使用子宫动脉栓塞治疗子宫肌瘤:主要国家指南对比回顾。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.11.006
Cyra M Cottrell, Elizabeth A Stewart
{"title":"使用子宫动脉栓塞治疗子宫肌瘤:主要国家指南对比回顾。","authors":"Cyra M Cottrell, Elizabeth A Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fibroids cause significant morbidity, including anemia, pelvic pain, and infertility. It is imperative that healthcare providers are well-versed on the varying treatments available for fibroids. Specifically, uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a treatment that improves anemia, pelvic pain, and quality of life. The purpose of this article is to compare international guidelines on UAE to offer best practices to healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Guidelines from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and the Royal College of Radiologists, National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF), The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were reviewed alongside peer-reviewed PubMed articles.</p><p><strong>Method of study selection: </strong>A comparative review of major international guidelines was conducted to encompass potential geographical, cultural, and societal variances with UAE.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Review of data revealed guidelines agree with many constituents surrounding treatment of fibroids with UAE. Guidelines diverge regarding offering UAE for small fibroids, intracavitary/submucosal fibroids, and pedunculated serosal fibroids with variations on suggested imaging. Most agree that an experienced care team including a gynecologist and interventional radiologist should be included. Preoperative antibiotics and IUD removal may be recommended. UAE for patients who desire fertility remains an option after counseling within most guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UAE is a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective alternative to hysterectomy and myomectomy. Including UAE as a treatment option during the patient counseling process is critical. Guidelines vary based on data interpretation and are based on clinical research and expert opinion. Due to mixed data and lack of randomized controlled trials, organizations differ when offering UAE to patients who wish to preserve fertility. It is vital to note emerging studies supporting the safety of UAE for subsequent pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Comparative Review of Major National Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Cyra M Cottrell, Elizabeth A Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fibroids cause significant morbidity, including anemia, pelvic pain, and infertility. It is imperative that healthcare providers are well-versed on the varying treatments available for fibroids. Specifically, uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a treatment that improves anemia, pelvic pain, and quality of life. The purpose of this article is to compare international guidelines on UAE to offer best practices to healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Guidelines from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and the Royal College of Radiologists, National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF), The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were reviewed alongside peer-reviewed PubMed articles.</p><p><strong>Method of study selection: </strong>A comparative review of major international guidelines was conducted to encompass potential geographical, cultural, and societal variances with UAE.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Review of data revealed guidelines agree with many constituents surrounding treatment of fibroids with UAE. Guidelines diverge regarding offering UAE for small fibroids, intracavitary/submucosal fibroids, and pedunculated serosal fibroids with variations on suggested imaging. Most agree that an experienced care team including a gynecologist and interventional radiologist should be included. Preoperative antibiotics and IUD removal may be recommended. UAE for patients who desire fertility remains an option after counseling within most guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UAE is a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective alternative to hysterectomy and myomectomy. Including UAE as a treatment option during the patient counseling process is critical. Guidelines vary based on data interpretation and are based on clinical research and expert opinion. Due to mixed data and lack of randomized controlled trials, organizations differ when offering UAE to patients who wish to preserve fertility. It is vital to note emerging studies supporting the safety of UAE for subsequent pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.11.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.11.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:子宫肌瘤会导致严重的发病率,包括贫血、盆腔疼痛和不孕症。医疗服务提供者必须精通子宫肌瘤的各种治疗方法。具体来说,子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)是一种可以改善贫血、盆腔疼痛和生活质量的治疗方法。本文旨在比较有关 UAE 的国际指南,为医疗服务提供者提供最佳实践:数据来源:美国妇产科学院 (ACOG)、英国皇家妇产科学院 (RCOG) 和皇家放射学院、法国国家妇产科学院 (CNGOF) 的指南、澳大利亚和新西兰皇家妇产科医师学院 (RANZCOG)、加拿大妇产科医师协会 (SOGC) 和美国国家健康与护理优化研究所 (NICE) 的同行评议 PubMed 文章。研究选择方法:对主要国际指南进行了比较审查,以涵盖潜在的地域、文化和社会差异:数据回顾显示,指南中关于超导介入治疗子宫肌瘤的许多内容都是一致的。关于对小肌瘤、腔内/粘膜下肌瘤和有蒂浆膜下肌瘤进行超导可视化治疗的指南存在分歧,建议的影像学检查也不尽相同。大多数人都认为,应该有一个经验丰富的医疗团队,包括妇科医生和介入放射科医生。建议术前使用抗生素并取出宫内节育器。在大多数指南中,有生育要求的患者在咨询后仍可选择超导介入治疗:结论:超导可视无痛人流是子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤剔除术的一种安全、有效、经济的替代方法。在患者咨询过程中将超导可视无痛人流作为一种治疗方案至关重要。指南因数据解读而异,并以临床研究和专家意见为基础。由于数据混杂且缺乏随机对照试验,各机构在为希望保留生育能力的患者提供超导可视化子宫切除术时存在分歧。值得注意的是,新出现的研究支持超导可视无痛人流对后续妊娠的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Comparative Review of Major National Guidelines.

Objective: Fibroids cause significant morbidity, including anemia, pelvic pain, and infertility. It is imperative that healthcare providers are well-versed on the varying treatments available for fibroids. Specifically, uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a treatment that improves anemia, pelvic pain, and quality of life. The purpose of this article is to compare international guidelines on UAE to offer best practices to healthcare providers.

Data sources: Guidelines from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and the Royal College of Radiologists, National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF), The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were reviewed alongside peer-reviewed PubMed articles.

Method of study selection: A comparative review of major international guidelines was conducted to encompass potential geographical, cultural, and societal variances with UAE.

Tabulation, integration, and results: Review of data revealed guidelines agree with many constituents surrounding treatment of fibroids with UAE. Guidelines diverge regarding offering UAE for small fibroids, intracavitary/submucosal fibroids, and pedunculated serosal fibroids with variations on suggested imaging. Most agree that an experienced care team including a gynecologist and interventional radiologist should be included. Preoperative antibiotics and IUD removal may be recommended. UAE for patients who desire fertility remains an option after counseling within most guidelines.

Conclusions: UAE is a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective alternative to hysterectomy and myomectomy. Including UAE as a treatment option during the patient counseling process is critical. Guidelines vary based on data interpretation and are based on clinical research and expert opinion. Due to mixed data and lack of randomized controlled trials, organizations differ when offering UAE to patients who wish to preserve fertility. It is vital to note emerging studies supporting the safety of UAE for subsequent pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Is vaginal repair a good option for severe cesarean scar defect? Comparison of women with or without residual myometrium. Pelvic splenosis Mimicking Pelvic Tumor. Uterine Artery Embolization before Myomectomy: Is it worth the trouble? Vaginal Bulge is Not Always Prolapse. Use of Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Comparative Review of Major National Guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1