脓毒性休克时儿茶酚胺剂量减少的时间过程是细菌对经验性抗菌治疗敏感性的预测因素:一项回顾性观察研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.3390/jcm13216618
Tsukasa Kuwana, Kosaku Kinoshita, Yurina Yamaya, Ken Takahashi, Junko Yamaguchi, Atsushi Sakurai, Toru Imai
{"title":"脓毒性休克时儿茶酚胺剂量减少的时间过程是细菌对经验性抗菌治疗敏感性的预测因素:一项回顾性观察研究","authors":"Tsukasa Kuwana, Kosaku Kinoshita, Yurina Yamaya, Ken Takahashi, Junko Yamaguchi, Atsushi Sakurai, Toru Imai","doi":"10.3390/jcm13216618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The 28-day mortality rate for septic shock is high, necessitating rapid and effective empiric antimicrobial therapy. In this study, we investigate whether the rate of catecholamine dose reduction in septic shock can indicate bacterial susceptibility to initial antimicrobial therapy or not. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study involved 108 adult patients with bacteraemia and septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit of Nihon University Itabashi Hospital between January 2017 and December 2023. They were classified into the Susceptible or Resistant groups based on the bacteria's susceptibility to the initial empiric antimicrobial therapy. Catecholamine dosages were converted to norepinephrine equivalent (NEE) scores, with the time course from the peak to the end of administration measured at NEE reductions. <b>Results:</b> Of the 108 patients, 94 were in the Susceptible group and 14 in the Resistant group. The Susceptible group showed faster reductions in catecholamine doses: the time to reduce the dose from the maximum NEE to 25% was 19 vs. 49.5 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0057), and to 0%, it was 29 vs. 54 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0475). The time to reduce the dose from the maximum NEE to 75% was 8 vs. 12.5 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0733), and to 50% it was 13 vs. 21.5 h (<i>p</i> = 0.1081). <b>Conclusions:</b> In septic shock with bacteraemia, a faster catecholamine dose reduction indicates bacterial susceptibility to the initial empiric antibiotics. This reduction rate can serve as an early clinical indicator of the appropriate initial empiric therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Time Course of Catecholamine Dose Reduction in Septic Shock as a Predictor of Bacterial Susceptibility to Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tsukasa Kuwana, Kosaku Kinoshita, Yurina Yamaya, Ken Takahashi, Junko Yamaguchi, Atsushi Sakurai, Toru Imai\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13216618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The 28-day mortality rate for septic shock is high, necessitating rapid and effective empiric antimicrobial therapy. In this study, we investigate whether the rate of catecholamine dose reduction in septic shock can indicate bacterial susceptibility to initial antimicrobial therapy or not. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study involved 108 adult patients with bacteraemia and septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit of Nihon University Itabashi Hospital between January 2017 and December 2023. They were classified into the Susceptible or Resistant groups based on the bacteria's susceptibility to the initial empiric antimicrobial therapy. Catecholamine dosages were converted to norepinephrine equivalent (NEE) scores, with the time course from the peak to the end of administration measured at NEE reductions. <b>Results:</b> Of the 108 patients, 94 were in the Susceptible group and 14 in the Resistant group. The Susceptible group showed faster reductions in catecholamine doses: the time to reduce the dose from the maximum NEE to 25% was 19 vs. 49.5 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0057), and to 0%, it was 29 vs. 54 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0475). The time to reduce the dose from the maximum NEE to 75% was 8 vs. 12.5 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0733), and to 50% it was 13 vs. 21.5 h (<i>p</i> = 0.1081). <b>Conclusions:</b> In septic shock with bacteraemia, a faster catecholamine dose reduction indicates bacterial susceptibility to the initial empiric antibiotics. This reduction rate can serve as an early clinical indicator of the appropriate initial empiric therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:脓毒性休克 28 天的死亡率很高,因此需要快速有效的经验性抗菌治疗。在本研究中,我们探讨了脓毒性休克中儿茶酚胺剂量的减少率是否能表明细菌对初始抗菌治疗的敏感性。研究方法这项回顾性观察研究涉及日本大学板桥医院重症监护室在 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间收治的 108 名患有菌血症和脓毒性休克的成人患者。根据细菌对最初经验性抗菌治疗的敏感性,将他们分为易感组和耐药组。儿茶酚胺用量被转换为去甲肾上腺素当量(NEE)评分,从用药高峰到用药结束的时间过程按NEE减少量计算。结果:108 名患者中,94 人属于易感组,14 人属于耐受组。易感组的儿茶酚胺剂量减少较快:从最大 NEE 减少到 25% 的时间为 19 小时对 49.5 小时(p = 0.0057),减少到 0% 的时间为 29 小时对 54 小时(p = 0.0475)。将剂量从最大 NEE 减少到 75% 的时间为 8 小时 vs. 12.5 小时(p = 0.0733),减少到 50% 的时间为 13 小时 vs. 21.5 小时(p = 0.1081)。结论在患有菌血症的脓毒性休克患者中,儿茶酚胺剂量减少速度越快,表明细菌对最初的经验性抗生素越敏感。儿茶酚胺剂量减少速度可作为适当的初始经验疗法的早期临床指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Time Course of Catecholamine Dose Reduction in Septic Shock as a Predictor of Bacterial Susceptibility to Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background/Objectives: The 28-day mortality rate for septic shock is high, necessitating rapid and effective empiric antimicrobial therapy. In this study, we investigate whether the rate of catecholamine dose reduction in septic shock can indicate bacterial susceptibility to initial antimicrobial therapy or not. Methods: This retrospective observational study involved 108 adult patients with bacteraemia and septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit of Nihon University Itabashi Hospital between January 2017 and December 2023. They were classified into the Susceptible or Resistant groups based on the bacteria's susceptibility to the initial empiric antimicrobial therapy. Catecholamine dosages were converted to norepinephrine equivalent (NEE) scores, with the time course from the peak to the end of administration measured at NEE reductions. Results: Of the 108 patients, 94 were in the Susceptible group and 14 in the Resistant group. The Susceptible group showed faster reductions in catecholamine doses: the time to reduce the dose from the maximum NEE to 25% was 19 vs. 49.5 h (p = 0.0057), and to 0%, it was 29 vs. 54 h (p = 0.0475). The time to reduce the dose from the maximum NEE to 75% was 8 vs. 12.5 h (p = 0.0733), and to 50% it was 13 vs. 21.5 h (p = 0.1081). Conclusions: In septic shock with bacteraemia, a faster catecholamine dose reduction indicates bacterial susceptibility to the initial empiric antibiotics. This reduction rate can serve as an early clinical indicator of the appropriate initial empiric therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Body Surface Area Estimation Formulas in Predicting the Risk of Death in Patients with Heart Failure. Complex Thoracic Aortic Diseases and Surgery: A Quest for the Golden Fleece. Activation of Irrigants in Root Canals with Open Apices: A Narrative Review. Applications of Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Patients: A Brain Plasticity Pilot Study. Intra-Articular Physiological Saline in Temporomandibular Disorders May Be a Treatment, Not a Placebo: A Hypothesis, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1