Currie Moore PhD, Helen Ellis-Caird ClinPsyD, Catherine Fielding PhD, Faizan Awan, Tarsem Paul, Rebecca Flanagan BSc, Shivani Sharma PhD, Kieran McCafferty MDRes, Sabine N. van der Veer PhD, Ken Farrington PhD, David Wellsted PhD
{"title":"患者对影响血液透析针刺的关键因素的看法:定性研究。","authors":"Currie Moore PhD, Helen Ellis-Caird ClinPsyD, Catherine Fielding PhD, Faizan Awan, Tarsem Paul, Rebecca Flanagan BSc, Shivani Sharma PhD, Kieran McCafferty MDRes, Sabine N. van der Veer PhD, Ken Farrington PhD, David Wellsted PhD","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>For many patients, cannulation (‘needling’) is essential for haemodialysis. It is associated with anxiety and fear and contributes to the overall burden of treatment. Limited research exists on patient experience of needling and how this might vary by individual and clinical characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To explore and identify key aspects of needling impacting patients' experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative, multicentre, cross-sectional, co-produced.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Adults on haemodialysis with working fistulae or grafts (<i>n</i> = 41).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>We used interviews to explore patients' experiences of needling and key aspects contributing to this. Interviews were conducted in two sets: unstructured (<i>n</i> = 24, broadly investigated needling experience) and semistructured (<i>n</i> = 17, refined themes and assessed cultural relevance). Thematic analysis was used to identify themes driving experience and examine variation. A Patient Steering Group comprising people with lived experience of needling was integral to the study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>A thematic framework capturing patients' view of needling was developed. It defined a core theme (The Nature of needling) and five foundational aspects of needling (Health of the fistula or graft, Steps in needling, The needler, The patient, Organisational context). We identified two further themes important to overall experience, Learning from needling experience and Reciprocity (the two-way interaction between patient and needler). Both interrelated across themes, highlighting the complexity of needling and junctures where patient experience can be influenced.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Needling is shaped by multiple psychological and relational influences. These findings provide healthcare professionals with a basis to improve patient experience as part of a broader drive to enhance quality in healthcare delivery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"50 4","pages":"538-551"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12513","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' perspectives on key aspects influencing needling for haemodialysis: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Currie Moore PhD, Helen Ellis-Caird ClinPsyD, Catherine Fielding PhD, Faizan Awan, Tarsem Paul, Rebecca Flanagan BSc, Shivani Sharma PhD, Kieran McCafferty MDRes, Sabine N. van der Veer PhD, Ken Farrington PhD, David Wellsted PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jorc.12513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>For many patients, cannulation (‘needling’) is essential for haemodialysis. It is associated with anxiety and fear and contributes to the overall burden of treatment. Limited research exists on patient experience of needling and how this might vary by individual and clinical characteristics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore and identify key aspects of needling impacting patients' experiences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative, multicentre, cross-sectional, co-produced.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adults on haemodialysis with working fistulae or grafts (<i>n</i> = 41).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used interviews to explore patients' experiences of needling and key aspects contributing to this. Interviews were conducted in two sets: unstructured (<i>n</i> = 24, broadly investigated needling experience) and semistructured (<i>n</i> = 17, refined themes and assessed cultural relevance). Thematic analysis was used to identify themes driving experience and examine variation. A Patient Steering Group comprising people with lived experience of needling was integral to the study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>A thematic framework capturing patients' view of needling was developed. It defined a core theme (The Nature of needling) and five foundational aspects of needling (Health of the fistula or graft, Steps in needling, The needler, The patient, Organisational context). We identified two further themes important to overall experience, Learning from needling experience and Reciprocity (the two-way interaction between patient and needler). Both interrelated across themes, highlighting the complexity of needling and junctures where patient experience can be influenced.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Needling is shaped by multiple psychological and relational influences. These findings provide healthcare professionals with a basis to improve patient experience as part of a broader drive to enhance quality in healthcare delivery.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"538-551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12513\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12513\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients' perspectives on key aspects influencing needling for haemodialysis: A qualitative study
Background
For many patients, cannulation (‘needling’) is essential for haemodialysis. It is associated with anxiety and fear and contributes to the overall burden of treatment. Limited research exists on patient experience of needling and how this might vary by individual and clinical characteristics.
Objectives
To explore and identify key aspects of needling impacting patients' experiences.
Adults on haemodialysis with working fistulae or grafts (n = 41).
Approach
We used interviews to explore patients' experiences of needling and key aspects contributing to this. Interviews were conducted in two sets: unstructured (n = 24, broadly investigated needling experience) and semistructured (n = 17, refined themes and assessed cultural relevance). Thematic analysis was used to identify themes driving experience and examine variation. A Patient Steering Group comprising people with lived experience of needling was integral to the study.
Findings
A thematic framework capturing patients' view of needling was developed. It defined a core theme (The Nature of needling) and five foundational aspects of needling (Health of the fistula or graft, Steps in needling, The needler, The patient, Organisational context). We identified two further themes important to overall experience, Learning from needling experience and Reciprocity (the two-way interaction between patient and needler). Both interrelated across themes, highlighting the complexity of needling and junctures where patient experience can be influenced.
Conclusions
Needling is shaped by multiple psychological and relational influences. These findings provide healthcare professionals with a basis to improve patient experience as part of a broader drive to enhance quality in healthcare delivery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA).
The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given.
The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.