在北美制定和验证识别家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征(FCS)的临床标准。","authors":"Robert A Hegele, Zahid Ahmad, Ambika Ashraf, Andrew Baldassarra, Alan S Brown, Alan Chait, Steven D Freedman, Brenda Kohn, Michael Miller, Nivedita Patni, Daniel E Soffer, Jian Wang, Michael S Broder, Eunice Chang, Irina Yermilov, Cynthia Campos, Sarah N Gibbs","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is an ultrarare inherited disorder. Genetic testing is not always feasible or conclusive. European clinicians developed a \"FCS score\" to differentiate between FCS and multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), a more common condition with overlapping features. A diagnostic score has not been developed for use in the North American context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a diagnostic score for North American patients based on signs, symptoms and biochemical traits of FCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process, we convened ten US/Canadian physicians with experience recognizing and treating FCS and one adult patient with FCS. The panel developed and rated 296 scenarios describing patients with FCS. Linear regression analyses used median post-meeting ratings to develop score parameters. We tested the score's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in patients with classical FCS, functional FCS, and MCS from Western University's Lipid Genetics Clinic's registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerical scores were attributed based upon the following: age, hypertriglyceridemia onset, body mass index, history of abdominal pain/pancreatitis, presence of secondary factors, triglyceride (TG) levels, ratio of TG/total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B level. Scores ≥60 indicate definite classical FCS; the score distinguished patients with FCS from MCS in a real-world registry (100.0 % specificity, 66.7 % sensitivity, 100.0 % PPV, 95.5 % NPV). Scores ≥45 were \"very likely\" to have classical FCS (96.9 % specificity, 88.9 % sensitivity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given its simplicity and high specificity for distinguishing patients with FCS from MCS, the NAFCS Score could be used in lieu of - or while awaiting - genetic testing to optimize treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of clinical criteria to identify familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) in North America.\",\"authors\":\"Robert A Hegele, Zahid Ahmad, Ambika Ashraf, Andrew Baldassarra, Alan S Brown, Alan Chait, Steven D Freedman, Brenda Kohn, Michael Miller, Nivedita Patni, Daniel E Soffer, Jian Wang, Michael S Broder, Eunice Chang, Irina Yermilov, Cynthia Campos, Sarah N Gibbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is an ultrarare inherited disorder. Genetic testing is not always feasible or conclusive. European clinicians developed a \\\"FCS score\\\" to differentiate between FCS and multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), a more common condition with overlapping features. A diagnostic score has not been developed for use in the North American context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a diagnostic score for North American patients based on signs, symptoms and biochemical traits of FCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process, we convened ten US/Canadian physicians with experience recognizing and treating FCS and one adult patient with FCS. The panel developed and rated 296 scenarios describing patients with FCS. Linear regression analyses used median post-meeting ratings to develop score parameters. We tested the score's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in patients with classical FCS, functional FCS, and MCS from Western University's Lipid Genetics Clinic's registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerical scores were attributed based upon the following: age, hypertriglyceridemia onset, body mass index, history of abdominal pain/pancreatitis, presence of secondary factors, triglyceride (TG) levels, ratio of TG/total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B level. Scores ≥60 indicate definite classical FCS; the score distinguished patients with FCS from MCS in a real-world registry (100.0 % specificity, 66.7 % sensitivity, 100.0 % PPV, 95.5 % NPV). Scores ≥45 were \\\"very likely\\\" to have classical FCS (96.9 % specificity, 88.9 % sensitivity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given its simplicity and high specificity for distinguishing patients with FCS from MCS, the NAFCS Score could be used in lieu of - or while awaiting - genetic testing to optimize treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and validation of clinical criteria to identify familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) in North America.
Background: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is an ultrarare inherited disorder. Genetic testing is not always feasible or conclusive. European clinicians developed a "FCS score" to differentiate between FCS and multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), a more common condition with overlapping features. A diagnostic score has not been developed for use in the North American context.
Objective: To develop and validate a diagnostic score for North American patients based on signs, symptoms and biochemical traits of FCS.
Methods: Using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process, we convened ten US/Canadian physicians with experience recognizing and treating FCS and one adult patient with FCS. The panel developed and rated 296 scenarios describing patients with FCS. Linear regression analyses used median post-meeting ratings to develop score parameters. We tested the score's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in patients with classical FCS, functional FCS, and MCS from Western University's Lipid Genetics Clinic's registry.
Results: Numerical scores were attributed based upon the following: age, hypertriglyceridemia onset, body mass index, history of abdominal pain/pancreatitis, presence of secondary factors, triglyceride (TG) levels, ratio of TG/total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B level. Scores ≥60 indicate definite classical FCS; the score distinguished patients with FCS from MCS in a real-world registry (100.0 % specificity, 66.7 % sensitivity, 100.0 % PPV, 95.5 % NPV). Scores ≥45 were "very likely" to have classical FCS (96.9 % specificity, 88.9 % sensitivity).
Conclusion: Given its simplicity and high specificity for distinguishing patients with FCS from MCS, the NAFCS Score could be used in lieu of - or while awaiting - genetic testing to optimize treatment.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. While preference is given to material of immediate practical concern, the science that underpins lipidology is forwarded by expert contributors so that evidence-based approaches to reducing cardiovascular and coronary heart disease can be made immediately available to our readers. Sections of the Journal will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.