{"title":"稳定五年后的长期随访中,≥6 毫米的实性肺结节的生长情况和临床影响","authors":"Jong Hyuk Lee, Woo Hyeon Lim, Chang Min Park","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2024.0564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the incidence and timing of late growth of subsolid nodules (SSNs) ≥6 mm after initial 5-year stability, its clinical implications, and the appropriate follow-up strategy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included SSNs ≥6 mm that remained stable for the initial five years after detection. The incidence and timing of subsequent growth after five years of stability were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate the clinical stage shift in the SSNs, showing growth and the presence of metastasis during the follow-up period. Finally, an effective follow-up CT scan strategy for managing SSNs after a 5-year period of stability was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-five eligible SSNs (211 pure ground-glass and 24 part-solid nodules) in 235 patients (median age, 63 years; 132 female) were followed for additional <1 to 181 months (median, 87.0 months; interquartile range [IQR], 47.0-119.0 months) after 5-year stability. Fourteen SSNs (6.0%) showed growth at two to 145 months (median, 96 months; IQR: 43.0-122.25 months) from the CT scan confirming 5-year stability, with the estimated cumulative incidence of growth of 0.4%, 2.1%, and 6.5% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Nine SSNs (3.8%) exhibited clinical stage shifts. No lung cancer metastases were observed. Hypothetical follow-up CT scans performed at 5, 10, and 15 years after 5-years of stability, would have detected 5 (36%), 11 (79%), and 14 (100%) of the 14 growing SSNs, along with 4 (44%), 8 (89%), and 9 (100%) of the nine stage shifts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During a long-term follow-up of pulmonary SSNs ≥6 mm after 5-years of stability, a low incidence of growth without occurrence of metastasis was noted. CT scans every five years after the initial 5-year stability period may be reasonable.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth and Clinical Impact of Subsolid Lung Nodules ≥6 mm During Long-Term Follow-Up After Five Years of Stability.\",\"authors\":\"Jong Hyuk Lee, Woo Hyeon Lim, Chang Min Park\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/kjr.2024.0564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the incidence and timing of late growth of subsolid nodules (SSNs) ≥6 mm after initial 5-year stability, its clinical implications, and the appropriate follow-up strategy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included SSNs ≥6 mm that remained stable for the initial five years after detection. The incidence and timing of subsequent growth after five years of stability were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate the clinical stage shift in the SSNs, showing growth and the presence of metastasis during the follow-up period. Finally, an effective follow-up CT scan strategy for managing SSNs after a 5-year period of stability was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-five eligible SSNs (211 pure ground-glass and 24 part-solid nodules) in 235 patients (median age, 63 years; 132 female) were followed for additional <1 to 181 months (median, 87.0 months; interquartile range [IQR], 47.0-119.0 months) after 5-year stability. Fourteen SSNs (6.0%) showed growth at two to 145 months (median, 96 months; IQR: 43.0-122.25 months) from the CT scan confirming 5-year stability, with the estimated cumulative incidence of growth of 0.4%, 2.1%, and 6.5% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Nine SSNs (3.8%) exhibited clinical stage shifts. No lung cancer metastases were observed. Hypothetical follow-up CT scans performed at 5, 10, and 15 years after 5-years of stability, would have detected 5 (36%), 11 (79%), and 14 (100%) of the 14 growing SSNs, along with 4 (44%), 8 (89%), and 9 (100%) of the nine stage shifts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During a long-term follow-up of pulmonary SSNs ≥6 mm after 5-years of stability, a low incidence of growth without occurrence of metastasis was noted. CT scans every five years after the initial 5-year stability period may be reasonable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.0564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.0564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Growth and Clinical Impact of Subsolid Lung Nodules ≥6 mm During Long-Term Follow-Up After Five Years of Stability.
Objective: To investigate the incidence and timing of late growth of subsolid nodules (SSNs) ≥6 mm after initial 5-year stability, its clinical implications, and the appropriate follow-up strategy.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included SSNs ≥6 mm that remained stable for the initial five years after detection. The incidence and timing of subsequent growth after five years of stability were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate the clinical stage shift in the SSNs, showing growth and the presence of metastasis during the follow-up period. Finally, an effective follow-up CT scan strategy for managing SSNs after a 5-year period of stability was investigated.
Results: Two hundred thirty-five eligible SSNs (211 pure ground-glass and 24 part-solid nodules) in 235 patients (median age, 63 years; 132 female) were followed for additional <1 to 181 months (median, 87.0 months; interquartile range [IQR], 47.0-119.0 months) after 5-year stability. Fourteen SSNs (6.0%) showed growth at two to 145 months (median, 96 months; IQR: 43.0-122.25 months) from the CT scan confirming 5-year stability, with the estimated cumulative incidence of growth of 0.4%, 2.1%, and 6.5% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Nine SSNs (3.8%) exhibited clinical stage shifts. No lung cancer metastases were observed. Hypothetical follow-up CT scans performed at 5, 10, and 15 years after 5-years of stability, would have detected 5 (36%), 11 (79%), and 14 (100%) of the 14 growing SSNs, along with 4 (44%), 8 (89%), and 9 (100%) of the nine stage shifts, respectively.
Conclusion: During a long-term follow-up of pulmonary SSNs ≥6 mm after 5-years of stability, a low incidence of growth without occurrence of metastasis was noted. CT scans every five years after the initial 5-year stability period may be reasonable.
期刊介绍:
The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences.
A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge.
World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.