瑞士在零售层面收集的植物肉替代产品的微生物质量。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100402
Karen Barmettler, Silja Waser, Roger Stephan
{"title":"瑞士在零售层面收集的植物肉替代产品的微生物质量。","authors":"Karen Barmettler, Silja Waser, Roger Stephan","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the interest in plant-based alternative food products has increased significantly in the last years, it is also important to investigate these products regarding microbiological aspects. The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological quality and the occurrence of selected foodborne pathogens in plant-based meat alternative products (PBMA) collected at retail level in Switzerland. A total of 100 PBMA (84 vegan and 16 vegetarian products) was analyzed qualitatively for the presence of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes and quantitatively for Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus group members, Enterobacteriaceae and the total viable count. Furthermore, pH measurements were carried out and the a<sub>w</sub>-value was determined. Isolates were further analyzed with Whole Genome Sequencing. The total viable count before the expiration date was between < 2 log and 7 log CFU/g (median: 5.97 log CFU/g). In six (6 %) samples Enterobacteriaceae with 2 log to 3 log CFU/g were detected. No Salmonella and no Listeria monocytogenes were detected. However, seven products (7 %) were contaminated with other Listeria spp. (six L. innocua and one L. seeligeri). Further findings were two (2 %) Staphylococcus aureus ST8 with the presence of selx and tsst-1 genes, and five (5 %) Bacillus cereus group members (three B. paranthracis, one B. cereus sensu stricto, and one B. cytotoxicus) which all were diarrhea-associated strains. This study provides data that are relevant for HACCP concepts of companies that produce plant-based meat alternative products and helps to define microbiological parameters that should be included when testing such products.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological quality of plant-based meat-alternative products collected at retail level in Switzerland.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Barmettler, Silja Waser, Roger Stephan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the interest in plant-based alternative food products has increased significantly in the last years, it is also important to investigate these products regarding microbiological aspects. The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological quality and the occurrence of selected foodborne pathogens in plant-based meat alternative products (PBMA) collected at retail level in Switzerland. A total of 100 PBMA (84 vegan and 16 vegetarian products) was analyzed qualitatively for the presence of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes and quantitatively for Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus group members, Enterobacteriaceae and the total viable count. Furthermore, pH measurements were carried out and the a<sub>w</sub>-value was determined. Isolates were further analyzed with Whole Genome Sequencing. The total viable count before the expiration date was between < 2 log and 7 log CFU/g (median: 5.97 log CFU/g). In six (6 %) samples Enterobacteriaceae with 2 log to 3 log CFU/g were detected. No Salmonella and no Listeria monocytogenes were detected. However, seven products (7 %) were contaminated with other Listeria spp. (six L. innocua and one L. seeligeri). Further findings were two (2 %) Staphylococcus aureus ST8 with the presence of selx and tsst-1 genes, and five (5 %) Bacillus cereus group members (three B. paranthracis, one B. cereus sensu stricto, and one B. cytotoxicus) which all were diarrhea-associated strains. This study provides data that are relevant for HACCP concepts of companies that produce plant-based meat alternative products and helps to define microbiological parameters that should be included when testing such products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人们对植物替代食品的兴趣明显增加,因此对这些产品进行微生物方面的调查也很重要。这项研究的目的是评估在瑞士零售收集的植物性肉类替代产品(PBMA)的微生物质量和特定食源性病原体的发生率。共对 100 种植物性肉类替代品(84 种素食产品和 16 种素食产品)进行了定性分析,以确定是否存在沙门氏菌和李斯特菌,并定量分析了金黄色葡萄球菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌属、肠杆菌科和总存活数。此外,还进行了 pH 值测量和 aw 值测定。对分离物进行了全基因组测序分析。有效期前的总存活数介于 < 2 log 和 7 log CFU/g 之间(中位数:5.97 log CFU/g)。在六个(6%)样品中检测到了 2 至 3 log CFU/g 的肠杆菌。没有检测到沙门氏菌和李斯特菌。不过,有 7 个产品(7%)受到其他李斯特菌属的污染(6 个无毒李斯特菌属和 1 个海氏李斯特菌属)。此外,还发现 2 株(2%)金黄色葡萄球菌 ST8(含有 selx 和 tsst-1 基因)和 5 株(5%)蜡样芽孢杆菌(3 株副蜡样芽孢杆菌、1 株狭义蜡样芽孢杆菌和 1 株细胞毒性蜡样芽孢杆菌),它们都是与腹泻有关的菌株。这项研究提供的数据与生产植物性肉类替代产品的公司的 HACCP 概念相关,并有助于确定检测此类产品时应包括的微生物参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbiological quality of plant-based meat-alternative products collected at retail level in Switzerland.

As the interest in plant-based alternative food products has increased significantly in the last years, it is also important to investigate these products regarding microbiological aspects. The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological quality and the occurrence of selected foodborne pathogens in plant-based meat alternative products (PBMA) collected at retail level in Switzerland. A total of 100 PBMA (84 vegan and 16 vegetarian products) was analyzed qualitatively for the presence of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes and quantitatively for Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus group members, Enterobacteriaceae and the total viable count. Furthermore, pH measurements were carried out and the aw-value was determined. Isolates were further analyzed with Whole Genome Sequencing. The total viable count before the expiration date was between < 2 log and 7 log CFU/g (median: 5.97 log CFU/g). In six (6 %) samples Enterobacteriaceae with 2 log to 3 log CFU/g were detected. No Salmonella and no Listeria monocytogenes were detected. However, seven products (7 %) were contaminated with other Listeria spp. (six L. innocua and one L. seeligeri). Further findings were two (2 %) Staphylococcus aureus ST8 with the presence of selx and tsst-1 genes, and five (5 %) Bacillus cereus group members (three B. paranthracis, one B. cereus sensu stricto, and one B. cytotoxicus) which all were diarrhea-associated strains. This study provides data that are relevant for HACCP concepts of companies that produce plant-based meat alternative products and helps to define microbiological parameters that should be included when testing such products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
期刊最新文献
Integration of National Chemical Hazards Monitoring, Total Diet Study and Human Biomonitoring Programmes for Food Safety Exposure Assessment in Singapore. Unexplained illnesses associated with a subscription meal service, 2022. A Bi-national Sample-Initiated Retrospective Outbreak Investigation of Listeria monocytogenes Infections in the United States and Canada Linked to Enoki Mushrooms Imported from China 2022-2023. Demographic characteristics and county-level indicators of social vulnerability in salmonellosis outbreaks linked to ground beef- United States, 2012-2018. Survival of Generic Escherichia coli on In-Field Mature and Immature Gala and Golden Delicious Apples with or without Overhead Evaporative Cooling Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1