GLP-1 受体激动剂对 1 型糖尿病患者的有效性和安全性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.3390/jcm13216532
Sumaya N Almohareb, Osamah M Alfayez, Shoroq S Aljuaid, Walaa A Alshahrani, Ghalia Bakhsh, Mohammed K Alshammari, Majed S Al Yami, Omar A Alshaya, Abdullah S Alomran, Ghazwa B Korayem, Omar A Almohammed
{"title":"GLP-1 受体激动剂对 1 型糖尿病患者的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Sumaya N Almohareb, Osamah M Alfayez, Shoroq S Aljuaid, Walaa A Alshahrani, Ghalia Bakhsh, Mohammed K Alshammari, Majed S Al Yami, Omar A Alshaya, Abdullah S Alomran, Ghazwa B Korayem, Omar A Almohammed","doi":"10.3390/jcm13216532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are used in the management of type II diabetes mellitus or obesity, although its role in patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been debated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM using real-world data. <b>Methods</b>: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at three tertiary medical centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study followed up patients (>16 years old) with T1DM treated with insulin followed by GLP-1RA add-on therapy. The efficacy outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin requirements from baseline to each follow-up visit. The main safety outcomes assessed included hypoglycemic events and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. <b>Results</b>: The study included 144 patients with a mean age of 33.0 ± 10.1 years. Semaglutide was the most used GLP-1RA (63.9%) followed by liraglutide (34.0%). From baseline to 3-month follow-up, HbA1c (mean difference (MD) = -0.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.0053), weight (MD = -2.4 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.0253), and daily basal insulin dose (MD = -2.1 units; <i>p</i> = 0.0349) were significantly reduced. Likewise, HbA1c (MD = -0.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), weight (MD = -3.6 kg; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and daily basal insulin (MD = -2.4 units; <i>p</i> = 0.0282) were significantly reduced at the 4-6-month follow-up. The significant reductions in HbA1c, weight, and daily basal insulin levels were consistent for up to 18-month follow-up. Only one patient had a major hypoglycemic event, whereas 8.3% of the patients had GI adverse events. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, significant improvements in glycemic control, weight loss, and insulin requirements were observed with the use of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM, with a limited number of GI adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Sumaya N Almohareb, Osamah M Alfayez, Shoroq S Aljuaid, Walaa A Alshahrani, Ghalia Bakhsh, Mohammed K Alshammari, Majed S Al Yami, Omar A Alshaya, Abdullah S Alomran, Ghazwa B Korayem, Omar A Almohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13216532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are used in the management of type II diabetes mellitus or obesity, although its role in patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been debated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM using real-world data. <b>Methods</b>: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at three tertiary medical centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study followed up patients (>16 years old) with T1DM treated with insulin followed by GLP-1RA add-on therapy. The efficacy outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin requirements from baseline to each follow-up visit. The main safety outcomes assessed included hypoglycemic events and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. <b>Results</b>: The study included 144 patients with a mean age of 33.0 ± 10.1 years. Semaglutide was the most used GLP-1RA (63.9%) followed by liraglutide (34.0%). From baseline to 3-month follow-up, HbA1c (mean difference (MD) = -0.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.0053), weight (MD = -2.4 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.0253), and daily basal insulin dose (MD = -2.1 units; <i>p</i> = 0.0349) were significantly reduced. Likewise, HbA1c (MD = -0.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), weight (MD = -3.6 kg; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and daily basal insulin (MD = -2.4 units; <i>p</i> = 0.0282) were significantly reduced at the 4-6-month follow-up. The significant reductions in HbA1c, weight, and daily basal insulin levels were consistent for up to 18-month follow-up. Only one patient had a major hypoglycemic event, whereas 8.3% of the patients had GI adverse events. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, significant improvements in glycemic control, weight loss, and insulin requirements were observed with the use of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM, with a limited number of GI adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216532\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:GLP-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)用于治疗II型糖尿病或肥胖症,但它在I型糖尿病(T1DM)患者中的作用一直存在争议。本研究旨在利用实际数据调查 GLP-1RA 对 T1DM 患者的疗效和安全性。研究方法这项多中心回顾性研究在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的三家三级医疗中心进行。研究对接受胰岛素治疗后又接受 GLP-1RA 附加疗法的 T1DM 患者(大于 16 岁)进行了随访。疗效结果包括从基线到每次随访期间 HbA1c、体重和胰岛素需求量的变化。评估的主要安全性结果包括低血糖事件和胃肠道 (GI) 不良事件。研究结果研究共纳入144名患者,平均年龄为(33.0±10.1)岁。塞马鲁肽是使用最多的GLP-1RA(63.9%),其次是利拉鲁肽(34.0%)。从基线到3个月随访,HbA1c(平均差(MD)=-0.8%;P = 0.0053)、体重(MD = -2.4公斤;P = 0.0253)和每日基础胰岛素剂量(MD = -2.1单位;P = 0.0349)均显著降低。同样,HbA1c(MD = -0.5%;p = 0.0004)、体重(MD = -3.6千克;p < 0.0001)和每日基础胰岛素剂量(MD = -2.4单位;p = 0.0282)在4-6个月的随访中也显著降低。在长达 18 个月的随访中,HbA1c、体重和每日基础胰岛素水平的明显降低保持不变。只有一名患者发生了严重的低血糖事件,而 8.3% 的患者发生了消化道不良事件。结论:总体而言,T1DM 患者在使用 GLP-1RA 后,血糖控制、体重减轻和胰岛素需求量均有明显改善,仅有少数患者出现消化道不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness and Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are used in the management of type II diabetes mellitus or obesity, although its role in patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been debated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM using real-world data. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at three tertiary medical centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study followed up patients (>16 years old) with T1DM treated with insulin followed by GLP-1RA add-on therapy. The efficacy outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin requirements from baseline to each follow-up visit. The main safety outcomes assessed included hypoglycemic events and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Results: The study included 144 patients with a mean age of 33.0 ± 10.1 years. Semaglutide was the most used GLP-1RA (63.9%) followed by liraglutide (34.0%). From baseline to 3-month follow-up, HbA1c (mean difference (MD) = -0.8%; p = 0.0053), weight (MD = -2.4 kg; p = 0.0253), and daily basal insulin dose (MD = -2.1 units; p = 0.0349) were significantly reduced. Likewise, HbA1c (MD = -0.5%; p = 0.0004), weight (MD = -3.6 kg; p < 0.0001), and daily basal insulin (MD = -2.4 units; p = 0.0282) were significantly reduced at the 4-6-month follow-up. The significant reductions in HbA1c, weight, and daily basal insulin levels were consistent for up to 18-month follow-up. Only one patient had a major hypoglycemic event, whereas 8.3% of the patients had GI adverse events. Conclusions: Overall, significant improvements in glycemic control, weight loss, and insulin requirements were observed with the use of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM, with a limited number of GI adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Body Surface Area Estimation Formulas in Predicting the Risk of Death in Patients with Heart Failure. Complex Thoracic Aortic Diseases and Surgery: A Quest for the Golden Fleece. Activation of Irrigants in Root Canals with Open Apices: A Narrative Review. Applications of Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Patients: A Brain Plasticity Pilot Study. Intra-Articular Physiological Saline in Temporomandibular Disorders May Be a Treatment, Not a Placebo: A Hypothesis, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1