YouTube 作为外周神经刺激医学信息的来源。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuromodulation Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472
Abhinav Gupta, Alexander Beletsky, Alice Y Shen, Wesley Chin, Cherry Liu, Rajiv Reddy
{"title":"YouTube 作为外周神经刺激医学信息的来源。","authors":"Abhinav Gupta, Alexander Beletsky, Alice Y Shen, Wesley Chin, Cherry Liu, Rajiv Reddy","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>YouTube is an important source of medical information for various medical topics and procedures. The purpose of the present study is to appraise the quality of medical information available on YouTube on the topic of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 53 videos were appraised by four individuals using three scales for appraisal: 1) the Modified DISCERN scale, 2) the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark scoring, and 3) the Global Quality Scale. Descriptive characteristics and author type of each video were recorded. The mean scores of these scales among all four reviewers based on author type were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores of the three scales among author types, and post hoc pairwise Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used to evaluate for significant differences between mean scores. Furthermore, mean scale scores of videos above and below the total average-view count and total average \"thumbs ups\" were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most videos (n = 31, 58.5%) were submitted from private practice. The mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by academic and society authors (M = 3.54 and 2.83, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by private practice authors (M = 2.10 and 2.03, respectively). Interestingly, the mean scale scores of videos with above-average view counts were found to be lower than scores of videos with below-average view counts across all three scoring instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube videos on PNS stimulation for chronic pain are low to moderate in quality. Videos from academic sources were higher in quality than were private practice videos. Furthermore, videos with above-average view counts had lower mean scores on all three instruments, suggesting most of the viewership had watched lower-quality video content.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YouTube as a Source of Medical Information About Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Abhinav Gupta, Alexander Beletsky, Alice Y Shen, Wesley Chin, Cherry Liu, Rajiv Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>YouTube is an important source of medical information for various medical topics and procedures. The purpose of the present study is to appraise the quality of medical information available on YouTube on the topic of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 53 videos were appraised by four individuals using three scales for appraisal: 1) the Modified DISCERN scale, 2) the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark scoring, and 3) the Global Quality Scale. Descriptive characteristics and author type of each video were recorded. The mean scores of these scales among all four reviewers based on author type were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores of the three scales among author types, and post hoc pairwise Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used to evaluate for significant differences between mean scores. Furthermore, mean scale scores of videos above and below the total average-view count and total average \\\"thumbs ups\\\" were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most videos (n = 31, 58.5%) were submitted from private practice. The mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by academic and society authors (M = 3.54 and 2.83, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by private practice authors (M = 2.10 and 2.03, respectively). Interestingly, the mean scale scores of videos with above-average view counts were found to be lower than scores of videos with below-average view counts across all three scoring instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube videos on PNS stimulation for chronic pain are low to moderate in quality. Videos from academic sources were higher in quality than were private practice videos. Furthermore, videos with above-average view counts had lower mean scores on all three instruments, suggesting most of the viewership had watched lower-quality video content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuromodulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:YouTube 是各种医疗主题和程序的重要医疗信息来源。本研究旨在评估 YouTube 上有关外周神经刺激(PNS)治疗慢性疼痛主题的医疗信息质量:共有 53 个视频由四人使用三种评估量表进行评估:1)改良 DISCERN 量表;2)《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准评分;3)全球质量量表。每段视频的描述性特征和作者类型均有记录。根据作者类型计算所有四位审稿人在这些量表中的平均得分。采用单因素方差分析来比较不同作者类型的三个量表的平均得分,并采用事后配对 Tukey's 诚实显著性差异检验来评估平均得分之间的显著差异。此外,还计算并比较了高于和低于总平均观看次数和总平均 "竖起大拇指 "次数的视频的平均量表得分:大多数视频(n = 31,58.5%)来自私人诊所。学术作者和社会作者提交的视频的平均修正 DISCERN 分和 JAMA 分(M = 3.54 和 2.83,分别)明显高于私人医生提交的视频的平均修正 DISCERN 分和 JAMA 分(M = 2.10 和 2.03,分别)(p < 0.05)。有趣的是,在所有三种评分工具中,浏览量高于平均值的视频的平均量表得分均低于浏览量低于平均值的视频:结论:YouTube上有关PNS刺激治疗慢性疼痛的视频质量处于中下水平。来自学术界的视频质量高于私人诊所的视频。此外,浏览量高于平均值的视频在三项评分工具中的平均得分都较低,这表明大部分观众观看的视频内容质量较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
YouTube as a Source of Medical Information About Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Objectives: YouTube is an important source of medical information for various medical topics and procedures. The purpose of the present study is to appraise the quality of medical information available on YouTube on the topic of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic pain.

Materials and methods: A total of 53 videos were appraised by four individuals using three scales for appraisal: 1) the Modified DISCERN scale, 2) the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark scoring, and 3) the Global Quality Scale. Descriptive characteristics and author type of each video were recorded. The mean scores of these scales among all four reviewers based on author type were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores of the three scales among author types, and post hoc pairwise Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used to evaluate for significant differences between mean scores. Furthermore, mean scale scores of videos above and below the total average-view count and total average "thumbs ups" were calculated and compared.

Results: Most videos (n = 31, 58.5%) were submitted from private practice. The mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by academic and society authors (M = 3.54 and 2.83, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by private practice authors (M = 2.10 and 2.03, respectively). Interestingly, the mean scale scores of videos with above-average view counts were found to be lower than scores of videos with below-average view counts across all three scoring instruments.

Conclusions: YouTube videos on PNS stimulation for chronic pain are low to moderate in quality. Videos from academic sources were higher in quality than were private practice videos. Furthermore, videos with above-average view counts had lower mean scores on all three instruments, suggesting most of the viewership had watched lower-quality video content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuromodulation
Neuromodulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
978
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface is the preeminent journal in the area of neuromodulation, providing our readership with the state of the art clinical, translational, and basic science research in the field. For clinicians, engineers, scientists and members of the biotechnology industry alike, Neuromodulation provides timely and rigorously peer-reviewed articles on the technology, science, and clinical application of devices that interface with the nervous system to treat disease and improve function.
期刊最新文献
Field H1 of Forel vs Subthalamic Nucleus Electrical Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long-term Effects on Motor Symptoms and Quality of Life. Seeking Optimal Montage for Single-Pair Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using Bayesian Optimization and Hyperband-A Feasibility Study. Modulation of Local Field Potentials in the Deep Brain of Minipigs Through Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation. YouTube as a Source of Medical Information About Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1