钛板和羟基磷灰石块状垫片在治疗退行性颈椎脊髓病的颈椎板成形术中的增量成本效益比。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.003
Yujiro Kagami, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Segi, Sadayuki Ito, Jun Ouchida, Keisuke Ogura, Ryuichi Shinjo, Shiro Imagama
{"title":"钛板和羟基磷灰石块状垫片在治疗退行性颈椎脊髓病的颈椎板成形术中的增量成本效益比。","authors":"Yujiro Kagami, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Segi, Sadayuki Ito, Jun Ouchida, Keisuke Ogura, Ryuichi Shinjo, Shiro Imagama","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laminoplasty is a widely used surgical procedure to decompress the cervical spinal cord. Recently, titanium plates (TPs) have been used instead of conventional hydroxyapatite block (HA) spacers to prevent laminar reclosure. However, no study has compared the cost-effectiveness of TP and HA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness and postoperative outcomes of laminoplasty using TP or HA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 167 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty at our institution were included in this study. Patients with cervical spinal cord injury, epidural hematoma, or follow-up of <1 year were excluded. Of the 167 patients, 69 underwent laminoplasty using TP (the TP group), and 98 underwent laminoplasty using HA (the HA group). The surgical costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the operation time, complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Hirabayashi recovery rate, and pre and postoperative cervical alignment on X-ray images were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical costs were significantly higher in the TP group than in the HA group (HA, 7255 ± 1504 USD vs. TP, 11,642 ± 2492 USD, p < 0.01). The ICER was 21,935 USD per quality-adjusted life year in the TP group. The operation time was shorter in the TP group than in the HA group (HA, 70.0 ± 22.5 min vs. TP, 63.6 ± 19.3 min, p = 0.06). The Hirabayashi recovery rate and radiographic parameters were similar between the two groups. Implant displacements were significantly more common in the HA group than in the TP group (HA, 11.2 % vs. TP, 0 %, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The surgical costs and ICER with TPs were higher than those with HA spacers. However, no difference in the Hirabayashi recovery rate and postoperative radiological parameters was observed between the two groups, although the HA group had more implant displacements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between titanium plate and hydroxyapatite block spacers in cervical laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Yujiro Kagami, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Segi, Sadayuki Ito, Jun Ouchida, Keisuke Ogura, Ryuichi Shinjo, Shiro Imagama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laminoplasty is a widely used surgical procedure to decompress the cervical spinal cord. Recently, titanium plates (TPs) have been used instead of conventional hydroxyapatite block (HA) spacers to prevent laminar reclosure. However, no study has compared the cost-effectiveness of TP and HA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness and postoperative outcomes of laminoplasty using TP or HA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 167 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty at our institution were included in this study. Patients with cervical spinal cord injury, epidural hematoma, or follow-up of <1 year were excluded. Of the 167 patients, 69 underwent laminoplasty using TP (the TP group), and 98 underwent laminoplasty using HA (the HA group). The surgical costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the operation time, complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Hirabayashi recovery rate, and pre and postoperative cervical alignment on X-ray images were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical costs were significantly higher in the TP group than in the HA group (HA, 7255 ± 1504 USD vs. TP, 11,642 ± 2492 USD, p < 0.01). The ICER was 21,935 USD per quality-adjusted life year in the TP group. The operation time was shorter in the TP group than in the HA group (HA, 70.0 ± 22.5 min vs. TP, 63.6 ± 19.3 min, p = 0.06). The Hirabayashi recovery rate and radiographic parameters were similar between the two groups. Implant displacements were significantly more common in the HA group than in the TP group (HA, 11.2 % vs. TP, 0 %, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The surgical costs and ICER with TPs were higher than those with HA spacers. However, no difference in the Hirabayashi recovery rate and postoperative radiological parameters was observed between the two groups, although the HA group had more implant displacements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介板层成形术是一种广泛使用的颈椎脊髓减压手术方法。最近,钛板(TP)被用来代替传统的羟基磷灰石块(HA)垫片,以防止椎板再闭合。然而,还没有研究比较过 TP 和 HA 的成本效益。因此,本研究旨在比较使用 TP 或 HA 进行椎板成形术的成本效益和术后效果:本研究共纳入了 167 名在我院接受颈椎板层成形术的患者。结果:采用 TP 或 HA 进行颈椎板成形术的患者的手术费用明显高于采用 TP 或 HA 进行颈椎板成形术的患者:TP组的手术费用明显高于HA组(HA,7255 ± 1504 美元 vs. TP,11642 ± 2492 美元,P 结论:TP组的手术费用和ICER均高于HA组:使用 TP 的手术成本和 ICER 均高于使用 HA 间隙器的成本和 ICER。不过,虽然 HA 组的植入物移位较多,但两组的平林恢复率和术后放射学参数并无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between titanium plate and hydroxyapatite block spacers in cervical laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Introduction: Laminoplasty is a widely used surgical procedure to decompress the cervical spinal cord. Recently, titanium plates (TPs) have been used instead of conventional hydroxyapatite block (HA) spacers to prevent laminar reclosure. However, no study has compared the cost-effectiveness of TP and HA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness and postoperative outcomes of laminoplasty using TP or HA.

Methods: A total of 167 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty at our institution were included in this study. Patients with cervical spinal cord injury, epidural hematoma, or follow-up of <1 year were excluded. Of the 167 patients, 69 underwent laminoplasty using TP (the TP group), and 98 underwent laminoplasty using HA (the HA group). The surgical costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the operation time, complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Hirabayashi recovery rate, and pre and postoperative cervical alignment on X-ray images were investigated.

Results: The surgical costs were significantly higher in the TP group than in the HA group (HA, 7255 ± 1504 USD vs. TP, 11,642 ± 2492 USD, p < 0.01). The ICER was 21,935 USD per quality-adjusted life year in the TP group. The operation time was shorter in the TP group than in the HA group (HA, 70.0 ± 22.5 min vs. TP, 63.6 ± 19.3 min, p = 0.06). The Hirabayashi recovery rate and radiographic parameters were similar between the two groups. Implant displacements were significantly more common in the HA group than in the TP group (HA, 11.2 % vs. TP, 0 %, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The surgical costs and ICER with TPs were higher than those with HA spacers. However, no difference in the Hirabayashi recovery rate and postoperative radiological parameters was observed between the two groups, although the HA group had more implant displacements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and results after conservative treatment or interfascicular neurolysis of 100 limbs with spontaneous anterior interosseous nerve palsy: A prospective Japanese multicenter study. Minimal clinically important difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score and shoulder 36 after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Japanese population: A retrospective cohort study. What is the appropriate revascularisation approach in traumatic popliteal artery injury? Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis. Analysis of cancer multigene panel testing for osteosarcoma in pediatric and adults using the center for cancer genomics and advanced therapeutics database in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1